Inoue Masanori, Ogasawara Sadahisa, Kobayashi Kazufumi, Okubo Tomomi, Itokawa Norio, Obu Masamichi, Fujimoto Kentaro, Unozawa Hidemi, Yumita Sae, Fujiwara Kisako, Nakagawa Miyuki, Kanzaki Hiroaki, Koroki Keisuke, Kiyono Soichiro, Nakamura Masato, Kanogawa Naoya, Kondo Takayuki, Nakamoto Shingo, Nagashima Kengo, Itobayashi Ei, Atsukawa Masanori, Koma Yoshihiro, Azemoto Ryosaku, Kato Naoya
Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Department of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School Chibahokusoh Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Liver Cancer. 2024 May 21;14(1):8-18. doi: 10.1159/000539380. eCollection 2025 Mar.
Macrovascular invasion (MVI) is a strong prognostic factor for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The current criteria for radiological assessment are unclear in evaluating the impact of MVI on systemic therapy. In this study, we standardized the assessment of MVI and validated its clinical relevance.
Clinical data were collected from patients with advanced HCC and MVI who received first-line systemic therapy at four medical centers in Japan. First, we used MVI progressive disease (MVI-PD) to track MVI progression and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 progressive disease (RECIST v1.1-PD) to evaluate tumor enlargement other than MVI and the appearance of new lesions. Next, we assessed the prognostic value of MVI-PD and RECIST v1.1-PD.
Of the 207 advanced HCC patients with MVI, 189 received appropriate imaging evaluation. Forty (21.2%) patients had MVI-PD and RECIST v1.1-PD, 51 (27.0%) had prior MVI-PD, and 61 (32.3%) had prior RECIST v1.1-PD. In a landmark analysis, the prognosis of 163 patients who survived more than 3 months was analyzed based on the assessment of imaging response during the first 3 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 5.4 months in those who had MVI-PD and RECIST v1.1-PD, 7.4 months in those who had RECIST v1.1-PD only, 7.2 months in those who had MVI-PD only, and 19.7 months in patients who had neither ( < 0.001). The correlation coefficients between progression-free survival and OS in patients with appropriate imaging assessments were similar for MVI-PD (0.515) and RECIST v1.1-PD (0.498).
Our findings demonstrate the link between MVI progression and poor OS in systemic therapy for advanced HCC, emphasizing the importance of an accurate method for assessing MVI progression.
大血管侵犯(MVI)是晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的一个强有力的预后因素。目前用于评估MVI对全身治疗影响的放射学评估标准尚不明确。在本研究中,我们规范了MVI的评估并验证了其临床相关性。
收集在日本四个医疗中心接受一线全身治疗的晚期HCC合并MVI患者的临床数据。首先,我们使用MVI进展性疾病(MVI-PD)来追踪MVI的进展情况,并使用实体瘤疗效评价标准第1.1版进展性疾病(RECIST v1.1-PD)来评估除MVI之外的肿瘤增大情况以及新病灶的出现。接下来,我们评估了MVI-PD和RECIST v1.1-PD的预后价值。
在207例晚期HCC合并MVI的患者中,189例接受了适当的影像学评估。40例(21.2%)患者出现MVI-PD和RECIST v1.1-PD,51例(27.0%)患者既往有MVI-PD,61例(32.3%)患者既往有RECIST v1.1-PD。在一项标志性分析中,对163例存活超过3个月的患者的预后进行了分析,分析基于前3个月的影像学反应评估。出现MVI-PD和RECIST v1.1-PD的患者的中位总生存期(OS)为5.4个月,仅出现RECIST v1.1-PD的患者为7.4个月,仅出现MVI-PD的患者为7.2个月,两者均未出现的患者为19.7个月(P<0.001)。在接受适当影像学评估的患者中,MVI-PD(0.515)和RECIST v1.1-PD(0.498)的无进展生存期与OS之间的相关系数相似。
我们的研究结果表明,在晚期HCC的全身治疗中,MVI进展与不良OS之间存在关联,强调了准确评估MVI进展方法的重要性。