• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为中风住院患者出院计划实施患者决策辅助工具:采用混合方法的过程评估

Implementation of a patient decision aid for discharge planning of hospitalized patients with stroke: aprocess evaluation using a mixed-methods approach.

作者信息

Prick J C M, Engelhardt E G, Lansink Rotgerink F K, Deijle I A, van Schaik S M, Garvelink M M, Dahmen R, Brouwers P J A M, van Uden I W M, van der Wees P J, Van den Berg-Vos R M, van Uden-Kraan C F

机构信息

Santeon, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Santeon, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2025 Jul;136:108716. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2025.108716. Epub 2025 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2025.108716
PMID:40157121
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To promote shared decision-making (SDM) during discharge planning of patients with stroke, a patient decision aid (PtDA) was implemented in seven Dutch hospitals. This mixed-methods process evaluation assessed: 1) PtDA use, 2) the SDM process, 3) facilitators and barriers influencing health care professional (HCP) adoption of the PtDA, and 4) HCP experiences with the PtDA.

METHODS

Rates of PtDA use were derived from hospital registries and PtDA log data. SDM levels in consultations were quantitatively assessed using OPTION-5 (score range 0-100); the SDM process was analyzed qualitatively. Facilitators and barriers were identified via the MIDI questionnaire. HCP experiences were explored through interviews.

RESULTS

PtDA use varied across hospitals, with 10-96 % of patients receiving it and 27-100 % of those ultimately using it. OPTION-5 scores were low in both pre-implementation (n = 68, median:0, Q1-Q3:0-0) and post-implementation consultations (n = 49, median:0, Q1-Q3:0-15). Barriers included lack of whole-team engagement and limited recognition of PtDA benefits. Frequent PtDA use was associated with HCP confidence and self-efficacy in SDM.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful PtDA implementation in stroke care requires whole-team engagement, emphasis on PtDA benefits, and enhancing HCP confidence and self-efficacy in SDM.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Highlighting positive SDM outcomes and patient benefits may encourage HCPs to adopt the PtDA.

摘要

目的

为促进中风患者出院计划期间的共同决策(SDM),在荷兰的七家医院实施了患者决策辅助工具(PtDA)。这项混合方法的过程评估包括:1)PtDA的使用情况;2)SDM过程;3)影响医护人员(HCP)采用PtDA的促进因素和障碍;4)HCP对PtDA的体验。

方法

PtDA的使用率来自医院登记处和PtDA日志数据。使用OPTION-5(评分范围0-100)对会诊中的SDM水平进行定量评估;对SDM过程进行定性分析。通过MIDI问卷确定促进因素和障碍。通过访谈探索HCP的体验。

结果

PtDA的使用在各医院之间存在差异,10%-96%的患者接受了该工具,其中最终使用该工具的患者比例为27%-100%。实施前(n = 68,中位数:0,四分位距:0-0)和实施后会诊(n = 49,中位数:0,四分位距:0-15)的OPTION-5评分均较低。障碍包括缺乏团队全员参与以及对PtDA益处的认识有限。频繁使用PtDA与HCP在SDM方面的信心和自我效能感相关。

结论

在中风护理中成功实施PtDA需要团队全员参与,强调PtDA的益处,并增强HCP在SDM方面的信心和自我效能感。

实践意义

突出积极的SDM结果和患者益处可能会鼓励HCP采用PtDA。

相似文献

1
Implementation of a patient decision aid for discharge planning of hospitalized patients with stroke: aprocess evaluation using a mixed-methods approach.为中风住院患者出院计划实施患者决策辅助工具:采用混合方法的过程评估
Patient Educ Couns. 2025 Jul;136:108716. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2025.108716. Epub 2025 Mar 8.
2
Shared decision-making supported by outcome information regarding surveillance after curative treatment for breast cancer: Results of the SHOUT-BC study.支持基于癌症治疗后监测结果信息的共享决策:SHOUT-BC 研究结果。
Eur J Cancer. 2024 Dec;213:115107. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115107. Epub 2024 Nov 2.
3
The impact of a patient decision aid on shared decision-making behaviour in oncology care and pulmonary medicine-A field study based on real-life observations.患者决策辅助工具对肿瘤学和肺病学护理中共同决策行为的影响-基于真实观察的现场研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):1121-1130. doi: 10.1111/jep.13196. Epub 2019 May 29.
4
Evaluation of the Implementation of the Dutch Breast Cancer Surveillance Decision Aid including Personalized Risk Estimates in the SHOUT-BC Study: A Mixed Methods Approach.在SHOUT-BC研究中对荷兰乳腺癌监测决策辅助工具(包括个性化风险评估)实施情况的评估:一种混合方法研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 31;16(7):1390. doi: 10.3390/cancers16071390.
5
Development of an online patient decision aid for kidney failure treatment modality decisions.开发一种在线患者决策辅助工具,用于治疗肾衰竭治疗方式的决策。
BMC Nephrol. 2022 Jul 6;23(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-02853-0.
6
Elicitation of preferences in the second half of the shared decision making process needs attention; a qualitative study.在共同决策过程的后半阶段引出偏好需要关注:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 9;20(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05476-z.
7
A shared decision-making intervention between health care professionals and individuals undergoing Pulmonary Rehabilitation: An iterative development process with qualitative methods.医疗专业人员与接受肺康复治疗的个体之间的共同决策干预:采用定性方法的迭代开发过程。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 19;19(8):e0307689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307689. eCollection 2024.
8
Does lack of deeper understanding of shared decision making explains the suboptimal performance on crucial parts of it? An example from breast cancer care.对共同决策缺乏更深入的理解是否可以解释在其关键部分的表现欠佳?以乳腺癌护理为例。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Feb;38:92-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
9
Development of a patient decision aid for discharge planning of hospitalized patients with stroke.开发一种针对住院脑卒中患者出院计划的患者决策辅助工具。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Jul 5;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02679-1.
10
A novel patient decision aid for aftercare in breast cancer patients: A promising tool to reduce costs by individualizing aftercare.一种新的乳腺癌患者康复后护理决策辅助工具:通过个性化康复后护理降低成本的有前景的工具。
Breast. 2018 Oct;41:144-150. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.06.015. Epub 2018 Jul 18.