• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

包皮环切术后镇痛管理中骶部竖脊肌平面阻滞与环形阻滞的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、对照多中心试验

Comparison of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. Ring Block for Postoperative Analgesia Management Following Circumcision Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial.

作者信息

Satıcı Muhammed Halit, Tutar Mahmut Sami, Kozanhan Betül, Tire Yasin, Hanedan Bülent, Aksoy İlhami, Akkoyun İbrahim, Boleken Mehmet Emin, Altay Nuray

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Konya City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, 42020 Konya, Turkey.

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Konya City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, 42020 Konya, Turkey.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 17;13(6):653. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13060653.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare13060653
PMID:40150503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11942483/
Abstract

Circumcision is the most frequently performed surgery in male pediatric patients. The postoperative period is characterized by significant pain due to the sensitivity of the foreskin and low pain threshold in children. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of sacral erector spinae plane block (S-ESPB) and ring block on postoperative face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) pain scores after circumcision in children. We also assessed the amount of rescue analgesia used, the time to the first administration of rescue analgesia, potential problems, and parental satisfaction. This study was a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial conducted at two tertiary healthcare centers in Turkey. The patients were divided into two groups: Group S (patients who received the S-ESPB) and Group R (patients who received the ring block). The primary outcome measure was the FLACC score at 1 h postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures included FLACC scores at 0, 2, 4, and 6 h after surgery, the total dose of rescue analgesia, time to first rescue analgesia, complications, and parental satisfaction. Group S exhibited significantly lower FLACC scores than Group R at all time (0, 1, 2, 4, and 6 h) points (respectively, = 0.013, < 0.001, = 0.004, = 0.006, and = 0.002). Group S required significantly less rescue analgesia and exhibited a significantly longer duration of analgesic efficacy compared to Group R ( = 0.001 and = 0.002, respectively). The S-ESPB is a safe and effective form of analgesia for managing pain following pediatric circumcision surgery.

