Zhu Xuequan, Chen Xiongying, Wu Yuanzhen, Feng Lei, Chen Xu
Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & National Center for Mental Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 26;25(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06538-4.
We examined the factors influencing various subtypes of subjective cognitive change in patients who shared similar objective cognitive trajectories within 6 months.
We used data from an observational, prospective, cohort study, including 598 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) in latent class mixed models based on the digit symbol substitution test performance. Participants were stratified into four distinct objective cognitive layers: "low cognitive performance," "lower-middle cognitive performance," "upper-middle cognitive performance," and "high cognitive performance." Within each of the four layers, the trajectories of subjective cognitive complaints were identified. Multinomial regression was employed, with cognitive complaint trajectories as the outcome, and depressive symptoms, clinical features, and other covariates as predictors.
The factors influencing the subjective trajectories varied among the different objective layers. Patients with comorbid anxiety disorders or functional syndromes had more prominent self-reported cognitive symptoms and a slower rate of improvement. Younger age and lower education level were also influential factors for delayed remission of subjective cognitive function. Disease severity and antidepressant type did not contribute to dedifferentiating subjective cognitive trajectory subtypes within different subjective cognitive trajectories.
Despite similar objective cognitive trajectories, subjective perceptions of these cognitive changes are heterogeneous. These findings deepen our understanding of the multifaceted nature of cognitive change in individuals with MDD and underscore the importance of considering a range of factors when interpreting and treating cognitive impairment at an early stage.
我们研究了在6个月内具有相似客观认知轨迹的患者中影响主观认知变化各种亚型的因素。
我们使用了一项观察性、前瞻性队列研究的数据,该研究包括598名患有重度抑郁症(MDD)的患者,基于数字符号替换测试表现,采用潜在类别混合模型。参与者被分为四个不同的客观认知层次:“低认知表现”、“中低认知表现”、“中高认知表现”和“高认知表现”。在这四个层次中的每一个层次内,确定主观认知抱怨的轨迹。采用多项回归分析,以认知抱怨轨迹为结果,以抑郁症状、临床特征和其他协变量为预测因素。
影响主观轨迹的因素在不同的客观层次中有所不同。患有共病焦虑症或功能综合征的患者自我报告的认知症状更突出,改善速度更慢。年龄较小和教育水平较低也是主观认知功能缓解延迟的影响因素。疾病严重程度和抗抑郁药类型对不同主观认知轨迹内主观认知轨迹亚型的去分化没有贡献。
尽管客观认知轨迹相似,但对这些认知变化的主观感受是异质的。这些发现加深了我们对MDD患者认知变化多方面性质的理解,并强调在早期解释和治疗认知障碍时考虑一系列因素的重要性。