• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弥漫性轴索损伤的创伤性脑损伤患者的血压变异性及预后预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究

Blood Pressure Variability and Outcome Predictors for Traumatic Brain Injury Patients with Diffuse Axonal Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Ren Christine E, Ternovskaia Anastasia, Mikdashi Fatima, Syed Hassan, Vashee Isha, Gambhir Vainavi, Chao Natalie, Downing Jessica V, Dreizin David, Tran Quincy K

机构信息

R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine-Surgical Critical Care, Baltimore, Maryland.

Oregon Health and Science University, Department of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, Portland, Oregon.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;26(2):367-377. doi: 10.5811/westjem.20346.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.20346
PMID:40145933
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11931701/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diffuse axonal injury (DAI), a feature seen in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Although blood pressure variability (BPV) has been shown to impact TBI outcomes overall, its relevance in DAI cases remains uncertain. We investigated whether 24-hour post-injury BPV and other clinical factors were linked to patient outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of Level I trauma center-admitted TBI patients with radiographic DAI diagnosis (computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging). Hospital disposition (home, nursing facility, hospice/death) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on hospital day 5 (HD5GCS) were outcomes of interest. We assessed associations with clinical factors using ordinal logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 153 patients (mean age 49 ±20 years, 74% male), median admission GCS was 5.0 (3.0-12.5), HD5GCS was 8.0 (6.0-11), and median hospital stay was 25 (15.5-34.5) days. The BPV, measured as successive variation in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and standard deviation in systolic blood pressure (SBP), was not significantly associated with hospital disposition. SBP and SBP were also not associated with our secondary outcome of HD5GCS. Initial international normalized ratio (INR) (Coefficient -3.67, odds ratio [OR] 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.00-0.70), cerebral contusion (Coeff -2.39, OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.75), and HD5GCS (Coeff 0.59, OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.30-2.49) were associated with increased odds of discharge to hospice or death. Administration of blood products (Coeff 1.06, OR 2.89, 95% CI 1.10-7.60), vasopressors (Coeff 1.40, OR 4.05, 95% CI 1.37-11.96), and hyperosmolar therapy (Coeff 1.23, OR 3.41, 95% CI 1.36-8.54), and concurrent intraventricular hemorrhage (Coeff 0.99, OR 2.70, 95% CI 0.86-6.49) were linked to poorer HD5GCS.

CONCLUSION

Blood pressure variability was not correlated with outcomes in patients with diffuse axonal injury. Low Glasgow Coma Score on hospital day 5, high initial INR, and concomitant cerebral contusion were associated with poorer outcomes.

摘要

背景

弥漫性轴索损伤(DAI)是重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的一个特征,与高发病率和死亡率相关。尽管血压变异性(BPV)已被证明会影响总体TBI的预后,但其在DAI病例中的相关性仍不确定。我们调查了伤后24小时的BPV和其他临床因素是否与患者预后相关。

方法

我们对一级创伤中心收治的经影像学诊断为DAI(计算机断层扫描/磁共振成像)的TBI患者进行了回顾性分析。医院处置情况(回家、护理机构、临终关怀/死亡)和入院第5天的格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分(HD5GCS)是关注的结果。我们使用有序逻辑回归评估与临床因素的关联。

结果

153例患者(平均年龄49±20岁,74%为男性),入院时GCS中位数为5.0(3.0 - 12.5),HD5GCS为8.0(6.0 - 11),住院时间中位数为25(15.5 - 34.5)天。以收缩压(SBP)的连续变化和收缩压标准差(SBP)衡量的BPV与医院处置情况无显著关联。SBP和SBP也与我们的次要结果HD5GCS无关。初始国际标准化比值(INR)(系数 - 3.67,比值比[OR] 0.03,95%置信区间[CI] 0.00 - 0.70)、脑挫裂伤(系数 - 2.39,OR 0.09,95% CI 0.01 - 0.75)和HD5GCS(系数0.59,OR 1.80,95% CI 1.30 - 2.49)与入住临终关怀机构或死亡的几率增加相关。血液制品的使用(系数1.06,OR 2.89,95% CI 1.10 - 7.60)、血管升压药(系数1.40,OR 4.05,95% CI 1.37 - 11.96)、高渗治疗(系数1.23,OR 3.41,95% CI 1.36 - 8.54)以及并发脑室内出血(系数0.99,OR 2.70,95% CI 0.86 - 6.49)与较差的HD5GCS相关。

