Demiroz Duygu, Colak Yusuf Ziya, Akbulut Sami, Ozdes Oya Olcay, Ucar Muharrem, Erdogan Mehmet Ali, Karakas Serdar, Gulhas Nurcin
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, 44280 Malatya, Turkey.
Department of Surgery, Liver Transplant Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, 44280 Istanbul, Turkey.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Feb 22;61(3):378. doi: 10.3390/medicina61030378.
: The most important concern regarding living donor liver transplantation is the safety of living liver donors, of which anesthesia management is an important part. Sugammadex, which has recently been used frequently for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade, is known to cause adverse effects on the coagulation profile. This study seeks to assess the impact of neostigmine and sugammadex on coagulation parameters in living liver donors following hepatectomy. We compared the demographic, clinical, and coagulation parameters of 209 living liver donors who received sugammadex (2 mg/kg) for neuromuscular blockade reversal during donor hepatectomy procedures from January 2018 to July 2022, with 209 patients who received neostigmine (50 g/kg) for the same purpose during the same timeframe. We compared the following parameters: age, gender, prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), international normalized ratio (INR), hemoglobin (Hb), platelet count, ICU stay, hospital stay, and relaparotomy for bleeding and other causes. Demographic data and preoperative biochemical values were similar in both groups. PT ( = 0.004) and aPTT ( < 0.001) values were significantly longer in the postoperative period in both groups; the difference between preoperative and postoperative PT ( = 0.009) and aPTT ( < 0.001) was significantly higher in the sugammadex group. However, neither group showed any elongation beyond the reference range. The sugammadex group had an elevated postoperative platelet count ( = 0.040). The duration of patients' stay in the ICU was significantly shorter in the sugammadex group ( < 0.001). Conclusion: The prolonged aPTT and PT associated with sugammadex did not lead to any postoperative bleeding complications. The sugammadex group significantly reduced the duration of ICU stays, while the hospital stays remained comparable. Further multicentric prospective randomized studies should support our study's findings, which demonstrate the safe use of low-dose sugammadex.
关于活体供肝肝移植,最重要的关注点是活体肝供者的安全,其中麻醉管理是重要的一部分。近期频繁用于逆转神经肌肉阻滞的舒更葡糖钠,已知会对凝血指标产生不良影响。本研究旨在评估新斯的明和舒更葡糖钠对活体肝供者肝切除术后凝血参数的影响。我们比较了209例在2018年1月至2022年7月供肝肝切除手术期间接受舒更葡糖钠(2mg/kg)用于逆转神经肌肉阻滞的活体肝供者,与同期209例接受新斯的明(50μg/kg)用于相同目的患者的人口统计学、临床和凝血参数。我们比较了以下参数:年龄、性别、凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(PTT)、国际标准化比值(INR)、血红蛋白(Hb)、血小板计数、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间、住院时间以及因出血和其他原因的再次剖腹手术。两组的人口统计学数据和术前生化值相似。两组术后PT(P = 0.004)和活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT,P < 0.001)值均显著延长;舒更葡糖钠组术前与术后PT(P = 0.009)和活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT,P < 0.001)的差异显著更高。然而,两组均未显示出超出参考范围的延长。舒更葡糖钠组术后血小板计数升高(P = 0.040)。舒更葡糖钠组患者在ICU的住院时间显著缩短(P < 0.001)。结论:与舒更葡糖钠相关的活化部分凝血活酶时间和凝血酶原时间延长未导致任何术后出血并发症。舒更葡糖钠组显著缩短了ICU住院时间,而住院时间保持相当。进一步的多中心前瞻性随机研究应支持我们的研究结果,这些结果证明了低剂量舒更葡糖钠的安全使用。