Tedeschi Roberto, Giorgi Federica, Platano Daniela, Berti Lisa, Donati Danilo
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Pediatric Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Life (Basel). 2025 Mar 6;15(3):411. doi: 10.3390/life15030411.
Groin pain is a complex and multifactorial condition commonly observed in athletes, often impairing performance and quality of life. While conservative treatments are the first-line approach, the variability in intervention protocols and inconsistent evidence necessitate a comprehensive synthesis of current knowledge. This narrative review analyzed the available literature on conservative management of groin pain in athletes. A systematic search was conducted across the MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, PEDro, and Web of Science databases. Studies focusing on pain reduction, functional recovery, return-to-sport outcomes, and prevention strategies were included. Findings were synthesized to evaluate the efficacy of conservative interventions and identify gaps in the evidence. Conservative treatments, particularly active rehabilitation and multimodal therapy, demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing pain (50-80%) and improving function, as measured by tools such as the HAGOS score. Return-to-sport rates ranged from 70% to 90%, depending on intervention type and adherence. Screening tools, including the adductor squeeze test, were effective in predicting and preventing groin injuries. However, variability in methodologies, small sample sizes, and a lack of long-term follow-up limited the generalizability of the findings. Conservative management remains a cornerstone for treating groin pain in athletes, offering effective outcomes for pain reduction, functional recovery, and injury prevention. However, standardized protocols and high-quality research are needed to enhance clinical guidance and optimize patient outcomes.
腹股沟疼痛是运动员中常见的一种复杂且多因素的病症,常常会影响运动表现和生活质量。虽然保守治疗是一线治疗方法,但干预方案的多样性和证据的不一致性使得有必要对当前知识进行全面综合。本叙述性综述分析了有关运动员腹股沟疼痛保守治疗的现有文献。我们在MEDLINE、Cochrane CENTRAL、Scopus、PEDro和科学网数据库中进行了系统检索。纳入了关注疼痛减轻、功能恢复、重返运动结果和预防策略的研究。对研究结果进行综合分析,以评估保守干预措施的疗效并找出证据中的空白。保守治疗,尤其是积极康复和多模式治疗,在减轻疼痛(50%-80%)和改善功能方面显示出显著疗效,这通过诸如HAGOS评分等工具来衡量。根据干预类型和依从性,重返运动的比例在70%至90%之间。包括内收肌挤压试验在内的筛查工具在预测和预防腹股沟损伤方面是有效的。然而,方法的多样性、样本量小以及缺乏长期随访限制了研究结果的可推广性。保守治疗仍然是治疗运动员腹股沟疼痛的基石,在减轻疼痛、功能恢复和预防损伤方面提供了有效的结果。然而,需要标准化方案和高质量研究来加强临床指导并优化患者治疗效果。