Ayyappan Koushikk, Unger Lucas, Kitchen Philip, Bill Roslyn M, Salman Mootaz M
Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Neural Regen Res. 2026 Feb 1;21(2):534-541. doi: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-01013. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
Glymphatic flow has been proposed to clear brain waste while we sleep. Cerebrospinal fluid moves from periarterial to perivenous spaces through the parenchyma, with subsequent cerebrospinal fluid drainage to dural lymphatics. Glymphatic disruption is associated with neurological conditions such as Alzheimer's disease and traumatic brain injury. Therefore, investigating its structure and function may improve understanding of pathophysiology. The recent controversy on whether glymphatic flow increases or decreases during sleep demonstrates that the glymphatic hypothesis remains contentious. However, discrepancies between different studies could be due to limitations of the specific techniques used and confounding factors. Here, we review the methods used to study glymphatic function and provide a toolkit from which researchers can choose. We conclude that tracer analysis has been useful, ex vivo techniques are unreliable, and in vivo imaging is still limited. Finally, we explore the potential for future methods and highlight the need for in vitro models, such as microfluidic devices, which may address technique limitations and enable progression of the field.
有人提出,类淋巴系统在我们睡眠时清除大脑中的废物。脑脊液通过脑实质从动脉周围间隙流向静脉周围间隙,随后脑脊液引流至硬脑膜淋巴管。类淋巴系统破坏与阿尔茨海默病和创伤性脑损伤等神经系统疾病有关。因此,研究其结构和功能可能有助于增进对病理生理学的理解。最近关于睡眠期间类淋巴系统流量是增加还是减少的争论表明,类淋巴系统假说仍然存在争议。然而,不同研究之间的差异可能是由于所使用的特定技术的局限性和混杂因素。在这里,我们回顾了用于研究类淋巴系统功能的方法,并提供了一个可供研究人员选择的工具包。我们得出的结论是,示踪剂分析很有用,体外技术不可靠,体内成像仍然有限。最后,我们探讨了未来方法的潜力,并强调了对体外模型(如微流控装置)的需求,这可能解决技术局限性并推动该领域的发展。