Van Hulst Andraea, Zheng Sophie, Argiropoulos Nikolas, Ybarra Marina, Ball Geoff D C, Kakinami Lisa
Ingram School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Mcgill University, 680 Sherbrooke West, Montreal, QC, H3A 2M7, Canada.
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Arts and Science, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Mar 27;184(4):270. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06098-5.
The World Health Organization recommends using + 2 SD of body mass index z-score (zBMI) to define overweight/obesity (OWO) in children ages 2 to 5 years whereas + 1 SD is used as cut-point from 5 years onwards. Empirical evidence for using different cut-points across childhood is lacking. Our objective was to compare the ability of OWO in early childhood defined using zBMI cut-points at + 2 SD and + 1 SD to predict obesity at 10 years. Data from a prospective birth cohort (QLSCD) were analyzed. At ages 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5 years, children were classified as OWO based on + 2 SD and + 1 SD zBMI cut-points. At 10 years, obesity was assessed (zBMI and waist circumference). Associations between OWO (vs non-OWO) and later obesity were estimated using multivariable linear regressions. Outcome predictions for each cut-point were compared using partial eta-squared values. The sample included 1092 children (53% female). OWO in early childhood was 2-3 times more prevalent when using + 1 SD vs + 2 SD cut-points. In relation to later obesity, partial eta-squared values for both cut-points of OWO were in the small to medium effect size range (ranging from 3 to 15%), suggesting that OWO regardless of cut-point contributed only modestly to obesity measured at 10 years. However, across all time points, eta-squared values were slightly higher for OWO defined at + 1 SD vs + 2 SD, indicating a higher proportion of variance in outcomes being accounted for at zBMI + 1 SD. Conclusion: In children 2 to 5 years old, both definitions of OWO had small to modest effect sizes in relation to obesity in childhood albeit with a marginally superior predictive ability of the + 1 SD over the + 2 SD cut-point across early childhood. From a clinical perspective, using a single cut-point from early childhood onwards may be more practical to monitor growth and weight gain over time and identify children at risk of persistent obesity. What is Known: • The World Health Organization recommends using zBMI cut-points at + 2 SD for children ages 2-5 years, and + 1 SD from 5 years onwards to define overweight/obesity • Research is needed to determine which zBMI cut-point (+ 2 SD or + 1 SD) in children under 5 years best predicts subsequent obesity What is New: • Both definitions of overweight/obesity in early childhood contributed modestly to obesity at 10 years, with + 1 SD being marginally more effective than + 2 SD • Using a single cut-point at + 1 SD across childhood may be more practical for monitoring growth, weight gain, and identifying children at risk of persistent obesity.
世界卫生组织建议使用体重指数Z评分(zBMI)高于均值2个标准差来定义2至5岁儿童的超重/肥胖(OWO),而从5岁起则使用高于均值1个标准差作为切点。目前缺乏关于在整个儿童期使用不同切点的实证依据。我们的目的是比较使用高于均值2个标准差和高于均值1个标准差的zBMI切点定义的幼儿期OWO预测10岁时肥胖的能力。对一项前瞻性出生队列(QLSCD)的数据进行了分析。在2.5岁、3.5岁和4.5岁时,根据高于均值2个标准差和高于均值1个标准差的zBMI切点将儿童分类为OWO。在10岁时,评估肥胖情况(zBMI和腰围)。使用多变量线性回归估计OWO(与非OWO相比)与后期肥胖之间的关联。使用偏 eta 平方值比较每个切点的结果预测。样本包括1092名儿童(53%为女性)。与使用高于均值2个标准差的切点相比,使用高于均值1个标准差的切点时,幼儿期OWO的患病率高出2至3倍。关于后期肥胖,OWO两个切点的偏 eta 平方值处于小到中等效应量范围(3%至15%),这表明无论使用哪个切点,OWO对10岁时测量的肥胖的影响都不大。然而,在所有时间点上,高于均值1个标准差定义的OWO的eta平方值略高于高于均值2个标准差定义的OWO,这表明在zBMI高于均值1个标准差时,结果中的方差占比更高。结论:在2至5岁的儿童中,OWO的两种定义与儿童期肥胖的效应量都较小到中等,尽管在幼儿期高于均值1个标准差的切点的预测能力略优于高于均值2个标准差的切点。从临床角度来看,从幼儿期开始使用单一切点可能更便于长期监测生长和体重增加情况,并识别有持续性肥胖风险的儿童。已知信息:• 世界卫生组织建议使用高于均值2个标准差的zBMI切点来定义2至5岁儿童的超重/肥胖,5岁及以上则使用高于均值1个标准差的切点。• 需要开展研究以确定5岁以下儿童使用哪个zBMI切点(高于均值2个标准差还是高于均值1个标准差)能最好地预测后续肥胖情况。新发现:• 幼儿期超重/肥胖的两种定义对10岁时肥胖的影响都不大,高于均值1个标准差的切点比高于均值2个标准差的切点略有效。• 在整个儿童期使用高于均值1个标准差的单一切点可能更便于监测生长、体重增加情况以及识别有持续性肥胖风险的儿童。