• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)对晚期胃癌患者的预测价值

Predictive Value of Preoperative Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer.

作者信息

Sun Yinwen, Sun Xiangfei, Xiong Ran, Li Chao, Zhou Yuning, Jiang Wenchao, Wang Hongshan, Gao Xiaodong

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China.

Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Wusong Branch, Fudan University, Shanghai 200940, China.

出版信息

Biomedicines. 2025 Feb 21;13(3):554. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13030554.

DOI:10.3390/biomedicines13030554
PMID:40149531
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11940243/
Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the clinical and prognostic significance of preoperative maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and GLUT-1 expression in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Medical records of patients who were diagnosed with AGC between 2018 and 2020 at Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University (Shanghai, China) were retrospectively analyzed. Finally, 182 patients were enrolled, and for each patient, SUVmax was calculated for the primary lesion on PET/CT prior to curative surgery. A total of 165 clinical tissue specimens were collected for immunohistochemical analysis of GLUT-1 expression. A total of 182 patients were divided into two groups based on their SUVmax values. The low SUVmax group comprised 92 patients. Patients with low SUVmax tended to be younger and included a higher proportion of women, with their primary tumors typically smaller or in earlier TNM stages. The median follow-up time was 52 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 90.7%, 71.4%, and 67.0%, respectively. Among them, 33 patients experienced recurrence and metastasis, and 40 ultimately died. Log-rank analysis revealed that the low SUVmax group exhibited superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis indicated that, for AGC without preoperative treatment, later stage (stage III) was independently correlated with a higher risk of recurrence (HR = 3.049; 95%CI = 1.076-8.639; = 0.036), while the low SUVmax group exhibited a reduced risk of recurrence and mortality compared with the high SUVmax group (HR = 0.565; 95%CI = 0.326-0.979; = 0.042). The clinicopathological characteristics of patients with AGC with different SUVmax values appeared significantly different. Tumor stage and SUVmax were found as independent factors affecting postoperative recurrence and death of patients with AGC.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨术前最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)和葡萄糖转运蛋白1(GLUT-1)表达在晚期胃癌(AGC)患者中的临床及预后意义。回顾性分析了2018年至2020年期间在复旦大学附属中山医院(中国上海)被诊断为AGC的患者的病历。最终,纳入了182例患者,为每例患者在根治性手术前计算PET/CT上原发灶的SUVmax。共收集了165份临床组织标本用于GLUT-1表达的免疫组化分析。根据SUVmax值将182例患者分为两组。低SUVmax组包括92例患者。低SUVmax患者往往更年轻,女性比例更高,其原发肿瘤通常更小或处于更早的TNM分期。中位随访时间为52个月。1年、3年和5年无进展生存率(PFS)分别为90.7%、71.4%和67.0%。其中,33例患者出现复发和转移,40例最终死亡。对数秩分析显示,低SUVmax组的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)更优。多因素分析表明,对于未接受术前治疗的AGC患者,晚期(III期)与更高的复发风险独立相关(HR = 3.049;95%CI = 1.076 - 8.639;P = 0.036),而低SUVmax组与高SUVmax组相比,复发和死亡风险降低(HR = 0.565;95%CI = 0.326 - 0.979;P = 0.042)。不同SUVmax值的AGC患者的临床病理特征存在显著差异。肿瘤分期和SUVmax被发现是影响AGC患者术后复发和死亡的独立因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9388/11940243/41fa58af46cf/biomedicines-13-00554-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9388/11940243/68e1919733b2/biomedicines-13-00554-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9388/11940243/316ed302bf06/biomedicines-13-00554-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9388/11940243/484dd66b122f/biomedicines-13-00554-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9388/11940243/66a25e0da42d/biomedicines-13-00554-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9388/11940243/7f8b6cf01e60/biomedicines-13-00554-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9388/11940243/41fa58af46cf/biomedicines-13-00554-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9388/11940243/68e1919733b2/biomedicines-13-00554-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9388/11940243/316ed302bf06/biomedicines-13-00554-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9388/11940243/484dd66b122f/biomedicines-13-00554-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9388/11940243/66a25e0da42d/biomedicines-13-00554-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9388/11940243/7f8b6cf01e60/biomedicines-13-00554-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9388/11940243/41fa58af46cf/biomedicines-13-00554-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictive Value of Preoperative Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer.术前最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)对晚期胃癌患者的预测价值
Biomedicines. 2025 Feb 21;13(3):554. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13030554.
2
Prognostic Value of Metabolic Information in Advanced Gastric Cancer Using Preoperative F-FDG PET/CT.术前F-FDG PET/CT评估代谢信息在进展期胃癌中的预后价值
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Dec;53(6):386-395. doi: 10.1007/s13139-019-00622-w. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
3
Pretreatment F-18 FDG PET/CT Parameters to Evaluate Progression-Free Survival in Gastric Cancer.用于评估胃癌无进展生存期的治疗前F-18氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层显像/X线计算机体层摄影(F-18 FDG PET/CT)参数
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Mar;48(1):33-40. doi: 10.1007/s13139-013-0243-3. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
4