摘要

包皮环切术是男性儿科患者中最常施行的手术。由于包皮敏感且儿童疼痛阈值低,术后会出现明显疼痛。本研究旨在评估骶棘肌平面阻滞(S-ESPB)和环形阻滞对儿童包皮环切术后面部、腿部、活动、哭闹及安抚(FLACC)疼痛评分的影响。我们还评估了补救性镇痛药物的使用量、首次使用补救性镇痛药物的时间、潜在问题以及家长满意度。本研究是在土耳其的两家三级医疗中心进行的一项前瞻性、随机、多中心试验。患者被分为两组:S组(接受S-ESPB的患者)和R组(接受环形阻滞的患者)。主要观察指标为术后1小时的FLACC评分。次要观察指标包括术后0、2、4和6小时的FLACC评分、补救性镇痛药物的总剂量、首次使用补救性镇痛药物的时间、并发症及家长满意度。在所有时间点(0、1、2、4和6小时),S组的FLACC评分均显著低于R组(分别为P = 0.013、P < 0.001、P = 0.004、P = 0.006和P = 0.002)。与R组相比,S组所需的补救性镇痛药物显著更少,镇痛效果持续时间显著更长(分别为P = 0.001和P = 0.002)。S-ESPB是小儿包皮环切术后疼痛管理的一种安全有效的镇痛方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d254/11942483/ef7d6bc5692a/healthcare-13-00653-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d254/11942483/30e7bc55f0a9/healthcare-13-00653-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d254/11942483/20dd5feb12f7/healthcare-13-00653-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d254/11942483/6e32d03c103d/healthcare-13-00653-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d254/11942483/ef7d6bc5692a/healthcare-13-00653-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d254/11942483/30e7bc55f0a9/healthcare-13-00653-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d254/11942483/20dd5feb12f7/healthcare-13-00653-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d254/11942483/6e32d03c103d/healthcare-13-00653-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d254/11942483/ef7d6bc5692a/healthcare-13-00653-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. Ring Block for Postoperative Analgesia Management Following Circumcision Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial.包皮环切术后镇痛管理中骶部竖脊肌平面阻滞与环形阻滞的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、对照多中心试验
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 17;13(6):653. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13060653.
2
Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block improve opioid-sparing perioperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung lesion resection: a prospective randomized controlled trial.超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞改善小儿胸腔镜肺病变切除术围手术期阿片类药物节省镇痛效果:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Transl Pediatr. 2022 May;11(5):706-714. doi: 10.21037/tp-22-118.
3
Erector spinae plane block versus caudal block for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial.竖脊肌平面阻滞与骶管阻滞用于小儿腹股沟疝修补术后镇痛的随机对照试验。
Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2298868. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2298868. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
4
Comparison of Caudal Block and Sacral Erector Spina Block for Postoperative Analgesia following Pediatric Circumcision: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.小儿包皮环切术后骶尾部阻滞与骶棘肌阻滞的术后镇痛效果比较:一项双盲、随机对照试验。
Urol Int. 2024;108(4):292-297. doi: 10.1159/000538323. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
5
Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Muscle Block Versus Ultrasound-guided Caudal Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgeries.超声引导竖脊肌阻滞与超声引导骶管阻滞在小儿下腹部手术中的比较。
Pain Physician. 2022 Jul;25(4):E571-E580.
6
Comparison of ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block and caudal epidural block for analgesia in paediatric patients undergoing hypospadias repair: A double-blind, randomised controlled trial.超声引导下小儿隐匿阴茎修复术竖脊肌平面阻滞与骶管硬膜外阻滞镇痛效果比较:一项双盲随机对照试验
Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Aug;68(8):725-730. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_13_24. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
7
Evaluation of USG-guided novel sacral erector spinae block for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing hypospadias repair: A randomized controlled trial.超声引导下新型骶棘肌阻滞用于小儿尿道下裂修补术后镇痛的评估:一项随机对照试验
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Apr-Jun;40(2):330-335. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_418_22. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
8
The analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block for abdominal surgery in pediatric patients - A patient and assessor-blind, randomized controlled study.超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞与超声引导下骶管硬膜外阻滞用于小儿腹部手术的镇痛效果——一项患者及评估者双盲随机对照研究
Saudi J Anaesth. 2024 Jan-Mar;18(1):55-61. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_518_23. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
9
Ultrasound-Guided Techniques for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. Quadratus Lumborum Block.超声引导技术用于腹腔镜袖状胃切除术患者的术后镇痛:竖脊肌平面阻滞与腰方肌阻滞的比较
Pain Physician. 2023 May;26(3):245-256.
10
Comparison of single-dose erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral block for pyeloplasty surgery in children - A prospective, randomized study.小儿肾盂成形术单剂量竖脊肌平面阻滞与椎旁阻滞的比较——一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Oct-Dec;40(4):686-692. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_316_23. Epub 2024 Nov 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Role of ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block for post-operative analgesia in pilonidal sinus surgery: A randomised trial.超声引导下骶棘肌平面阻滞在藏毛窦手术术后镇痛中的作用:一项随机试验
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Oct-Dec;40(4):653-658. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_226_23. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
2
Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Transperineal Approach Using Pudendal Nerve Block Versus Caudal Block in Children Undergoing Urological Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial.超声引导下经会阴途径阴部神经阻滞与骶管阻滞在小儿泌尿外科手术中镇痛效果的比较:一项随机对照试验
Cureus. 2024 Nov 22;16(11):e74244. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74244. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Comparison of ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block and caudal epidural block for analgesia in paediatric patients undergoing hypospadias repair: A double-blind, randomised controlled trial.
超声引导下小儿隐匿阴茎修复术竖脊肌平面阻滞与骶管硬膜外阻滞镇痛效果比较:一项双盲随机对照试验
Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Aug;68(8):725-730. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_13_24. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
4
Unilateral Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block: Additional Experience.单侧骶棘肌平面阻滞:更多经验
A A Pract. 2024 Jun 24;18(6):e01806. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000001806. eCollection 2024 Jun 1.
5
Comparison of the effects of ring block and dorsal penile nerve block on parental satisfaction for circumcision operation in children: randomized controlled trial.环扎阻滞与阴茎背神经阻滞对儿童包皮环切术父母满意度影响的比较:随机对照试验。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2024 Apr 8;40(1):101. doi: 10.1007/s00383-024-05681-5.
6
Comparison of Caudal Block and Sacral Erector Spina Block for Postoperative Analgesia following Pediatric Circumcision: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.小儿包皮环切术后骶尾部阻滞与骶棘肌阻滞的术后镇痛效果比较:一项双盲、随机对照试验。
Urol Int. 2024;108(4):292-297. doi: 10.1159/000538323. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
7
The effect of an ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block on the postoperative pain of lumbar discectomy: a randomized controlled trial.超声引导骶棘肌平面阻滞对腰椎间盘切除术术后疼痛的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2024 May;90(5):369-376. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.23.17830-8. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
8
A bilateral single level sacral erector spinae plane (S-ESP) block for gender reassignment surgery.用于性别重置手术的双侧单节段骶棘肌平面(S-ESP)阻滞。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2024 Jun;90(6):581-582. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.23.17955-7. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
9
Unilateral sacral erector spinae plane block for hip fracture surgery.用于髋部骨折手术的单侧骶棘肌平面阻滞
Anaesth Rep. 2024 Jan 3;12(1):e12269. doi: 10.1002/anr3.12269. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
10
Comparison of the median and intermediate approaches to the ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block: a cadaveric and radiologic study.超声引导骶棘肌平面阻滞中、间入路的比较:尸体和影像学研究。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2024 Feb;77(1):156-163. doi: 10.4097/kja.23604. Epub 2023 Nov 15.