• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妊娠后颈内动脉夹层复发及卒中的长期风险

Long-Term Risk of Recurrent Cervical Artery Dissection and Stroke After Pregnancy.

作者信息

Fischer Sandro K, Kaufmann Josefin E, Metso Tiina M, Tatlisumak Turgut, Wischmann Johannes, Kellert Lars, Mayer-Suess Lukas, Knoflach Michael, von Rennenberg Regina, Nolte Christian H, Lee Cheyenne, Aldridge Chad M, Worrall Bradford B, Weko Andrew T, Southerland Andrew M, Wiggins Judea P, Majersik Jennifer J, Baumgartner Philipp, Wegener Susanne, Metanis Issa, Leker Ronen R, Cano-Nigenda Vanessa, Arauz Antonio, Frances Anabella, Bozas Ignacio, Martin Juan J, Zietz Annaelle, Polymeris Alexandros, Altersberger Valerian L, Abrignani Giorgia, Castellini Paola, Genovese Antonio, Latte Lilia, Trapasso Maria Claudia, Zedde Marialuisa, Bersano Anna, Marinoni Giulia, Silvestrelli Giorgio, Baracchini Claudio, Favruzzo Francesco, Paciaroni Maurizio, Spalloni Alessandra, Patella Rosalba, Cappellari Manuel, Valletta Francesco, Del Sette Massimo, Sassos Davide, Gentile Mauro, Magoni Mauro, Gamba Massimo, Padroni Marina, Azzini Cristiano, Giorli Elisa, Melis Fabio, Tassi Rossana, Calabrò Rocco Salvatore, Piras Valeria, Melis Maurizio, Giossi Alessia, Sanguigni Sandro, Mannino Marina, Bignamini Valeria, Gaiani Alessandra, Adami Alessandro, Bella Rita, Pascarella Rosario, Lyrer Philippe, Gensicke Henrik, Pezzini Alessandro, Traenka Christopher, Engelter Stefan T

机构信息

Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, University Department of Geriatric Medicine Felix Platter, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2521539. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.21539.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.21539
PMID:40674050
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12272292/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is a leading cause of stroke in young people and can occur during pregnancy. In women with prior CeAD, it is unclear whether future pregnancies increase the risk of recurrent CeAD, stroke, or death.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the frequency of recurrent CeAD, stroke, or death as a composite outcome between patients with CeAD who became pregnant vs those who did not.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Long-Term Risk of Recurrent Cervical Artery Dissection and Stroke After Pregnancy (LONG-RECAP) study was an international, multicenter, registry-based, explorative cohort study with data from May 1, 1990, and April 30, 2023, among patients with CeAD at 33 stroke centers across 9 countries who had at least 6 months of follow-up for whom detailed information was available on absence vs presence of subsequent pregnancies and the occurrence of outcome events.

EXPOSURE

Pregnancy after CeAD.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Composite of recurrent CeAD, stroke (any type), and death (all causes) during follow-up at least 6 months after initial CeAD. Secondary outcomes were the components of the composite outcome. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis with and without adjustment for age was used to examine the association between pregnancy and outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 1013 female patients with CeAD (median [IQR] age, 42 [35-48] years), 114 (11.3%) became pregnant during a median (IQR) follow-up of 5.3 (2.0-11.3) years. The composite outcome occurred in 10 of 114 patients (8.8%), including 7 patients with recurrent CeADs, 2 with ischemic strokes, and 1 with intracerebral hemorrhage, in the pregnancy group compared with 65 of 899 patients (7.2%), including 32 with recurrent CeAD, 26 with ischemic strokes, 4 with intracerebral hemorrhages, and 5 deaths (2 patients had 2 outcomes), in the nonpregnancy group (unadjusted hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.56-2.08; age-adjusted hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.38-1.56). Five of 10 events in the pregnancy group occurred post partum (4 CeADs and 1 stroke). Age-adjusted hazard ratios for secondary outcomes were 1.03 (95% CI, 0.43-2.46) for recurrent CeAD, 0.53 (95% CI, 0.13-2.12) for ischemic stroke, 1.01 (95% CI, 0.11-9.32) for intracerebral hemorrhage, and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.03-24.88) for death.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study of women with a history of CeAD, becoming pregnant was not associated with an increased risk of recurrent CeAD, stroke, or death. These findings may be helpful for individual counseling and family planning for women with prior CeAD.

摘要

重要性

颈动脉夹层(CeAD)是年轻人中风的主要原因,且可发生于孕期。对于既往有CeAD的女性,尚不清楚未来怀孕是否会增加复发性CeAD、中风或死亡的风险。

目的

比较怀孕的CeAD患者与未怀孕的CeAD患者发生复发性CeAD、中风或死亡这一复合结局的频率。

设计、设置和参与者:怀孕后复发性颈动脉夹层和中风的长期风险(LONG - RECAP)研究是一项国际性、多中心、基于登记的探索性队列研究,数据来自1990年5月1日至2023年4月30日期间9个国家33个中风中心的CeAD患者,这些患者至少有6个月的随访期,且有关于后续是否怀孕及结局事件发生情况的详细信息。

暴露因素

CeAD后怀孕。

主要结局和测量指标

初次CeAD后至少6个月随访期间复发性CeAD、中风(任何类型)和死亡(所有原因)的复合结局。次要结局是复合结局的组成部分。使用未调整年龄和调整年龄的Cox比例风险回归分析来检验怀孕与结局之间的关联。