Preoperative Standardized Uptake Value of Metastatic Lymph Nodes Measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT Improves the Prediction of Prognosis in Gastric Cancer.18F-FDG PET/CT测量的转移性淋巴结术前标准化摄取值可改善胃癌预后的预测。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jul;94(26):e1037. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001037.
5
The clinical implications of FDG-PET/CT differ according to histology in advanced gastric cancer.在晚期胃癌中,FDG-PET/CT 的临床意义因组织学而异。
Gastric Cancer. 2019 Jan;22(1):113-122. doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-0847-5. Epub 2018 Jun 9.
6
Primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on F-FDG PET/CT and mixed NSCLC components predict survival in surgical-resected combined small-cell lung cancer.F-FDG PET/CT 测量的原发肿瘤标准化摄取值(SUVmax)和混合非小细胞肺癌成分可预测手术切除的小细胞肺癌合并症的生存。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct;146(10):2595-2605. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03240-8. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
7
Predictive value of pretreatment metabolic activity measured by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic advanced gastric cancer: the maximal SUV of the stomach is a prognostic factor.氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描术测定的预处理代谢活性对转移性晚期胃癌患者的预测价值:胃的最大标准化摄取值是一个预后因素。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Jul;39(7):1107-16. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2116-x. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
8
Multiple metabolic parameters and visual assessment of F-FDG uptake heterogeneity of PET/CT in advanced gastric cancer and primary gastric lymphoma.多代谢参数和 F-FDG 摄取异质性的 PET/CT 视觉评估在晚期胃癌和原发性胃淋巴瘤中的应用。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Nov;45(11):3569-3580. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02503-9.
9
Comparing prognostic factors of Glut-1 expression and maximum standardized uptake value by FDG-PET in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.比较可切除胰腺癌患者中 Glut-1 表达和 FDG-PET 最大标准化摄取值的预后因素。
Pancreatology. 2020 Sep;20(6):1205-1212. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.07.407. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
10
Preoperative identification of clinicopathological prognostic factors for relapse-free survival in clinical N1 non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective single center-based study.临床N1期非小细胞肺癌无复发生存的临床病理预后因素的术前识别:一项基于单中心的回顾性研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Aug 28;15(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01272-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.2022 年全球癌症统计数据:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率全球估计数。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
2
Glucose metabolic profiles evaluated by PET associated with molecular characteristic landscape of gastric cancer.通过正电子发射断层扫描(PET)评估的葡萄糖代谢谱与胃癌的分子特征图谱相关。
Gastric Cancer. 2022 Jan;25(1):149-160. doi: 10.1007/s10120-021-01223-3. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
3
Correlation of F-FDG/PET SUV, SUV, MTV, and TLG with HIF-1α in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.
结直肠癌患者中F-FDG/PET标准化摄取值、摄取值、代谢肿瘤体积及总病变糖酵解与缺氧诱导因子-1α的相关性
Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2021 Jun 3;30(2):93-100. doi: 10.4274/mirt.galenos.2021.04934.
4
Correlation between glucose metabolism parameters derived from FDG and tumor TNM stages and metastasis-associated proteins in colorectal carcinoma patients.探讨结直肠癌患者 FDG 摄取参数与肿瘤 TNM 分期及转移相关蛋白的相关性。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Mar 9;21(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07944-z.
5
F-FDG PET is Superior to WHO Grading as a Prognostic Tool in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Useful in Guiding PRRT: A Prospective 10-Year Follow-up Study.18F-FDG PET 优于 WHO 分级作为神经内分泌肿瘤的预后工具,并有助于 PRRT 指导:一项前瞻性 10 年随访研究。
J Nucl Med. 2021 Jun 1;62(6):808-815. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.244798. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
6
Gastric cancer: a comprehensive review of current and future treatment strategies.胃癌:当前和未来治疗策略的综合综述。
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2020 Dec;39(4):1179-1203. doi: 10.1007/s10555-020-09925-3. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
7
Prognostic Value of Restaging F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography to Predict 3-Year Post-Recurrence Survival in Patients with Recurrent Gastric Cancer after Curative Resection.根治性切除术后复发的胃癌患者 F-18 氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描再分期对预测 3 年复发后生存的预后价值。
Korean J Radiol. 2020 Jul;21(7):829-837. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0672.
8
SUVmax of FDG PET/CT Predicts Histological Grade of Lung Adenocarcinoma.氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描标准摄取值最大预测肺腺癌的组织学分级。
Acad Radiol. 2021 Jan;28(1):49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.01.030. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
9
Prognostic Value of Metabolic Information in Advanced Gastric Cancer Using Preoperative F-FDG PET/CT.术前F-FDG PET/CT评估代谢信息在进展期胃癌中的预后价值
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Dec;53(6):386-395. doi: 10.1007/s13139-019-00622-w. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
10
Gastric cancer and image-derived quantitative parameters: Part 2-a critical review of DCE-MRI and F-FDG PET/CT findings.胃癌与影像衍生定量参数:第二部分——DCE-MRI 和 F-FDG PET/CT 研究结果的批判性综述。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jan;30(1):247-260. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06370-x. Epub 2019 Aug 7.