Frost David M, Bronson Stefanie, Cronin John B, Newton Robert U
1Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2School of Sport and Recreation, Sport Performance Research Institute New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand; and 3School of Exercise and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Apr;30(4):934-44. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001179.
Because free weight (FW) and pneumatic (PN) resistance are characterized by different inertial properties, training with either resistance could afford unique strength, velocity, and power adaptations. Eighteen resistance-trained men completed baseline tests to determine their FW and PN bench press 1 repetition maximum (1RM). During the FW session, 4 explosive repetitions were performed at loads of 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90% 1RM to assess force, velocity, and power. Participants were then assigned to a FW or PN training group, which involved three 90-minute sessions per week for 8 weeks. Both intervention groups completed identical periodized programs with the exception of the resistance used to perform all bench press movements. Free weight participants significantly increased their FW and PN 1RM (10.4 and 9.4%), and maximum (any load) force (9.8%), velocity (11.6%), and power (22.5%). Pneumatic-trained participants also exhibited increases in FW and PN 1RM (11.6 and 17.5%), and maximum force (8.4%), velocity (13.6%), and power (33.4%). Both interventions improved peak barbell velocity at loads of 15 and 30% 1RM; however, only the PN-trained individuals displayed improvements in peak force and power at these same loads. Training with PN resistance may offer advantages if attempting to improve power at lighter relative loads by affording an opportunity to consistently achieve higher accelerations and velocities (F = ma), in comparison with FW. Exploiting the inertial properties of the resistance, whether mass, elastic or PN, could afford an opportunity to develop mixed-method training strategies and/or elicit unique neuromuscular adaptations to suit the specific needs of athletes from sports characterized by varying demands.
由于自由重量(FW)和气动(PN)阻力具有不同的惯性特性,使用这两种阻力进行训练可能会带来独特的力量、速度和功率适应性变化。18名接受过阻力训练的男性完成了基线测试,以确定他们的自由重量和气动卧推1次重复最大值(1RM)。在自由重量训练阶段,分别以1RM的15%、30%、45%、60%、75%和90%的负荷进行4次爆发性重复动作,以评估力量、速度和功率。然后,参与者被分配到自由重量或气动训练组,每周进行三次90分钟的训练,共持续8周。除了用于进行所有卧推动作的阻力不同外,两个干预组都完成了相同的周期性训练计划。自由重量训练组的参与者显著提高了他们的自由重量和气动1RM(分别提高了10.4%和9.4%),以及最大(任何负荷)力量(提高了9.8%)、速度(提高了11.6%)和功率(提高了22.5%)。气动训练组的参与者在自由重量和气动1RM方面也有所提高(分别提高了11.6%和17.5%),以及最大力量(提高了8.4%)、速度(提高了13.6%)和功率(提高了33.4%)。两种干预措施都提高了在1RM的15%和30%负荷下的杠铃峰值速度;然而,只有气动训练组的个体在相同负荷下的峰值力量和功率有所提高。与自由重量相比,使用气动阻力进行训练可能具有优势,因为它能提供机会,使运动员在较轻的相对负荷下持续实现更高的加速度和速度(F = ma),从而提高功率。利用阻力的惯性特性,无论是质量、弹性还是气动阻力,都可以提供机会来制定混合方法训练策略和/或引发独特的神经肌肉适应性变化,以满足不同运动需求的运动员的特定需求。