结果

在1013例女性CeAD患者中(年龄中位数[四分位间距]为42[35 - 48]岁),114例(11.3%)在中位(四分位间距)5.3(2.0 - 11.3)年的随访期间怀孕。怀孕组114例患者中有10例(8.8%)发生了复合结局,包括7例复发性CeAD、2例缺血性中风和1例脑出血;未怀孕组899例患者中有65例(7.2%)发生了复合结局,包括32例复发性CeAD、26例缺血性中风、4例脑出血和5例死亡(2例患者有2种结局)(未调整风险比为1.08;95%置信区间为0.56 - 2.08;年龄调整后风险比为0.77;95%置信区间为0.38 - 1.56)。怀孕组10例事件中有5例发生在产后(4例CeAD和1例中风)。复发性CeAD的年龄调整后风险比为1.03(95%置信区间为0.43 - 2.46),缺血性中风为0.53(95%置信区间为0.13 - 2.12),脑出血为1.01(95%置信区间为0.11 - 9.32),死亡为0.90(95%置信区间为0.03 - 24.88)。

结论和相关性

在这项针对有CeAD病史女性的队列研究中,怀孕与复发性CeAD、中风或死亡风险增加无关。这些发现可能有助于对既往有CeAD病史的女性进行个体咨询和计划生育。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c57b/12272292/fac4c7c23864/jamanetwopen-e2521539-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c57b/12272292/29b35e3fc222/jamanetwopen-e2521539-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c57b/12272292/fac4c7c23864/jamanetwopen-e2521539-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c57b/12272292/29b35e3fc222/jamanetwopen-e2521539-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c57b/12272292/fac4c7c23864/jamanetwopen-e2521539-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-Term Risk of Recurrent Cervical Artery Dissection and Stroke After Pregnancy.妊娠后颈内动脉夹层复发及卒中的长期风险
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2521539. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.21539.
2
Incidence Trends and Risk of Recurrent Stroke of Cervical Artery Dissections in the United States Between 2005 and 2019.2005年至2019年美国颈动脉瘤样夹层的发病率趋势及复发性中风风险
Neurology. 2025 May 13;104(9):e213548. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213548. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
3
Are Noncancerous Gynecologic Conditions or Pregnancy Risk Factors for Ischemic Stroke in Cervical Artery Dissection?非癌性妇科疾病或妊娠是颈动脉夹层缺血性卒中的危险因素吗?
Neurologist. 2025 Jul 1;30(4):191-195. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000596.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Smoking cessation for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.戒烟对心血管疾病二级预防的作用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 8;8(8):CD014936. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014936.pub2.
6
Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection in Cervical Artery Dissections.2019 年冠状病毒病与颈动脉夹层。
Neurologist. 2024 Mar 1;29(2):71-75. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000545.
7
Epidemiology of Spontaneous Cervical Artery Dissection: Population-Based Study.自发性颈内动脉夹层的流行病学:基于人群的研究。
Stroke. 2024 Mar;55(3):670-677. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043647. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
8
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
Effects of a gluten-reduced or gluten-free diet for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.减少或无麸质饮食对心血管疾病一级预防的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 24;2(2):CD013556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013556.pub2.
10
Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomaviruses to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors.接种人乳头瘤病毒预防性疫苗以预防宫颈癌及其癌前病变。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 9;5(5):CD009069. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009069.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Errors in Affiliations.所属机构信息错误。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2532386. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.32386.

本文引用的文献

1
Pregnancy outcomes at maternal age over 45 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.45岁以上孕产妇的妊娠结局:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Apr;5(4):100885. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100885. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
2
Systematic review of postpartum and pregnancy-related cervical artery dissection.产后及妊娠相关颈动脉瘤样夹层的系统评价
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(26):10287-10295. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2122799. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
3
Antithrombotic therapy in the postacute phase of cervical artery dissection: the Italian Project on Stroke in Young Adults Cervical Artery Dissection.
颈动脉夹层后急性期中的抗血栓治疗:意大利青年脑卒中颈动脉夹层项目。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2022 Jul;93(7):686-692. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-328338. Epub 2022 May 4.
4
Cervical Artery Dissection in Young Women: Risk of Recurrence During Subsequent Pregnancies.年轻女性的颈动脉夹层:后续妊娠期间的复发风险
Neurol Clin Pract. 2021 Dec;11(6):e803-e808. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001092.
5
Aspirin versus anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection (TREAT-CAD): an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial.阿司匹林与抗凝治疗在颈动脉夹层(TREAT-CAD)中的比较:一项开放标签、随机、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2021 May;20(5):341-350. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00044-2. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
6
Maternal Stroke: A Call for Action.产妇卒中:行动的召唤。
Circulation. 2021 Feb 16;143(7):727-738. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.051460. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
7
Association between Pregnancy and Cervical Artery Dissection.妊娠与颈动脉夹层的关系。
Ann Neurol. 2020 Sep;88(3):596-602. doi: 10.1002/ana.25813. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
8
Long-term outcome of cervical artery dissection : IPSYS CeAD: study protocol, rationale, and baseline data of an Italian multicenter research collaboration.颈内动脉夹层的长期预后:IPSYS CeAD:一项意大利多中心研究合作的研究方案、原理及基线数据
Neurol Sci. 2020 Nov;41(11):3265-3272. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04464-9. Epub 2020 May 12.
9
Artery occlusion independently predicts unfavorable outcome in cervical artery dissection.动脉闭塞独立预测颈内动脉夹层不良结局。
Neurology. 2020 Jan 14;94(2):e170-e180. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008654. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
10
Determinants and outcome of multiple and early recurrent cervical artery dissections.多发性和早发性颈内动脉夹层的决定因素和结局。
Neurology. 2018 Aug 21;91(8):e769-e780. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006037. Epub 2018 Aug 1.