• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非癌性妇科疾病或妊娠是颈动脉夹层缺血性卒中的危险因素吗?

Are Noncancerous Gynecologic Conditions or Pregnancy Risk Factors for Ischemic Stroke in Cervical Artery Dissection?

作者信息

Wahood Waseem, Bucak Bilal, Oakley Carlee I, Keser Zafer

机构信息

Department of Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital/University of Miami Miller, Miami, FL.

Division of Cerebrovascular Disorders and Stroke, Mayo Clinic, Department of Neurology, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

Neurologist. 2025 Jul 1;30(4):191-195. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000596.

DOI:10.1097/NRL.0000000000000596
PMID:40160110
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) was previously thought to be more common in men, but recent epidemiology studies show a disproportionate increase in the incidence of CeAD in women. In addition to sex-based differences in clinical presentation, there are unique biological risk factors for CeAD in women. Identifying risk factors for ischemic stroke in CeAD is crucial in individualizing treatment options. Herein, we utilized an inpatient cohort to investigate whether noncancerous gynecologic conditions or pregnancy are risk factors for ischemic stroke in CeAD.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample was queried from 2016 to 2020 for patients diagnosed with CeAD using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition, correction of the mean codes. Diagnoses of pregnancy/puerperium and noncancerous gynecologic conditions were identified. Among CeAD admissions, acute ischemic stroke (AIS) was also identified. Hierarchical, multivariable regression, adjusted for patient demographics and medical comorbidities, was conducted to assess factors associated with AIS.

RESULTS

A total of 34,925 women with CeAD were identified. Of these women, 2.1% were pregnant or up to six weeks postpartum, 1.3% had a noncancerous gynecologic condition, and 0.09% had both active pregnancy/puerperium and a noncancerous gynecologic condition. Noncancerous gynecologic conditions (odds ratio = 1.86, P = 0.012) were found to be an independent risk factor for AIS in CeAD but not active pregnancy/puerperium (odds ratio = 0.84, P = 0.34).

CONCLUSION

In this national inpatient sample of female patients with CeAD, the presence of noncancerous gynecologic conditions is associated with an increased risk of AIS. Further studies are needed to validate this observation and help guide the best antithrombotic treatment decisions in this patient population.

摘要

目的

颈内动脉夹层(CeAD)以前被认为在男性中更为常见,但最近的流行病学研究表明,CeAD在女性中的发病率呈不成比例的上升。除了临床表现存在基于性别的差异外,女性CeAD还有独特的生物学危险因素。确定CeAD中缺血性卒中的危险因素对于个体化治疗方案至关重要。在此,我们利用一个住院患者队列来研究非癌性妇科疾病或妊娠是否为CeAD中缺血性卒中的危险因素。

方法

使用国际疾病分类第十版修正后的平均编码,查询2016年至2020年全国住院患者样本中诊断为CeAD的患者。确定妊娠/产褥期和非癌性妇科疾病的诊断。在CeAD入院患者中,还确定了急性缺血性卒中(AIS)。进行分层多变量回归分析,并对患者人口统计学和医疗合并症进行校正,以评估与AIS相关的因素。

结果

共确定34925例患有CeAD的女性。在这些女性中,2.1%处于妊娠或产后六周内,1.3%患有非癌性妇科疾病,0.09%同时处于妊娠/产褥期且患有非癌性妇科疾病。发现非癌性妇科疾病(比值比=1.86,P=0.012)是CeAD中AIS的独立危险因素,但妊娠/产褥期不是(比值比=0.84,P=0.34)。

结论

在这个全国住院女性CeAD患者样本中,非癌性妇科疾病的存在与AIS风险增加相关。需要进一步研究来验证这一观察结果,并帮助指导该患者群体的最佳抗栓治疗决策。

相似文献

1
Are Noncancerous Gynecologic Conditions or Pregnancy Risk Factors for Ischemic Stroke in Cervical Artery Dissection?非癌性妇科疾病或妊娠是颈动脉夹层缺血性卒中的危险因素吗?
Neurologist. 2025 Jul 1;30(4):191-195. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000596.
2
Incidence Trends and Risk of Recurrent Stroke of Cervical Artery Dissections in the United States Between 2005 and 2019.2005年至2019年美国颈动脉瘤样夹层的发病率趋势及复发性中风风险
Neurology. 2025 May 13;104(9):e213548. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213548. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
3
Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection in Cervical Artery Dissections.2019 年冠状病毒病与颈动脉夹层。
Neurologist. 2024 Mar 1;29(2):71-75. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000545.
4
Long-Term Risk of Recurrent Cervical Artery Dissection and Stroke After Pregnancy.妊娠后颈内动脉夹层复发及卒中的长期风险
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2521539. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.21539.
5
Epidemiology of Spontaneous Cervical Artery Dissection: Population-Based Study.自发性颈内动脉夹层的流行病学:基于人群的研究。
Stroke. 2024 Mar;55(3):670-677. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043647. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
6
Thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy and the puerperium: a systematic review and economic evaluation to estimate the value of future research.妊娠期和产褥期的血栓预防:一项系统评价和经济评估,以估算未来研究的价值。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Mar;28(9):1-176. doi: 10.3310/DFWT3873.
7
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
8
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.择期引产的母婴结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar(176):1-257.
9
Migraine and the risk of cervical artery dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.偏头痛与颈内动脉夹层风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Stroke J. 2023 Dec;8(4):904-914. doi: 10.1177/23969873231191860. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
10
Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomaviruses to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors.接种人乳头瘤病毒预防性疫苗以预防宫颈癌及其癌前病变。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 9;5(5):CD009069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009069.pub3.