Qu Xiaohua, Wu Yu, Zhang Honglin, Li Xinxin, Gao Peike, Li Ying, Xin Yufeng
School of Life Sciences, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, 273165, People's Republic of China.
State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, 266237, People's Republic of China.
Curr Microbiol. 2025 Mar 26;82(5):213. doi: 10.1007/s00284-025-04195-0.
Although sulfate fertilizers increase soil sulfur content, their impact on microbial communities and sulfur metabolism remains unclear. We hypothesized that sulfate supplementation affects microbial community abundance and sulfur metabolism, influencing sulfur compound levels. In laboratory settings, we supplemented bare soil with a sulfate solution and monitored 16S rRNA and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) gene expressions, sulfur metabolism-related compounds, and soil organic carbon for 30 days. Significant bacterial community-related alterations were observed upon 1 g kg potassium sulfate supplementation; however, fungal communities remained unchanged. Compared to the control, sulfate-treated soil significantly accumulated Acidobacteria by day 12 and Bacteroidetes and Verrucomicrobiota by day 30. No such differences were observed in fungal communities. Our 16SrRNA and ITS gene-related functional prediction analysis revealed that sulfate addition significantly increased sulfur transport-, assimilation-, and reduction-associated gene expressions in the soil, indicating increased microbial sulfate activity, primarily through assimilation pathways. Among sulfur compounds, sulfate addition significantly increased only sulfate levels, and even these values remained relatively stable. However, sulfate supplementation significantly induced soil organic carbon consumption, highlighting microbial sulfur cycling stability and sulfur-carbon co-metabolism. Null model analysis of the sequencing data indicated potentially stochastic process-dominated microbial community assembly within 30 days, unaffected by sulfate addition. Overall, sulfate-based fertilizers primarily alter bacterial community structure, allowing for metabolic balance establishment of the sulfur cycle within a certain range, while significantly increasing soil organic carbon consumption. Therefore, sulfate-based fertilizer application and soil organic carbon and pH monitoring must occur simultaneously to avoid excessive sulfate use, potentially leading to soil dysfunction.
尽管硫酸盐肥料会增加土壤硫含量,但其对微生物群落和硫代谢的影响仍不清楚。我们推测补充硫酸盐会影响微生物群落丰度和硫代谢,进而影响硫化合物水平。在实验室环境中,我们向裸土中添加硫酸盐溶液,并在30天内监测16S rRNA和内转录间隔区(ITS)基因表达、硫代谢相关化合物以及土壤有机碳。添加1 g/kg硫酸钾后观察到细菌群落发生了显著变化;然而,真菌群落未发生改变。与对照相比,经硫酸盐处理的土壤在第12天显著积累了酸杆菌,在第30天显著积累了拟杆菌和疣微菌门。在真菌群落中未观察到此类差异。我们基于16SrRNA和ITS基因的功能预测分析表明,添加硫酸盐显著增加了土壤中与硫运输、同化和还原相关的基因表达,表明微生物硫酸盐活性增加,主要通过同化途径。在硫化合物中,添加硫酸盐仅显著增加了硫酸盐水平,而且这些值仍相对稳定。然而,补充硫酸盐显著诱导了土壤有机碳的消耗,突出了微生物硫循环的稳定性和硫-碳共代谢。对测序数据的零模型分析表明,在30天内微生物群落组装可能以随机过程为主,不受添加硫酸盐的影响。总体而言,基于硫酸盐的肥料主要改变细菌群落结构,在一定范围内实现硫循环的代谢平衡,同时显著增加土壤有机碳的消耗。因此,必须同时进行基于硫酸盐的肥料施用以及土壤有机碳和pH监测,以避免过度使用硫酸盐,否则可能导致土壤功能失调。