Sheshagiri Adarsh M, Kumar Ajeet, Sinha Chandni, Kumar Abhyuday, Kumari Poonam, Kumar Amarjeet, Jha Chandan
Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Department of Anaesthesia, AIIMS, Patna, Bihar, India.
Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Mar;69(3):302-307. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_734_24. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is associated with persistent postoperative pain. Paravertebral block (PVB) is the gold standard for postoperative analgesia. A pecto-intercostal fascial plane (PIFB) block added to the pectoral nerve block (Pecs) may provide effective analgesia. This trial aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of Pecs-PIFB with PVB.
Fifty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I/II patients scheduled for MRM were randomly assigned to receive either Pecs-PIFB block with 30 mL for Pecs block and 15 mL for PIFB or PVB block with 20 mL (0.2% ropivacaine). Postoperatively, intravenous (IV) morphine was administered through a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. The primary outcome was to compare the time to the first demand dose of rescue analgesic. The secondary outcomes were postoperative 24-hour opioid consumption, pain scores (30 mins and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h), patient satisfaction score (24 h), and block-related complications. The unpaired -test compared quantitative normally distributed data, while the Mann-Whitney U test compared quantitative discrete data. A value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Patients in the Group Pecs-PIFB had an increased median time to first demand dose: 440 [interquartile range (IQR): 360-540] versus 340 (IQR: 180-360) minutes ( = 0.019) and lower median 24-h postoperative morphine consumption: 4 (3-6) versus 6 (4-8) mg ( = 0.020). Patients in the Group Pecs-PIFB had better pain scores at 30 minutes and 1 h.
Compared to thoracic PVB, the combination of Pecs and PIFB block prolonged the duration of analgesia and decreased postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing MRM surgeries. There was no statistical increase in complications in patients receiving this block.
改良根治性乳房切除术(MRM)常伴有术后持续性疼痛。椎旁阻滞(PVB)是术后镇痛的金标准。在胸肌神经阻滞(Pecs)基础上加用胸肌-肋间筋膜平面(PIFB)阻滞可能提供有效的镇痛效果。本试验旨在比较Pecs-PIFB与PVB的镇痛效果。
50例拟行MRM的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I/II级患者被随机分配,分别接受Pecs-PIFB阻滞(Pecs阻滞用30 mL,PIFB阻滞用15 mL)或PVB阻滞(20 mL,0.2%罗哌卡因)。术后,通过患者自控镇痛(PCA)泵给予静脉(IV)吗啡。主要结局是比较首次使用解救镇痛药的需求剂量时间。次要结局包括术后24小时阿片类药物消耗量、疼痛评分(30分钟及1、2、4、6、12和24小时)、患者满意度评分(24小时)以及与阻滞相关的并发症。未配对t检验用于比较定量正态分布数据,而曼-惠特尼U检验用于比较定量离散数据。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
Pecs-PIFB组患者首次需求剂量的中位时间延长:440[四分位数间距(IQR):360 - 540]分钟对340(IQR:180 - 360)分钟(P = 0.019),术后24小时吗啡中位消耗量更低:4(3 - 6)毫克对6(4 - 8)毫克(P = 0.020)。Pecs-PIFB组患者在30分钟和1小时时疼痛评分更好。
与胸段PVB相比,Pecs和PIFB阻滞联合应用可延长接受MRM手术患者的镇痛持续时间,并减少术后阿片类药物消耗量。接受该阻滞的患者并发症无统计学意义的增加。