Manara Jonathan R, Steer Rick, Whitehouse Sarah L, Collopy Dermot, Clark Gavin W
Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Caerleon, UK.
Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Australia.
Bone Joint J. 2025 Apr 1;107-B(4):423-431. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.107B4.BJJ-2024-0956.R1.
Functional alignment (FA) and adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA) are recognized techniques for performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The native femur rolls back further on the lateral tibial plateau than the medial side during flexion, resulting in a medial pivot pattern of movement. We have assessed whether an individualized alignment technique affects the kinematic pattern observed and the clinical outcomes, when compared to a systematic alignment technique in TKA.
A total of 60 consecutive patients were randomized to a robotically assisted TKA with either FA (n = 29) or aMA (n = 31), using a cruciate-retaining (CR) implant. After definitive implantation of the prostheses, a trial pressure monitor was inserted recording contact points between the femoral component and monitor in the medial and lateral compartments as the knee was taken through a range of motion. The kinematic pattern was observed, contact pressures measured, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) assessed at 12 months.
The FA-TKA group produced a medial pivot in 58.6% of cases (17/29), symmetrical rollback in 37.9% (11/29), and a lateral pivot in 3.4% (1/29). The aMA-TKA group produced a medial pivot in 19.4% of cases (6/31), symmetrical rollback in 45.2% (14/31), and a lateral pivot in 35.5% (11/31) (p < 0.001). No differences in knee balance were recorded between the two alignment groups at any flexion point. Patients with a medial pivot kinematic pattern had superior one-year PROMs in some measures. Patients producing a lateral pivot had lower Kujala scores.
FA CR-TKA generates an intraoperative medial pivot kinematic pattern through soft-tissue balance more often than those that use aMA. Lateral pivot kinematic patterns are more commonly found with aMA. These intraoperative kinematic patterns are related to clinical outcomes, with knees producing a medial pivot performing better than those with lateral pivot.
功能对线(FA)和调整后的机械对线(aMA)是全膝关节置换术(TKA)中公认的技术。在屈曲过程中,天然股骨在外侧胫骨平台上比在内侧向后滚动得更远,从而产生内侧旋转运动模式。我们评估了与TKA中的系统对线技术相比,个体化对线技术是否会影响观察到的运动学模式和临床结果。
总共60例连续患者被随机分配接受机器人辅助的TKA,使用保留交叉韧带(CR)的植入物,其中29例采用FA,31例采用aMA。在假体最终植入后,插入一个试验压力监测器,记录膝关节在一系列运动过程中股骨部件与监测器在内侧和外侧间室的接触点。观察运动学模式,测量接触压力,并在12个月时评估患者报告的结局指标(PROMs)。
FA-TKA组在58.6%的病例中(17/29)产生内侧旋转,37.9%(11/29)产生对称后滚,3.4%(1/29)产生外侧旋转。aMA-TKA组在19.4%的病例中(6/31)产生内侧旋转,45.2%(14/31)产生对称后滚,35.5%(11/31)产生外侧旋转(p<0.001)。在任何屈曲点,两个对线组之间均未记录到膝关节平衡的差异。具有内侧旋转运动学模式的患者在某些指标上的一年PROMs更好。产生外侧旋转的患者Kujala评分较低。
与使用aMA的TKA相比,FA CR-TKA通过软组织平衡更频繁地产生术中内侧旋转运动学模式。aMA更常出现外侧旋转运动学模式。这些术中运动学模式与临床结果相关,产生内侧旋转的膝关节比产生外侧旋转的膝关节表现更好。