Nummedal Målfrid Asheim, King Sarah Elizabeth, Uleberg Oddvar, Pedersen Sindre Andre, Bjørnsen Lars Petter
Trondheim Emergency Department Research Group (TEDRG), Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Clinic of Emergency Medicine and Prehospital Care, St. Olav's Hospital - Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Int J Emerg Med. 2024 May 3;17(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00638-w.
Emergency department (ED) crowding is a common healthcare issue with multiple causes. One important knowledge area is understanding where patients arrived from and what care they received prior to ED admission. This information could be used to inform strategies to provide care for low acuity patients outside of the hospital and reduce unnecessary ED admissions. The aim of this scoping review was to provide a comprehensive overview of global published research examining the acute care trajectory of all ED patients.
The scoping review was performed according to the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and the PRISMA-SCR checklist. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify studies describing where patients arrived from and/or whose pathway of care was before an ED visit. The search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception through December 5th, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the records.
Out of the 6,465 records screened, 14 studies from Australia, Canada, Haiti, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Belgium, Indonesia, and the UK met the inclusion criteria. Four studies reported on where patients physically arrived from, ten reported how patients were transported, six reported who referred them, and six reported whether medical care or advice was sought prior to visiting an ED.
This scoping review revealed a lack of studies describing patients' pathways to the ED. However, studies from some countries indicate that a relatively large proportion of patients first seek care or guidance from a primary care physician (PCP) before visiting an ED. However, further research and published data are needed. To improve the situation, we recommend the development and implementation of a template for the uniform reporting of factors outside the ED, including where the patient journey began, which healthcare facilities they visited, who referred them to the ED, and how they arrived.
急诊科拥挤是一个常见的医疗保健问题,原因多种多样。一个重要的知识领域是了解患者来自何处以及在急诊科入院前接受了何种治疗。这些信息可用于为在医院外为低急症患者提供护理的策略提供依据,并减少不必要的急诊科入院。本范围综述的目的是全面概述全球已发表的研究,这些研究考察了所有急诊科患者的急性护理轨迹。
本范围综述按照JBI循证综合手册和PRISMA-SCR清单进行。进行了全面的文献检索,以识别描述患者来自何处和/或其就诊前护理路径的研究。检索在MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行,时间跨度从创刊至2022年12月5日。两名评审员独立筛选记录。
在筛选的6465条记录中,来自澳大利亚、加拿大、海地、挪威、瑞典、瑞士、比利时、印度尼西亚和英国的14项研究符合纳入标准。四项研究报告了患者实际来自何处,十项报告了患者的运输方式,六项报告了谁转诊了他们,六项报告了在就诊急诊科之前是否寻求过医疗护理或建议。
本范围综述显示缺乏描述患者前往急诊科路径的研究。然而,一些国家的研究表明,相当大比例的患者在就诊急诊科之前首先会寻求初级保健医生(PCP)的护理或指导作用。然而,还需要进一步的研究和已发表的数据。为改善这种情况,我们建议制定并实施一个模板,用于统一报告急诊科外部的因素,包括患者旅程从何处开始、他们就诊了哪些医疗机构、谁将他们转诊至急诊科以及他们如何到达。