Zoffoli Luca, Zanuso Silvano, Biscarini Andrea
Scientific Research and Innovation Department, Technogym S.p.A., 47521 Cesena, Italy.
School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Mar 14;12(3):292. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12030292.
Strength training machines incorporating advanced electro-mechanical technologies can produce hybrid resistances with variable inertia, such as a resistance that progressively changes from gravitational (inertial) to pneumatic (non-inertial) across the range of motion (ROM). To explore the biomechanical effects of these innovative resistances, a robotic chest press machine was programmed to offer three distinct inertial profiles: gravitational-type constant inertia throughout the ROM (I); no inertia (I); and linearly descending inertia across the ROM (I). Ten healthy adults performed five maximal-effort, explosive chest press movements under each inertial profile at 30, 50 and 70% of their one-repetition maximum. During each trial, muscle activity of the pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, and triceps brachii was recorded, along with force, velocity and power outputs from the machine. Statistical non-parametric maps based on two-way repeated measures ANOVA were used to assess the effects of load level and inertial profile on the collected time series. Higher load levels consistently led to increased force and reduced velocity and power outcomes over large parts of the ROM. Compared to I, I allowed for greater velocity at the expense of lower force throughout the ROM, while I produced higher force and power outputs despite having lower velocity than I. Additionally, both I and I significantly increased triceps brachii activity at the end of the ROM compared to I. I outperformed both I and I in terms of force and power. Coaches and therapists are advised to consider variable inertial profiles as a key parameter when designing exercise programs for athletes or patients.
采用先进机电技术的力量训练器械能够产生具有可变惯性的混合阻力,例如在整个运动范围(ROM)内从重力(惯性)到气动(非惯性)逐渐变化的阻力。为了探究这些创新阻力的生物力学效应,一台机器人式推胸机被设定为提供三种不同的惯性模式:在整个ROM内为重力型恒定惯性(I);无惯性(I);以及在ROM内线性递减惯性(I)。十名健康成年人在其一次重复最大值的30%、50%和70%的负荷下,在每种惯性模式下进行五次最大努力的爆发性推胸动作。在每次试验期间,记录胸大肌、三角肌前束和肱三头肌的肌肉活动,以及器械的力、速度和功率输出。基于双向重复测量方差分析的统计非参数图用于评估负荷水平和惯性模式对收集到的时间序列的影响。在ROM的大部分区域,较高的负荷水平始终导致力增加,速度和功率输出降低。与I相比,I在整个ROM内以较低的力为代价允许更高的速度,而I尽管速度比I低,但产生了更高的力和功率输出。此外,与I相比,I和I在ROM结束时均显著增加了肱三头肌的活动。在力和功率方面,I优于I和I。建议教练和治疗师在为运动员或患者设计运动计划时,将可变惯性模式作为一个关键参数加以考虑。