• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于海吉斯公式的思考:调整参数能否带来更好的结果?

Considerations on the Haigis formula: Are better outcomes possible with tuning?

作者信息

Langenbucher Achim, Szentmáry Nóra, Wendelstein Jascha, Cayless Alan, Fassbind Benj, Hoffmann Peter

机构信息

Department of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg, Saar, Germany.

Dr. Rolf M. Schwiete Center for Limbal Stem Cell and Aniridia Research, Saarland University, Homburg, Saar, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Ophthalmol. 2025 Aug;103(5):e298-e309. doi: 10.1111/aos.17491. Epub 2025 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1111/aos.17491
PMID:40156502
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12235679/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To design a vergence-based lens power formula based on the classical Haigis formula for better outcomes while retaining the original formula architecture.

METHODS

Four new formula variants (A-D) incorporating a sum of segments correction for axial length, harmonic mean of corneal radii instead of arithmetic mean (all variants), and differing combinations of lower keratometer index (C, D) and an additional term (a3) representing the lens thickness in the effective lens position (B, D) were assessed in an analysis based on four datasets of IOLMaster 700 biometric data for eyes treated with the Hoya Vivinex lens (dataset 1), Alcon SA60AT lens (2), Johnson & Johnson ZCB00 lens (3), and the Bausch & Lomb MX60 lens (4). All parameters (formula constants and keratometer index) were calculated by nonlinear iterative optimisation techniques for minimising the root mean squared prediction error (RMSPE). Performance was assessed in terms of the final RMSPE.

RESULTS

All four variants showed reductions in RMSPE ranging from 2.8% to 12.6% over the original Haigis formula. For each of the four datasets, variants B and D (with the additional a3 constant) performed better in this respect than variants A and C. In all four cases, variants C and D (with the adjusted keratometer index) performed slightly better than A and B, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although not amenable to statistical analysis, the % improvements in RMSPE would appear to be clinically relevant. However, the benefit has to be proven in a prospective multicentric study with a large sample size.

摘要

目的

基于经典的海吉斯公式设计一种基于聚散度的透镜屈光力公式,以获得更好的结果,同时保留原始公式结构。

方法

在一项分析中,对四个新的公式变体(A-D)进行了评估,这些变体纳入了眼轴长度的分段校正总和、角膜半径的调和平均值而非算术平均值(所有变体),以及不同组合的较低角膜曲率计指数(C、D)和一个代表有效晶状体位置的晶状体厚度的附加项(a3)(B、D)。该分析基于四个数据集,这些数据集来自使用豪雅Vivinex晶状体(数据集1)、爱尔康SA60AT晶状体(2)、强生ZCB00晶状体(3)和博士伦MX60晶状体(4)治疗的眼睛的IOLMaster 700生物测量数据。所有参数(公式常数和角膜曲率计指数)通过非线性迭代优化技术计算,以最小化均方根预测误差(RMSPE)。根据最终的RMSPE评估性能。

结果

与原始海吉斯公式相比,所有四个变体的RMSPE均降低了2.8%至12.6%。对于四个数据集中的每一个,变体B和D(带有附加的a3常数)在这方面的表现优于变体A和C。在所有四种情况下,变体C和D(调整后的角膜曲率计指数)的表现分别略优于A和B。

