Suppr超能文献

追踪轨迹:不同放牧策略对管理马属动物肥胖症的影响

Tracking the Track: The Impact of Different Grazing Strategies on Managing Equine Obesity.

作者信息

Cameron Lorna, Challinor Meg, Armstrong Sophie, Kennedy Abigale, Hollister Sarah, Fletcher Katharine

机构信息

Equine Department, Hartpury University, Hartpury House, Gloucester GL19 3BE, UK.

HorseWorld, Keynes Farm, Staunton Lane, Bristol BS14 0QL, UK.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2025 Mar 19;15(6):874. doi: 10.3390/ani15060874.

Abstract

Horses evolved to live in herds, continuously moving and foraging. Domestic horses often have limited social contact and movement, with high calorific intake, contributing to obesity. "Track grazing" is an increasingly popular management system, but evidence of its impact on weight management, behaviour, and welfare is limited. Horses ( = 19) resident at HorseWorld (UK) were observed July to October 2023, monitoring bodyweight (kg), Body Conditions Score (BCS), hoof health, behaviour, and welfare indicators. Horses on track grazing systems lost significantly more bodyweight (kg) ((1,15) = 8.752, = 0.010) than their restricted grazing counterparts, although this was not supported by BCS findings which may be ineffective for subtle body weight changes. Horses on track grazing systems lost (mean ± S.D.) 10.67 ± 9.9 kg from their starting weight, whereas those on the traditional paddock systems gained 6.8 ± 13.7 kg. Hoof health and general welfare assessment scores were maintained. More behaviours in "positive", "negative", and "neutral" categories were observed in paddock system horses than those on the track grazing system, although these differences were not statistically significant. These findings suggest that horses prone to bodyweight gain can be managed effectively using track grazing systems whilst maintaining health and welfare.

摘要

马进化为群居生活,不断移动和觅食。家养马的社交接触和活动往往受限,热量摄入高,容易导致肥胖。“轨道放牧”是一种越来越流行的管理系统,但关于其对体重管理、行为和福利影响的证据有限。2023年7月至10月对居住在英国马世界的19匹马进行了观察,监测体重(千克)、身体状况评分(BCS)、蹄部健康、行为和福利指标。采用轨道放牧系统的马体重(千克)下降幅度显著大于限制放牧的马((1,15) = 8.752,P = 0.010),尽管BCS结果不支持这一点,因为BCS可能对细微的体重变化无效。采用轨道放牧系统的马体重较起始体重下降了(均值±标准差)10.67±9.9千克,而采用传统围场系统的马体重增加了6.8±13.7千克。蹄部健康和总体福利评估得分保持稳定。围场系统的马在“积极”“消极”和“中性”类别中的行为比轨道放牧系统的马更多,尽管这些差异无统计学意义。这些发现表明,对于容易体重增加的马,使用轨道放牧系统可以在维持健康和福利的同时有效地进行管理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验