Armaș Iuliana, Albulescu Andra-Cosmina
Center for Risk Studies, Spatial Modelling, Terrestrial and Coastal System Dynamics, Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, 030018 Bucharest, Romania.
Department of Geography, Faculty of Geography and Geology, "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" University of Iasi, 700506 Iasi, Romania.
iScience. 2025 Feb 20;28(3):112070. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112070. eCollection 2025 Mar 21.
Starting with the end of the last century, vulnerability has gained traction as a predictable and modellable component in the risk equation. Today, its diverse interpretations and assessment frameworks reflect both the vitality of research in this area and the potential for confusion. This paper aims to enhance the understanding of vulnerability by reflecting on existing research and addressing its different nuances, ultimately guiding future vulnerability research. We provide a critical view on the evolution of vulnerability, tracing its shift from a static measure of an element's capacity to be harmed by hazards, to a multifaceted, dynamic concept. We explore various vulnerability definitions, cross-disciplinary approaches, models that integrate vulnerability, global patterns, and assessment tools. The drivers behind the shift of vulnerability from a static to a dynamic concept, together with the conceptual and operational frameworks necessary to achieve this transition, are also extensively discussed. This effort brings together snapshots of an ongoing and intricate approach to vulnerability and underscores the need for continued research.
从上世纪末开始,脆弱性作为风险等式中一个可预测且可建模的组成部分,受到了越来越多的关注。如今,其多样的解释和评估框架既反映了该领域研究的活力,也反映了可能存在的混淆。本文旨在通过反思现有研究并解决其不同细微差别,增强对脆弱性的理解,最终为未来的脆弱性研究提供指导。我们对脆弱性的演变提供了批判性观点,追溯其从衡量一个元素受危害能力的静态指标,转变为一个多维度、动态概念的过程。我们探讨了各种脆弱性定义、跨学科方法、整合脆弱性的模型、全球模式以及评估工具。还广泛讨论了脆弱性从静态概念转变为动态概念背后的驱动因素,以及实现这一转变所需的概念和操作框架。这项工作汇集了对脆弱性进行的持续且复杂研究的各个片段,并强调了持续研究的必要性。