结论

虽然无法进行统计分析,但RMSPE的百分比改善似乎具有临床相关性。然而,这种益处必须在一项大样本量的前瞻性多中心研究中得到证实。

相似文献

1
Considerations on the Haigis formula: Are better outcomes possible with tuning?关于海吉斯公式的思考:调整参数能否带来更好的结果?
Acta Ophthalmol. 2025 Aug;103(5):e298-e309. doi: 10.1111/aos.17491. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
2
Outcomes of zero power intraocular lenses: insights into the keratometric index and axial length.零屈光度人工晶状体的结果:对角膜曲率指数和眼轴长度的见解。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2025 May 1;51(5):388-393. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001624.
3
Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Eyes After Myopic Laser Refractive Surgery and Radial Keratotomy: Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.近视激光屈光手术后和放射状角膜切开术后眼的人工晶状体度数计算:贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun;262:48-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.09.026. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
4
Optimization of biometry for best refractive outcome in cataract surgery.白内障手术中生物测量的优化以达到最佳屈光效果。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan 1;72(1):29-43. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1219_23. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
5
Intraocular lens optic edge design for the prevention of posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery.白内障手术后预防后囊膜混浊的人工晶状体光学边缘设计。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 16;8(8):CD012516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012516.pub2.
6
Surgical interventions for bilateral congenital cataract in children aged two years and under.儿童两岁及以下双侧先天性白内障的手术干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 15;9(9):CD003171. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003171.pub3.
7
The variation in axial length in office hours causes a diopter change in the intraocular lens power calculation.办公时间内眼轴长度的变化会导致人工晶状体屈光力计算中的屈光度改变。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul;35(4):1162-1168. doi: 10.1177/11206721241304154. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
8
Performance Evaluation of a Simple Strategy to Optimize Formula Constants for Zero Mean or Minimal Standard Deviation or Root-Mean-Squared Prediction Error in Intraocular Lens Power Calculation.一种优化人工晶状体屈光力计算中零均值或最小标准差或均方根预测误差公式常数的简单策略的性能评估
Am J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan;269:282-292. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.08.043. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
9
Trifocal versus extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.白内障摘除术后三焦点与扩展景深(EDOF)人工晶状体的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 10;7(7):CD014891. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014891.pub2.
10
Capsular Tension Ring Implantation for Intraocular Lens Decentration and Tilt in Highly Myopic Eyes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.囊袋张力环植入术治疗高度近视眼中人工晶状体偏心和倾斜的随机临床试验。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug 1;142(8):708-715. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.2215.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comprehensive Evaluation of 16 Old and New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Pediatric Eyes.16种新旧人工晶状体屈光度计算公式在儿童眼中的综合评估
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug 8;18:2225-2238. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S470425. eCollection 2024.
2
Effect of Posterior Keratometry on the Accuracy of 10 Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas: Standard Keratometry versus Total Keratometry.后角膜曲率对 10 种人工晶状体计算公式准确性的影响:标准角膜曲率与总角膜曲率。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun;262(6):1829-1838. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06367-9. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
3
The effect of patient age on some new and older IOL power calculation formulas.
患者年龄对一些新的和旧的人工晶状体计算公式的影响。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug;102(5):e696-e704. doi: 10.1111/aos.16621. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
4
Accuracy of Different Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Patients With Mature Cataracts.不同晶状体屈光力计算公式在成熟期白内障患者中的准确性
Cureus. 2023 Oct 15;15(10):e47053. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47053. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Limitations of constant optimization with disclosed intraocular lens power formulae.披露了眼内晶状体功率公式的恒定优化的局限性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Mar 1;50(3):201-208. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001337.
6
Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation between Standard Partial Coherence Interferometry-Based and Scheimpflug-Based Biometers: The Importance of Lens Constant Optimization.基于标准部分相干干涉测量法和基于Scheimpflug原理的生物测量仪之间人工晶状体屈光力计算的比较:晶状体常数优化的重要性。
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 11;35(1):42-49. doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_32_23. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
7
Accuracy of 24 IOL Power Calculation Methods.24 种 IOL 计算公式的准确性。
J Refract Surg. 2023 Apr;39(4):249-256. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20230131-01. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
8
Formula constant optimisation techniques including variation of keratometer or corneal refractive index and consideration for classical and modern IOL formulae.公式常数优化技术,包括角膜曲率计或角膜折射率的变化,以及对经典和现代人工晶状体公式的考虑。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0282213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282213. eCollection 2023.
9
Evaluating intraocular lens power formula constant robustness using bootstrap algorithms.使用自助法算法评估人工晶状体屈光力公式常数的稳健性。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2023 May;101(3):e264-e274. doi: 10.1111/aos.15277. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
10
Accuracy of new-generation intraocular lens calculation formulas in eyes with variations in predicted refraction.预测屈光存在差异的眼中新一代人工晶状体计算公式的准确性
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan;261(1):127-135. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05748-w. Epub 2022 Jul 8.