Lv Junxing, Lu Qianhong, Wang Weiwei, Ye Yunqing, Li Zhe, Zhang Bin, Zhao Qinghao, Zhang Haitong, Liu Qingrong, Zhao Zhenyan, Wang Bincheng, Yu Zikai, Guo Shuai, Duan Zhenya, Zhao Yanyan, Gao Runlin, Xu Haiyan, Ge Junbo, Wu Yongjian
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
JACC Asia. 2025 Mar;5(3 Pt 2):436-452. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.07.009. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
Combined mitral regurgitation (MR) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is related to more complicated hemodynamic burdens than isolated atrioventricular valve regurgitation.
This study aimed to investigate clinical characteristics and outcomes of combined MR and TR, as well as developing dedicated prognostic instruments.
A total of 6,704 patients with ≥ moderate MR or TR from the China Valvular Heart Disease study were included in this analysis. The study outcomes included all-cause mortality, death or hospitalization for heart failure, and worsening functional status or death within 2 years.
Compared with those with isolated valvular regurgitation, patients with combined MR and TR more often experienced atrial fibrillation or flutter and pulmonary hypertension. During a median follow-up of 733 days (Q1, Q3: 706, 749 days), 624 (9.3%) deaths occurred. Combined MR and TR was related to poorer 2-year outcomes than isolated MR, and was independently associated with worse prognosis in symptomatic patients (all-cause mortality: MR vs MR+TR, HR: 0.776 [95% CI: 0.616-0.978]; P = 0.031) and those with normal left ventricular systolic function (composite endpoint: HR: 0.629 [95% CI: 0.400-0.990]; P = 0.045). Based on carefully evaluated predictors of mortality, a prognostic nomogram and a risk score were developed and externally validated for patients with combined MR and TR, with superior predictive performance than the MitraScore and comparable discrimination compared with artificial intelligence-derived models.
Patients with combined MR and TR displayed worse clinical profiles and poorer outcomes compared with those with isolated MR. The novel prognostic tools may improve personalized risk assessment of combined MR and TR.
与单纯房室瓣反流相比,二尖瓣反流(MR)合并三尖瓣反流(TR)与更复杂的血流动力学负担相关。
本研究旨在调查MR合并TR的临床特征和结局,并开发专门的预后评估工具。
本分析纳入了中国瓣膜性心脏病研究中6704例中重度MR或TR患者。研究结局包括全因死亡率、因心力衰竭死亡或住院,以及2年内功能状态恶化或死亡。
与单纯瓣膜反流患者相比,MR合并TR患者更常发生心房颤动或扑动以及肺动脉高压。在中位随访733天(第一四分位数,第三四分位数:706,749天)期间,发生624例(9.3%)死亡。与单纯MR相比,MR合并TR与更差的2年结局相关,并且在有症状患者(全因死亡率:MR对比MR+TR,风险比:0.776 [95%置信区间:0.616-0.978];P = 0.031)和左心室收缩功能正常的患者(复合终点:风险比:0.629 [95%置信区间:0.400-0.990];P = 0.045)中独立与更差的预后相关。基于对死亡率预测因素的仔细评估,为MR合并TR患者开发了一种预后列线图和风险评分,并进行了外部验证,其预测性能优于MitraScore,与人工智能衍生模型相比具有相当的辨别力。
与单纯MR患者相比,MR合并TR患者表现出更差的临床特征和结局。新型预后工具可能改善MR合并TR的个性化风险评估。