• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

即时自我反馈型简答题的开发:在多次形成性考试中应用组题反应理论

Development of Immediate Self-Feedback Very Short Answer Questions: Implementing Testlet Response Theory in Formative Examinations Across Multiple Occasions.

作者信息

Lertsakulbunlue Sethapong, Kantiwong Anupong

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, 10400 Thailand.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2024 Sep 18;35(1):205-217. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02167-w. eCollection 2025 Feb.

DOI:10.1007/s40670-024-02167-w
PMID:40144110
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11933642/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The novel Immediate Self-feedback Very Short Answer Question (ISF-VSAQ) format exhibited testlet effect due to its instant feedback feature. This study utilized the testlet-as-a-polytomous-item-modeling (TPIM), an extension of item response theory, to tackle the testlet-related challenges.

METHODS

Ninety-four pre-clinical students participated in two ten-item ISF-VSAQ exams on cardiovascular drugs based on a parallel blueprint. Each question involves clinical vignettes followed by expected answers, self-marking, and understanding levels. Messick's validity framework guided the collection of validity evidence.

RESULTS

Validity evidence included five sources: (1) Content: Experts reviews and alignment with the standard examination blueprint. (2) Response process: Students received an example and guide of ISF-VSAQ. Self-assessment steps were also explained, and all students were provided adequate time. (3) Internal structure: Higher marginal reliability was demonstrated in the TPIM model. While unidimensionality was violated in the second ISF-VSAQ, the TPIM maintained unidimensionality. Item discrimination was generally acceptable, except for one item on the second occasion with minor vignette changes. Items with new knowledge showed better discrimination and item information functions on the second occasion. (4) Relations to other variables: Path analysis shows that the first occasion's understanding and scoring abilities strongly influenced the second occasion, highlighting the testlet effect. (5) Consequences: Path analysis revealed that the understanding ability in the second attempt directly affected the summative cardiovascular ( = 0.26,  = 0.066) and comprehensive examination ability ( = 0.34,  = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

The TPIM model effectively tackles the testlet effect of the present ISF-VSAQ. Thus, when employing multiple instances of self-feedback format, analyzing it as a testlet is recommended.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-024-02167-w.

摘要

背景

新型即时自我反馈非常简短回答问题(ISF-VSAQ)格式因其即时反馈功能而呈现出组块效应。本研究采用组块作为多分类项目建模(TPIM),这是项目反应理论的一种扩展,以应对与组块相关的挑战。

方法

94名临床前学生参加了基于平行蓝图的两次关于心血管药物的十项ISF-VSAQ考试。每个问题都涉及临床病例 vignettes,随后是预期答案、自我评分和理解水平。梅西克的效度框架指导了效度证据的收集。

结果

效度证据包括五个来源:(1)内容:专家评审以及与标准考试蓝图的一致性。(2)反应过程:学生收到ISF-VSAQ的示例和指南。自我评估步骤也得到了解释,并且为所有学生提供了足够的时间。(3)内部结构:TPIM模型显示出更高的边际信度。虽然第二次ISF-VSAQ违反了单维性,但TPIM保持了单维性。项目区分度总体上是可接受的,除了第二次有一个项目的病例 vignettes 有轻微变化。具有新知识的项目在第二次表现出更好的区分度和项目信息功能。(4)与其他变量的关系:路径分析表明,第一次的理解和评分能力对第二次有强烈影响,突出了组块效应。(5)后果:路径分析显示,第二次尝试中的理解能力直接影响了心血管系统总结性考试能力(β = 0.26,p = 0.066)和综合考试能力(β = 0.34,p = 0.010)。

结论

TPIM模型有效地解决了当前ISF-VSAQ的组块效应。因此,当采用多个自我反馈格式实例时,建议将其作为一个组块进行分析。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s40670-024-02167-w获取的补充材料。

相似文献

1
Development of Immediate Self-Feedback Very Short Answer Questions: Implementing Testlet Response Theory in Formative Examinations Across Multiple Occasions.即时自我反馈型简答题的开发:在多次形成性考试中应用组题反应理论
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Sep 18;35(1):205-217. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02167-w. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Development and validation of immediate self-feedback very short answer questions for medical students: practical implementation of generalizability theory to estimate reliability in formative examination designs.发展和验证医学生即时自我反馈简答题:应用概化理论估计形成性考试设计中的可靠性的实际操作。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 24;24(1):572. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05569-x.
3
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
5
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
6
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
7
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of immediate self-feedback very short answer questions for medical students: practical implementation of generalizability theory to estimate reliability in formative examination designs.发展和验证医学生即时自我反馈简答题:应用概化理论估计形成性考试设计中的可靠性的实际操作。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 24;24(1):572. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05569-x.
2
Use of very short answer questions compared to multiple choice questions in undergraduate medical students: An external validation study.采用简答题而非选择题对医学生进行测试:一项外部验证研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 14;18(7):e0288558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288558. eCollection 2023.
3
Effective formative assessment for pharmacy students in Thailand: lesson learns from a school of pharmacy in Thailand.泰国药学学生的有效形成性评估:来自泰国一所药学院的经验教训。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 2;23(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04232-1.
4
Educator's blueprint: A how-to guide for collecting validity evidence in survey- based research.教育者蓝图:基于调查的研究中收集效度证据的操作指南。
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Dec 20;6(6):e10835. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10835. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Standard setting Very Short Answer Questions (VSAQs) relative to Single Best Answer Questions (SBAQs): does having access to the answers make a difference?标准制定 简答题(VSAs)与单项最佳选择题(SBAs)相对:是否能获得答案会有影响吗?
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Aug 23;22(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03693-0.
6
Quality of multiple-choice questions in medical internship qualification examination determined by item response theory at Debre Tabor University, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚德布雷塔博尔大学运用项目反应理论确定医学实习资格考试多项选择题的质量。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Aug 22;22(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03687-y.
7
Twelve tips for introducing very short answer questions (VSAQs) into your medical curriculum.将极短回答问题(VSAQs)引入医学课程的十二条建议。
Med Teach. 2023 Apr;45(4):360-367. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2093706. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
8
Polytomous Testlet Response Models for Technology-Enhanced Innovative Items: Implications on Model Fit and Trait Inference.用于技术增强创新型项目的多分类测试题组反应模型:对模型拟合和特质推断的影响
Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Aug;82(4):811-838. doi: 10.1177/00131644211032261. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
9
Using item response theory to appraise key feature examinations for clinical reasoning.运用项目反应理论评价临床推理的关键特征考试。
Med Teach. 2022 Nov;44(11):1253-1259. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2077716. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
10
Preparing and Presenting Validation Studies: A Guide for the Perplexed.准备和展示验证研究:给困惑者的指南。
Simul Healthc. 2022 Dec 1;17(6):357-365. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000667. Epub 2022 Apr 24.