结论

血压变异性与弥漫性轴索损伤患者的预后无关。入院第5天格拉斯哥昏迷评分低、初始INR高以及伴有脑挫裂伤与较差的预后相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5ed/11931701/625de1e2f6f3/wjem-26-367-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5ed/11931701/625de1e2f6f3/wjem-26-367-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5ed/11931701/625de1e2f6f3/wjem-26-367-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Blood Pressure Variability and Outcome Predictors for Traumatic Brain Injury Patients with Diffuse Axonal Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study.弥漫性轴索损伤的创伤性脑损伤患者的血压变异性及预后预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;26(2):367-377. doi: 10.5811/westjem.20346.
2
Prognostic Significance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Diffuse Axonal Injuries: Analysis of Outcomes and Review of Literature.磁共振成像在检测弥漫性轴索损伤中的预后意义:结果分析及文献复习。
Neurol India. 2022 Nov-Dec;70(6):2371-2377. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.364066.
3
Prognosis of diffuse axonal injury with traumatic brain injury.弥漫性轴索损伤伴脑外伤的预后。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Jul;85(1):155-159. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001852.
4
Diffuse Axonal Injury Grade on Early MRI is Associated with Worse Outcome in Children with Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.早期 MRI 上弥漫性轴索损伤分级与中重度创伤性脑损伤患儿的预后不良相关。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Apr;36(2):492-503. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01336-8. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
5
Traumatic midline subarachnoid hemorrhage on initial computed tomography as a marker of severe diffuse axonal injury.初始 CT 显示中线部位蛛网膜下腔出血是严重弥漫性轴索损伤的标志。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Nov 1;129(5):1317-1324. doi: 10.3171/2017.6.JNS17466. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
6
Inpatient outcomes in pediatric diffuse axonal injury: high mortality in severe TBI and limited impact of Grade III DAI.小儿弥漫性轴索损伤的住院治疗结果:重度创伤性脑损伤死亡率高,III级弥漫性轴索损伤影响有限。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2025 Mar 25;41(1):140. doi: 10.1007/s00381-025-06802-8.
7
"Don't lose hope early": Hemorrhagic diffuse axonal injury on head computed tomography is not associated with poor outcome in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury patients.“不要过早失去希望”:头部 CT 显示弥散性轴索损伤的中重度颅脑创伤患者的预后并不差。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Mar;84(3):473-482. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001733.
8
Predictors of outcome in severely head-injured children.重度颅脑损伤儿童预后的预测因素
Crit Care Med. 2001 Mar;29(3):534-40. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200103000-00011.
9
Impact of Glasgow Coma Scale score and pupil parameters on mortality rate and outcome in pediatric and adult severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective, multicenter cohort study.格拉斯哥昏迷评分和瞳孔参数对儿童和成人严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率和预后的影响:一项回顾性、多中心队列研究。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;126(3):760-767. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152385. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
10
Predictive value of positive high-sensitivity troponin T in intubated traumatic brain injury patients.高敏肌钙蛋白 T 阳性对气管插管创伤性脑损伤患者的预测价值。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Dec 1;129(6):1541-1549. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.JNS17675. Epub 2018 Jan 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Three rules for blood pressure management in acute intracerebral hemorrhage: fast, intense and stable.急性脑出血血压管理的三条规则:快速、强效、稳定。
Hypertens Res. 2023 Jan;46(1):264-265. doi: 10.1038/s41440-022-01092-y. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
2
Blood Pressure Variability and Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Propensity Score Matching Study.血压变异性与创伤性脑损伤预后的关系:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 19;23(5):769-780. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.6.55549.
3
Traumatic brain injury and intraparenchymal hemorrhage progression: Blood pressure variability matters.
创伤性脑损伤和脑实质内出血进展:血压变异性很重要。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Feb;52:119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.12.005. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
4
Viscoelastic Hemostatic Assays and Outcomes in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Literature Review.创伤性脑损伤中黏弹性止血检测与结局:系统文献回顾。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Mar;159:221-236.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.180. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
5
Diffuse Axonal Injury: Clinical Prognostic Factors, Molecular Experimental Models and the Impact of the Trauma Related Oxidative Stress. An Extensive Review Concerning Milestones and Advances.弥漫性轴索损伤:临床预后因素、分子实验模型以及创伤相关氧化应激的影响。关于里程碑和进展的广泛综述。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Oct 8;22(19):10865. doi: 10.3390/ijms221910865.
6
Contemporary insight into diffuse axonal injury.对弥漫性轴索损伤的现代认识。
Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2021 Apr 30;63(2):163-170. doi: 10.3897/folmed.63.e53709.
7
Blood pressure variability and outcome in acute severe stroke: A post hoc analysis of CHASE-A randomized controlled trial.急性重度脑卒中血压变异性与结局:CHASE-A 随机对照试验的事后分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2021 Jan;23(1):96-102. doi: 10.1111/jch.14090. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
8
Diffuse axonal injury predicts neurodegeneration after moderate-severe traumatic brain injury.弥漫性轴索损伤预测中重度创伤性脑损伤后的神经退行性变。
Brain. 2020 Dec 1;143(12):3685-3698. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa316.
9
Blood Pressure Variability: A New Predicting Factor for Clinical Outcomes of Intracerebral Hemorrhage.血压变异性:脑出血临床结局的一个新预测因子。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Dec;29(12):105340. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105340. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
10
Association Between Blood Pressure Variability and Cerebral Small-Vessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血压变异性与脑小血管病的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jan 7;9(1):e013841. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013841. Epub 2019 Dec 24.