Alfaro-Urquiola Alhena L, Pérez Beatriz, Rodríguez-Díaz Francisco Javier, Herrero Diez Francisco Javier
Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de Oviedo, 33009 Oviedo, Spain.
Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4811322, Chile.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 2;15(3):294. doi: 10.3390/bs15030294.
The literature identifies coercive violence in dating relationships as one of the most prevalent forms of violence and a precursor to more severe types of abuse. While the relationship between the sexual double standard (SDS) and religion with intimate partner violence has been studied, there is a lack of research exploring the direct and indirect influence of religiosity through the promotion of the SDS. This gap is particularly evident when considering measurement invariance by gender, despite these variables being shaped by gender norms. Using a sample of Chilean university students, this study examined the structure and factorial invariance by gender of the Sexual Double Standard Scale (DSS) ( = 909) and the Relationship Control Factor Subscale (RCFS) ( = 855). Additionally, the study analyzed, for each gender, the impact of religiosity on experiences of coercive victimization within relationships, considering the mediating role of the SDS ( = 781). Both instruments revealed different structures by gender, leading to the development of independent models for men ( = 278) and women ( = 500). Religiosity emerged as a risk factor for victimization in both study groups. However, it also exhibited a protective effect specifically for women.
文献表明，恋爱关系中的强制性暴力是最普遍的暴力形式之一，也是更严重虐待类型的先兆。虽然已经研究了性双重标准（SDS）和宗教与亲密伴侣暴力之间的关系，但缺乏研究探讨宗教信仰通过促进性双重标准产生的直接和间接影响。考虑到这些变量受性别规范影响，当按性别衡量测量不变性时，这一差距尤为明显。本研究以智利大学生为样本，检验了性双重标准量表（DSS）（n = 909）和关系控制因子子量表（RCFS）（n = 855）的结构及按性别划分的因子不变性。此外，该研究针对每种性别，考虑性双重标准（n = 781）的中介作用，分析了宗教信仰对恋爱关系中强制性受害经历的影响。两种工具按性别显示出不同结构，从而为男性（n = 278）和女性（n = 500）开发了独立模型。宗教信仰在两个研究组中均成为受害的风险因素。然而，它对女性也有特别的保护作用。
