Carbone Katya, Macchioni Valentina
CREA Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, Via di Fioranello 52, 00134 Rome, Italy.
CREA Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, Via di Fioranello 52, 00134 Rome, Italy.
Ultrason Sonochem. 2025 May;116:107322. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2025.107322. Epub 2025 Mar 23.
This study investigated the effects of different drying techniques and green extraction methods on bioactive compounds in hop leaves, typically considered as waste material. Freeze-drying (FD) and oven-drying (OD) were compared for drying the leaves of five hop varieties, while the study focused on the use of microwave (MAE) and ultrasound (UAE) as innovative extraction techniques. The influence of these factors was then evaluated on several bioactive compounds, including polyphenols, flavonoids, pigments, and xanthohumol, as well as the antioxidant capacity and α-glucosidase inhibition of the extracts obtained. MAE yielded higher total polyphenol and flavan content (TPC and FLC, respectively) values than UAE. Similarly, FD samples showed higher TPC and FLC values than OD ones, whereas chlorophyll b was consistently more abundant than chlorophyll a in all samples. HPLC analysis identified catechin, epigallocatechin gallate, and p-hydroxybenzoic acid as the predominant phenolic compounds. Xanthohumol concentrations ranged from 0.04 ± 0.00 to 1.12 ± 0.03 mg g, with MAE yielding higher levels than UAE. Multivariate analysis revealed that the drying process accounted for the largest proportion of variation in the phytochemical profile (37.1 %), followed by the extraction technique (27.3 %) and hop variety (14.3 %). The hop leaf extracts showed α-glucosidase inhibitory activity, with FD samples showing greater inhibition than OD ones. PCA highlighted the significant influence of the extraction method and drying process on the phytochemical composition of hop leaf extracts. This research highlights the potential of hop leaves as a sustainable source of phytochemicals for the food, pharmaceutical, and nutraceutical sectors, and emphasises the importance of optimizing extraction and drying techniques.
本研究调查了不同干燥技术和绿色提取方法对啤酒花叶子中生物活性化合物的影响,啤酒花叶子通常被视为废料。比较了冷冻干燥(FD)和烘箱干燥(OD)对五个啤酒花品种叶子的干燥效果,同时该研究聚焦于使用微波辅助提取(MAE)和超声辅助提取(UAE)作为创新提取技术。然后评估了这些因素对几种生物活性化合物的影响,包括多酚、黄酮类化合物、色素和黄腐酚,以及所获得提取物的抗氧化能力和α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制活性。MAE产生的总多酚和黄烷含量(分别为TPC和FLC)值高于UAE。同样,FD样品的TPC和FLC值高于OD样品,而在所有样品中叶绿素b始终比叶绿素a含量更丰富。高效液相色谱分析确定儿茶素、表没食子儿茶素没食子酸酯和对羟基苯甲酸为主要酚类化合物。黄腐酚浓度范围为0.04±0.00至1.12±0.03mg/g,MAE产生的含量高于UAE。多变量分析表明,干燥过程在植物化学特征变化中占最大比例(37.1%),其次是提取技术(27.3%)和啤酒花品种(14.3%)。啤酒花叶子提取物表现出α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制活性,FD样品的抑制作用比OD样品更强。主成分分析突出了提取方法和干燥过程对啤酒花叶子提取物植物化学组成的显著影响。本研究强调了啤酒花叶子作为食品、制药和营养保健品领域可持续植物化学物质来源的潜力,并强调了优化提取和干燥技术的重要性。