Wang Feng, Lu Jiawei, Wang Bijun, Zhu Ziqi, Shen Beiduo, Guo Kai, Ba Zhaoyu, Huang Yufeng, Wu Desheng
Department of Spine Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, No.150 Jimo Road, Shanghai, 200092, China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Mar 26;26(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08285-9.
To investigate the risk factors for radiographic adjacent segment disease (RASD), with a focus on the impact of screw position, following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate fixation (ACDF-P).
We conducted a comprehensive analysis on 126 patients who underwent ACDF-P for degenerative cervical spinal disease, evaluating various factors such as demographics, cervical sagittal parameters, the number of fused segments, sagittal screw angle, plate to disc distance (PDD), and screw position score (SPS). Based on MRI findings, we classified patients into ASD and Non-ASD groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors, and the model's discrimination was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Additionally, we evaluated the predictive value of SPS for RASD using ROC curves. To further investigate the relationship between screw position and RASD, we reanalyzed the data of patients with PDD of less than 5 mm to eliminate the effect of PDD.
Among the 126 patients, 57 developed RASD after a minimum follow-up period of 5 years. No significant differences were observed in demographics, cervical sagittal parameters, number of fused segments, or sagittal screw angle between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, PDD and SPS showed significant differences between the two groups (p < 0.05). Multivariate binary logistic models revealed that PDD (OR: 3.238; 95% CI:1.191-8.807; p < 0.021) and SPS (OR: 1.309 95% CI: 1.092-1.568; p = 0.004) were risk factor for RASD. The models exhibited excellent discrimination and calibration. The area under the curve (AUC) for RASD identified by SPS were 0.674. Among patients with PDD less than 5 mm, SPS was significantly higher in the ASD group compared to the Non-ASD group (p < 0.05). After grouping by screw position, it was determined that both the incidence of RASD (70.5% vs. 34.6%, p < 0.05) and the percentage of long-segment fusion (3-4 levels) (38.6% vs. 7.7%, p < 0.05) were significantly higher in the group with a score greater than 6 compared to the group with a score of 6 or lower.
Our findings indicate that a PDD of less than 5 mm and a higher SPS are related with RASD following ACDF-P. Secondary analysis indicates that screw position, as indicated by the SPS, may be a primary contributor to ASD, rather than PDD.
Not applicable.
探讨颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合钢板固定术(ACDF-P)后影像学相邻节段疾病(RASD)的危险因素,重点关注螺钉位置的影响。
我们对126例因退行性颈椎疾病接受ACDF-P手术的患者进行了全面分析,评估了各种因素,如人口统计学特征、颈椎矢状面参数、融合节段数、矢状螺钉角度、钢板与椎间盘距离(PDD)和螺钉位置评分(SPS)。根据MRI结果,将患者分为ASD组和非ASD组。采用逻辑回归分析评估危险因素,并使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估模型的辨别力。此外,我们使用ROC曲线评估SPS对RASD的预测价值。为进一步研究螺钉位置与RASD之间的关系,我们重新分析了PDD小于5mm的患者数据,以消除PDD的影响。
在126例患者中,57例在至少5年的随访期后发生了RASD。两组在人口统计学特征、颈椎矢状面参数、融合节段数或矢状螺钉角度方面未观察到显著差异(p>0.05)。然而,PDD和SPS在两组之间显示出显著差异(p<0.05)。多变量二元逻辑模型显示,PDD(OR:3.238;95%CI:1.191-8.807;p<0.021)和SPS(OR:1.309,95%CI:1.092-1.568;p=0.004)是RASD的危险因素。模型表现出良好的辨别力和校准度。SPS识别出的RASD的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.674。在PDD小于5mm的患者中,ASD组的SPS显著高于非ASD组(p<0.05)。按螺钉位置分组后,确定评分大于6的组中RASD的发生率(70.5%对34.6%,p<0.05)和长节段融合(3-4个节段)的百分比(38.6%对7.7%,p<0.05)均显著高于评分6或更低的组。
我们的研究结果表明,ACDF-P术后PDD小于5mm和较高的SPS与RASD相关。二次分析表明,SPS所示的螺钉位置可能是ASD的主要促成因素,而非PDD。
不适用。