• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于对弱势道路使用者碰撞伤害预测的自动驾驶车辆轨迹规划框架。

Trajectory planning framework for autonomous vehicles based on collision injury prediction for vulnerable road users.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing Technology for Vehicle, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China.

State Key Laboratory of Vehicle NVH and Safety Technology, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute Co., Ltd., Chongqing 401122, China.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Aug;203:107610. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107610. Epub 2024 May 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2024.107610
PMID:38749269
Abstract

Due to the escalating occurrence and high casualty rates of accidents involving Electric Two-Wheelers (E2Ws), it has become a major safety concern on the roads. Additionally, with the widespread adoption of current autonomous driving technology, a greater challenge has arisen for the safety of vulnerable road participants. Most existing trajectory planning methods primarily focus on the safety, comfort, and dynamics of autonomous vehicles themselves, often overlooking the protection of vulnerable road users (VRUs), typically E2W riders. This paper aims to investigate the kinematic response of E2Ws in vehicle collisions, including the 15 ms Head Injury Criterion (HIC). It analyzes the impact of key collision parameters on head injuries, establishes injury prediction models for anticipated scenarios, and proposes a trajectory planning framework for autonomous vehicles based on predicting head injuries of VRUs. Firstly, a multi-rigid-body model of two-wheeler-vehicle collision was established based on a real accident database, incorporating four critical collision parameters (initial collision velocity, initial collision position, and collision angle). The accuracy of the multi-rigid-body model was validated through verifications with real fatal accidents to parameterize the collision scenario. Secondly, a large-scale effective crash dataset has been established by the multi-parameterized crash simulation automation framework combined with Monte Carlo sampling algorithm. The training and testing of the injury prediction model were implemented based on the MLP + XGBoost regression algorithm on this dataset to explore the potential relationship between the head injuries of the E2W riders and the crash variables. Finally, based on the proposed injury prediction model, this paper generated a trajectory planning framework for autonomous vehicles based on head collision injury prediction for VRUs, aiming to achieve a fair distribution of collision risks among road users. The accident reconstruction results show that the maximum error in the final relative positions of the E2W, the car, and the E2W rider compared to the real accident scene is 11 %, demonstrating the reliability of the reconstructed model. The injury prediction results indicate that the MLP + XGBoost regression prediction model used in this article achieved an R of 0.92 on the test set. Additionally, the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed trajectory planning algorithm were validated in a manually designed autonomous driving traffic flow scenario.

摘要

由于涉及电动两轮车 (E2W) 的事故发生率和高伤亡率不断上升,这已成为道路上的一个主要安全隐患。此外,随着当前自动驾驶技术的广泛采用,对弱势道路参与者的安全提出了更大的挑战。大多数现有的轨迹规划方法主要侧重于自动驾驶车辆本身的安全性、舒适性和动力学性能,往往忽略了对弱势道路使用者(VRU)的保护,通常是 E2W 骑手。本文旨在研究 E2W 在车辆碰撞中的运动学响应,包括 15ms 头部损伤准则 (HIC)。分析关键碰撞参数对头部损伤的影响,为预期场景建立损伤预测模型,并提出基于预测 VRU 头部损伤的自动驾驶车辆轨迹规划框架。首先,基于真实事故数据库,建立了两轮车-车辆碰撞的多刚体模型,纳入了四个关键碰撞参数(初始碰撞速度、初始碰撞位置和碰撞角度)。通过与真实致命事故的验证,验证了多刚体模型的准确性,对碰撞场景进行了参数化。其次,通过多参数化碰撞模拟自动化框架与蒙特卡罗抽样算法的结合,建立了一个大型有效的碰撞数据集。基于该数据集,使用 MLP+XGBoost 回归算法对损伤预测模型进行训练和测试,以探索 E2W 骑手头部损伤与碰撞变量之间的潜在关系。最后,基于提出的损伤预测模型,为自动驾驶车辆生成了基于 VRU 头部碰撞损伤预测的轨迹规划框架,旨在实现道路使用者之间碰撞风险的公平分配。事故重建结果表明,与真实事故现场相比,E2W、汽车和 E2W 骑手最终相对位置的最大误差为 11%,证明了重建模型的可靠性。损伤预测结果表明,本文使用的 MLP+XGBoost 回归预测模型在测试集上的 R 达到 0.92。此外,在手动设计的自动驾驶交通流场景中验证了所提出的轨迹规划算法的有效性和可行性。

相似文献

1
Trajectory planning framework for autonomous vehicles based on collision injury prediction for vulnerable road users.基于对弱势道路使用者碰撞伤害预测的自动驾驶车辆轨迹规划框架。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Aug;203:107610. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107610. Epub 2024 May 14.
2
Are riders of electric two-wheelers safer than bicyclists in collisions with motor vehicles?与机动车碰撞时,电动两轮车骑手比骑自行车的人更安全吗?
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Jan;134:105336. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105336. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
3
Kinematic responses of child as second rider of electric-two-wheelers under lateral impact with vehicle.儿童在与车辆发生侧向碰撞时作为电动两轮车的第二乘员的运动响应。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Nov;192:107258. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107258. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
4
Human error in motorcycle crashes: A methodology based on in-depth data to identify the skills needed and support training interventions for safe riding.摩托车事故中的人为失误:一种基于深入数据的方法,用于确定所需技能并为安全骑行提供培训干预支持。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(4):294-300. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1896714. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
5
Are electric self-balancing scooters safe in vehicle crash accidents?电动自平衡滑板车在车辆碰撞事故中安全吗?
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Feb;87:102-16. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.022. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
6
The safety potential of enhanced lateral vehicle positioning.增强型车辆横向定位的安全潜力。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(2):139-146. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1869224. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
7
Road safety from the perspective of driver gender and age as related to the injury crash frequency and road scenario.从驾驶员性别和年龄的角度来看道路安全与事故频率和道路场景的关系。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(1):25-33. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.794943.
8
Law compliance decision making for autonomous vehicles on highways.高速公路自动驾驶汽车的法律合规决策。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Sep;204:107620. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107620. Epub 2024 May 31.
9
Autonomous driving testing scenario generation based on in-depth vehicle-to-powered two-wheeler crash data in China.基于中国深入的车对动力两轮车碰撞数据的自动驾驶测试场景生成。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Oct;176:106812. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106812. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
10
Waymo simulated driving behavior in reconstructed fatal crashes within an autonomous vehicle operating domain.Waymo 在自动驾驶车辆运行区域内的重建致命事故中模拟了驾驶行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Dec;163:106454. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106454. Epub 2021 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical Decision-Making for Self-Driving Vehicles: A Proposed Model & List of Value-Laden Terms that Warrant (Technical) Specification.自动驾驶车辆的伦理决策:一个提议的模型和一系列需要(技术)规范的有价值术语列表。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Oct 10;30(5):47. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00513-0.