• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无人机与人体碰撞的影响分析评估

Impact analysis assessment of UAS collision with a human body.

作者信息

Svatý Zdeněk, Vrtal Pavel, Mičunek Tomáš, Kohout Tomáš, Nouzovský Luboš, Frydrýn Michal, Blodek Tomáš, Kocián Karel

机构信息

Department of Forensic Experts in Transportation, CTU in Prague, FTS, Prague, Konviktská, Czechia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Mar 27;20(3):e0320073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320073. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0320073
PMID:40146764
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11949360/
Abstract

This study investigates the safety risks of Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) collisions with humans, focusing on impact dynamics through controlled crash testing. Utilizing a custom-designed drop mechanism, 49 impact tests were conducted on a Hybrid III anthropomorphic test device at various velocities and kinetic energies (7-24 m/s and 1-280 J). Tested UASs included a range of designs and weights (20 g to over 1 kg). Results demonstrated limitations in using kinetic energy models and peak head acceleration for injury prediction. The Head Injury Criterion showed greater consistency, reflecting the temporal profile of impacts. Findings revealed that UAS structural fragility reduces energy transfer at higher impacts through deformation and fracturing. This work underscores the need for improved testing protocols and nuanced safety standards.

摘要

本研究调查了无人机系统(UAS)与人类碰撞的安全风险,重点通过控制碰撞测试研究碰撞动力学。利用定制设计的跌落装置,在Hybrid III人体模型试验装置上以不同速度和动能(7-24米/秒和1-280焦耳)进行了49次碰撞测试。测试的无人机包括一系列设计和重量(20克至超过1千克)。结果表明,在使用动能模型和头部峰值加速度进行损伤预测方面存在局限性。头部损伤准则显示出更高的一致性,反映了碰撞的时间特征。研究结果表明,无人机的结构脆弱性会在更高的碰撞中通过变形和断裂减少能量传递。这项工作强调了改进测试协议和细化安全标准的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c9/11949360/d436012fc194/pone.0320073.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c9/11949360/b423ff11483a/pone.0320073.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c9/11949360/05a968451ee9/pone.0320073.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c9/11949360/6d714889158d/pone.0320073.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c9/11949360/e6030543d955/pone.0320073.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c9/11949360/f94a67427511/pone.0320073.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c9/11949360/b1d13c349abb/pone.0320073.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c9/11949360/9c6d6a01a683/pone.0320073.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c9/11949360/d436012fc194/pone.0320073.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c9/11949360/b423ff11483a/pone.0320073.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c9/11949360/05a968451ee9/pone.0320073.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c9/11949360/6d714889158d/pone.0320073.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c9/11949360/e6030543d955/pone.0320073.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c9/11949360/f94a67427511/pone.0320073.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c9/11949360/b1d13c349abb/pone.0320073.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c9/11949360/9c6d6a01a683/pone.0320073.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53c9/11949360/d436012fc194/pone.0320073.g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact analysis assessment of UAS collision with a human body.无人机与人体碰撞的影响分析评估
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 27;20(3):e0320073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320073. eCollection 2025.
2
Motorcycle helmets: head and neck dynamics in helmeted and unhelmeted oblique impacts.摩托车头盔:头盔和无头盔状态下倾斜撞击的头部和颈部动力学。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(8):835-44. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.774083.
3
Human Response and Injury Resulting from Head Impacts with Unmanned Aircraft Systems.头部与无人机系统碰撞导致的人体反应和损伤
Stapp Car Crash J. 2019 Nov;63:29-64. doi: 10.4271/2019-22-0002.
4
Head injury metric response in finite element ATDs and a human body model in multidirectional loading regimes.在多向加载条件下,有限元 ATD 和人体模型中的头部损伤度量反应。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup2):S96-S102. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1707193. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
5
Evaluation of a coplanar 6a3ω configuration in the Hybrid III 50th percentile male head.对第50百分位男性Hybrid III型头部的共面6a3ω配置进行评估。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 May 29;18(sup1):S129-S135. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1318210.
6
Bicycle helmets are highly effective at preventing head injury during head impact: head-form accelerations and injury criteria for helmeted and unhelmeted impacts.自行车头盔在头部撞击时能有效防止头部受伤:头盔和无头盔撞击的头部加速度和损伤标准。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Sep;70:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.02.016. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
7
A comprehensive experimental study on head trauma in a 3-year-old child due to unmanned aerial vehicle collisions.对一起 3 岁儿童因无人机碰撞导致头部外伤的全面实验研究。
Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2024 Mar 12;25(4):121-132. doi: 10.37190/abb-02365-2023-03. Print 2023 Dec 1.
8
Trajectory planning framework for autonomous vehicles based on collision injury prediction for vulnerable road users.基于对弱势道路使用者碰撞伤害预测的自动驾驶车辆轨迹规划框架。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Aug;203:107610. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107610. Epub 2024 May 14.
9
Differences in the protective capabilities of bicycle helmets in real-world and standard-specified impact scenarios.自行车头盔在实际和标准规定撞击场景下防护能力的差异。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 Feb 28;19(sup1):S158-S163. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1388915.
10
Bicycle helmets: head impact dynamics in helmeted and unhelmeted oblique impact tests.自行车头盔:头盔和无头盔的斜向撞击测试中的头部撞击动力学。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(5):501-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.727217.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the drone-human collision consequences.无人机与人类碰撞后果评估。
Heliyon. 2022 Nov 18;8(11):e11677. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11677. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
Ranges of Injury Risk Associated with Impact from Unmanned Aircraft Systems.与无人机系统撞击相关的伤害风险范围。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2017 Dec;45(12):2733-2741. doi: 10.1007/s10439-017-1921-6. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
3
Evaluation of the field relevance of several injury risk functions.几种损伤风险函数的现场相关性评估。
Stapp Car Crash J. 2010 Nov;54:49-72. doi: 10.4271/2010-22-0004.
4
Forensic injury biomechanics.法医损伤生物力学
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2007;9:55-86. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.060906.151946.
5
Biomechanical and scaling bases for frontal and side impact injury assessment reference values.正面和侧面碰撞损伤评估参考值的生物力学及比例基础
Stapp Car Crash J. 2003 Oct;47:155-88. doi: 10.4271/2003-22-0009.
6
Analysis of injury criteria to assess chest and abdominal injury risks in blunt and ballistic impacts.用于评估钝性和弹道冲击中胸部和腹部损伤风险的损伤标准分析。
J Trauma. 2004 Mar;56(3):651-63. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000074108.36517.d4.
7
Biomechanics of skull fracture.颅骨骨折的生物力学
J Neurotrauma. 1995 Aug;12(4):659-68. doi: 10.1089/neu.1995.12.659.