Suppr超能文献

与传统显微镜检查相比,采用多重定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)策略改善肠道原生动物的诊断:一项对3500份粪便样本进行的为期3年的前瞻性研究。

Improvement of the diagnosis of intestinal protozoa using a multiplex qPCR strategy compared to classical microscopy: a prospective study on 3,500 stool samples over 3 years.

作者信息

Robert-Gangneux Florence, Duval Xavier, Cazala Clément, Belaz Sorya, Dupuis Anne, Guegan Hélène, Autier Brice, Gangneux Jean-Pierre

机构信息

Laboratoire de parasitologie et mycologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France.

Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé Environnement Travail), Univ Rennes, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Rennes, France.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2025 May 14;63(5):e0161024. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01610-24. Epub 2025 Mar 31.

Abstract

Commercial multiplex real-time PCR (qPCR assays) are now widely used for the diagnosis of intestinal protozoan infections, but few prospective studies evaluated their performances on large patient cohorts. We extracted data from our information system from 1 January 2021 to 15 March 2024 and included all stool samples analyzed in routine. Parasites were searched using a multiplex PCR (AllPlex Gastrointestinal Panel assay, Seegene) and microscopic examination with two concentration methods. Acid-fast staining was performed when detection was specifically requested. In total, 3,495 stools were analyzed from 2,127 patients. , spp., , and spp. were found by multiplex qPCR in 45 (1.28%), 30 (0.85%), 9 (0.25%), 310 (8.86%), and 673 (19.25%) samples, respectively, alone or in combination ( = 909). In the vast majority of cases, PCR detected a protozoan on the first stool sample. Microscopy was positive for , spp., , and spp. in 25 (0.7%), 8 (0.23%), 24 (0.68%), 22 (0.63%), and 229 (6.55%), samples, respectively, alone or in combination ( = 286 samples). No samples were PCR-/Microscopy+ for . , spp., and , while and spp. were detected only with microscopy in 6 and 20 samples, respectively. Microscopy allowed the detection of parasites not targeted by the multiplex panel (5 331 samples with non-pathogenic protozoa, and 68 samples with helminths). Overall, the multiplex PCR proved more efficient to detect protozoan parasites, but a microscopic technique should be performed when infection with (HIV-infected patients) or helminths is suspected (migrants and travelers).IMPORTANCEIn the era of increasing use of multiplex PCR panels for the diagnosis of intestinal protozoan infections, it is important to form an opinion on the positioning of those assays within a lab workflow. This study analyzes routine results obtained prospectively by microscopy and a commercial multiplex PCR over 3 years, and shows that the assay meets the expectations of a clinical laboratory for the detection of protozoan parasites of medical interest. It is recalled that is not targeted by the multiplex assay, and that microscopy still remains necessary to detect helminths.

摘要

商业多重实时聚合酶链反应(qPCR检测)目前广泛用于肠道原生动物感染的诊断,但很少有前瞻性研究评估其在大型患者队列中的性能。我们从2021年1月1日至2024年3月15日的信息系统中提取数据,纳入所有常规分析的粪便样本。使用多重PCR(AllPlex胃肠道检测试剂盒,Seegene公司)和两种浓缩方法进行显微镜检查来搜索寄生虫。当特别要求检测时进行抗酸染色。总共分析了来自2127名患者的3495份粪便样本。通过多重qPCR分别在45份(1.28%)、30份(0.85%)、9份(0.25%)、310份(8.86%)和673份(19.25%)样本中单独或联合检测到贾第虫属、隐孢子虫属、等孢球虫属、微小隐孢子虫和蓝氏贾第鞭毛虫,共909份样本。在绝大多数情况下,PCR在首个粪便样本中检测到原生动物。显微镜检查分别在25份(0.7%)、8份(0.23%)、24份(0.68%)、22份(0.63%)和229份(6.55%)样本中单独或联合检测到贾第虫属、隐孢子虫属、等孢球虫属、微小隐孢子虫和蓝氏贾第鞭毛虫,共286份样本。对于贾第虫属、隐孢子虫属和等孢球虫属,没有样本出现PCR阴性/显微镜检查阳性的情况,而微小隐孢子虫和蓝氏贾第鞭毛虫仅在6份和20份样本中通过显微镜检查检测到。显微镜检查能够检测到多重检测试剂盒未针对的寄生虫(5331份样本中有非致病性原生动物,68份样本中有蠕虫)。总体而言,多重PCR在检测原生动物寄生虫方面更有效,但当怀疑感染环孢子虫(HIV感染患者)或蠕虫(移民和旅行者)时,应进行显微镜检查。

重要性

在越来越多地使用多重PCR检测试剂盒诊断肠道原生动物感染的时代,对这些检测在实验室工作流程中的定位形成看法很重要。本研究分析了前瞻性地通过显微镜检查和商业多重PCR在3年期间获得的常规结果,表明该检测满足临床实验室对检测具有医学意义的原生动物寄生虫的期望。需要提醒的是,多重检测未针对环孢子虫,并且显微镜检查对于检测蠕虫仍然是必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cbe/12077082/b43bdacb7889/jcm.01610-24.f001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验