Bhutta Zain A, Akhtar Naveed, Harris Tim, Castren Maaret, Imam Yahia, Pathan Sameer A, Alinier Guillaume, Kamran Saadat, Cameron Peter A, Puolakka Tuukka
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Department of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Int J Emerg Med. 2025 Mar 31;18(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12245-025-00877-5.
Timely recanalization improves long-term outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (IS) patients, but most patients present outside the therapeutic window. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) can reduce pre-hospital delay and increase the likelihood of recanalization. We aim to determine the characteristic variations amongst suspected acute stroke patients using EMS.
This retrospective observational study included all suspected acute stroke patients admitted to a national tertiary care hospital in Qatar from January 2014 to September 2020. We evaluated demographics, clinical features, treatment impact, and associated factors in EMS versus non-EMS transported groups.
During the study period, 11,892 patients presented with suspected stroke. Of these, 65.1% used EMS (EMS group) for transportation to the hospital. Median age was comparable between EMS and non-EMS group [52 years; IQR 43-63 vs. 43-62, p < 0.05]. Male to female ratio was 3:1. EMS use in the Qatari population (59.2%) was relatively low. Patients with hemorrhagic stroke (82.4%) had significantly higher EMS use as compared to IS (65.7%) and cerebral venous thrombosis (64.7%); p < 0.001. Symptom onset to ED presentation time was lower in EMS users, with 41.0% arriving within 4.5 h vs. 24.3% in the non-EMS transported group (p < 0.05). Patients with unilateral weakness (66.4%), aphasia (78.2%), neglect (78.2%), dysarthria (68.4%), loss of consciousness (83.3%), and seizures (83.9%) were more likely to use EMS than alternative modes of transportation. Patients attending via EMS had higher rates of thrombolysis than others (82.4% vs. 17.6%; p < 0.001) and a shorter door-to-needle time (56.4 ± 38.2 min vs. 75.7 ± 43.8 min; p < 0.001).
EMS utilization in acute stroke patients was high and was associated with rapid and higher rates of therapeutic intervention. However, younger age, Arab ethnicity, and less obvious stroke symptoms were associated with lower EMS use, emphasizing the need for targeted public health interventions to improve EMS activations.
及时再灌注可改善急性缺血性卒中(IS)患者的长期预后,但大多数患者在治疗窗之外就诊。紧急医疗服务(EMS)可减少院前延误并增加再灌注的可能性。我们旨在确定使用EMS的疑似急性卒中患者的特征差异。
这项回顾性观察性研究纳入了2014年1月至2020年9月在卡塔尔一家国家三级护理医院收治的所有疑似急性卒中患者。我们评估了使用EMS和未使用EMS转运组的人口统计学、临床特征、治疗影响及相关因素。
在研究期间,11892例患者表现出疑似卒中症状。其中,65.1%使用EMS(EMS组)转运至医院。EMS组和非EMS组的中位年龄相当[52岁;四分位间距43 - 63岁对43 - 62岁,p < 0.05]。男女比例为3:1。卡塔尔人群中EMS的使用率(59.2%)相对较低。与IS(65.7%)和脑静脉血栓形成(64.7%)相比,出血性卒中患者的EMS使用率显著更高(82.4%);p < 0.001。EMS使用者从症状发作到急诊科就诊的时间更短,41.0%的患者在4.5小时内到达,而非EMS转运组为24.3%(p < 0.05)。与其他交通方式相比,出现单侧肢体无力(66.4%)、失语(78.2%)、忽视(78.2%)、构音障碍(68.4%)、意识丧失(83.3%)和癫痫发作(83.9%)的患者更有可能使用EMS。通过EMS就诊的患者溶栓率高于其他患者(82.4%对17.6%;p < 0.001),且门到针时间更短(56.4 ± 38.2分钟对75.7 ± 43.8分钟;p < 0.001)。
急性卒中患者中EMS的利用率较高,且与快速和更高的治疗干预率相关。然而,年龄较小、阿拉伯族裔以及卒中症状不明显与较低的EMS使用率相关,这强调了需要有针对性的公共卫生干预措施来提高EMS的启动率。