• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诊断试验确定性增加的测量方法。

Measures of gain in certainty from a diagnostic test.

作者信息

Connell F A, Koepsell T D

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 1985 May;121(5):744-53. doi: 10.1093/aje/121.5.744.

DOI:10.1093/aje/121.5.744
PMID:4014166
Abstract

The authors propose several measures for quantifying the change in the clinical estimate of a patient's chances of having a disease that occurs as a result of diagnostic testing. Under most circumstances, the gain in clinical certainty from a positive test result is more affected by the specificity (T) of the test, while the gain from a negative test result is more affected by sensitivity (S). The prevalence of the disease in the tested population is also an important determinant of the magnitude of gain in certainty. Measures of the expected gain in certainty can be calculated by weighting the gains from a positive or negative result by the likelihood of the respective test outcome. Indices of expected gain depend directly on the quantity S + T, implying that sensitivity and specificity have equal importance in determining expected gain. When S + T = 1, the test provides no information; when S + T is greatest, the expected gain is maximized. Expected gain is also related to the receiver operating characteristic curve for a diagnostic test: the point on the receiver operating characteristic curve at which S + T is greatest corresponds to the point at which the distance from the major diagonal is greatest at which the slope of the receiver operating characteristic curve equals 1.

摘要

作者提出了几种用于量化因诊断测试而导致的患者患某种疾病可能性的临床估计变化的方法。在大多数情况下,阳性测试结果带来的临床确定性增加更多地受测试的特异性(T)影响,而阴性测试结果带来的增加则更多地受敏感性(S)影响。所测试人群中疾病的患病率也是确定性增加幅度的一个重要决定因素。确定性预期增加的度量可以通过将阳性或阴性结果的增加按各自测试结果的可能性进行加权来计算。预期增加指数直接取决于S + T的值,这意味着敏感性和特异性在确定预期增加方面具有同等重要性。当S + T = 1时,测试不提供任何信息;当S + T最大时,预期增加最大。预期增加也与诊断测试的接收者操作特征曲线相关:接收者操作特征曲线上S + T最大的点对应于与主对角线距离最大且接收者操作特征曲线斜率等于1的点。

相似文献

1
Measures of gain in certainty from a diagnostic test.诊断试验确定性增加的测量方法。
Am J Epidemiol. 1985 May;121(5):744-53. doi: 10.1093/aje/121.5.744.
2
The agreement chart as an alternative to the receiver-operating characteristic curve for diagnostic tests.作为诊断试验的接收者操作特征曲线替代方法的一致性图表。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Sep;61(9):866-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.04.002.
3
The indication area of a diagnostic test. Part I--discounting gain and loss in diagnostic certainty.诊断试验的指示范围。第一部分——排除诊断确定性的增益和损失。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Oct;68(10):1120-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
4
Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.用于识别结直肠癌患者营养不良的营养评估工具的诊断测试准确性:一项系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 May 15;13(4):141-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1673.
5
Importance of epidemiology and biostatistics in deciding clinical strategies for using diagnostic tests: a simplified approach using examples from coronary artery disease.流行病学和生物统计学在确定诊断试验临床策略中的重要性:以冠状动脉疾病为例的简化方法
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 Jun;13(7):1653-65. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90361-6.
6
The indication area of a diagnostic test. Part II--the impact of test dependence, physician's decision strategy, and patient's utility.诊断测试的指示范围。第二部分——测试依赖性、医生决策策略和患者效用的影响。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Oct;68(10):1129-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.017. Epub 2015 May 14.
7
The use of information graphs to evaluate and compare diagnostic tests.使用信息图评估和比较诊断测试。
Methods Inf Med. 2002;41(2):114-8.
8
Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when combining two diagnostic tests.评估两种诊断测试联合使用时诊断性能的提升情况。
Stat Med. 2002 Sep 15;21(17):2527-46. doi: 10.1002/sim.1227.
9
Diagnostic tests: a statistical review.诊断测试:一项统计综述。
Muscle Nerve. 1994 Jul;17(7):815-9. doi: 10.1002/mus.880170719.
10
A perspective on standardizing the predictive power of noninvasive cardiovascular tests by likelihood ratio computation: 1. Mathematical principles.通过似然比计算实现无创心血管检查预测能力标准化的观点:1. 数学原理。
Mayo Clin Proc. 1999 Nov;74(11):1061-71. doi: 10.4065/74.11.1061.

引用本文的文献

1
Determining the cut-off score for the Modified Barthel Index and the Modified Rankin Scale for assessment of functional independence and residual disability after stroke.确定改良巴氏指数和改良 Rankin 量表的截断分数,以评估中风后患者的功能独立性和残留残疾。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 29;15(1):e0226324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226324. eCollection 2020.
2
The validity of RFID badges measuring face-to-face interactions.RFID 徽章对面部互动测量的有效性。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Oct;51(5):2120-2138. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1180-y.
3
Solving the Diagnostic Challenge: A Patient-Centered Approach.
解决诊断挑战:以患者为中心的方法。
Ann Fam Med. 2018 Jul;16(4):353-358. doi: 10.1370/afm.2264.
4
Metabolomics Identifies Multiple Candidate Biomarkers to Diagnose and Stage Human African Trypanosomiasis.代谢组学鉴定出多种候选生物标志物用于诊断和分期人类非洲锥虫病。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Dec 12;10(12):e0005140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005140. eCollection 2016 Dec.
5
The 6-month prevalence of posttraumatic stress syndrome (PTSS) among older adults: validity and reliability of the PTSS scale.老年人创伤后应激综合征(PTSS)的 6 个月患病率:PTSS 量表的效度和信度。
Can J Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;59(10):548-55. doi: 10.1177/070674371405901008.
6
Diagnostic effectiveness of quantitative [¹⁸F]flutemetamol PET imaging for detection of fibrillar amyloid β using cortical biopsy histopathology as the standard of truth in subjects with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.特发性正常压力脑积水患者采用皮质活检组织病理学作为真实标准,评估定量 [¹⁸F]flutemetamol PET 成像在检测纤维状淀粉样 β 方面的诊断效果。
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2014 Apr 22;2:46. doi: 10.1186/2051-5960-2-46.
7
An efficient risk adjustment model to predict inpatient adverse events after surgery.一种用于预测术后住院患者不良事件的有效风险调整模型。
World J Surg. 2014 Aug;38(8):1954-60. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2490-6.
8
The methodological quality of three foundational law enforcement Drug Influence Evaluation validation studies.三项基础执法药物影响评估验证研究的方法学质量。
J Negat Results Biomed. 2013 Nov 4;12:16. doi: 10.1186/1477-5751-12-16.
9
The time-efficiency principle: time as the key diagnostic strategy in primary care.时间效率原则:时间作为初级保健诊断策略的关键。
Fam Pract. 2013 Aug;30(4):386-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmt007. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
10
Brief tool to measure risk-adjusted surgical outcomes in resource-limited hospitals.用于衡量资源有限医院中风险调整后手术结果的简易工具。
Arch Surg. 2012 Sep;147(9):798-803. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.699.