• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期预警系统评分在预测老年患者与年轻患者术后并发症方面的表现。

Performance of the early warning system score in predicting postoperative complications in older versus younger patients.

作者信息

Stolze Annick, Vernooij Lisette, de Korte-de Boer Dianne, Hollmann Markus W, Buhre Wolfgang F F A, Boer Christa, Noordzij Peter G

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Management, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Perioper Med (Lond). 2025 Apr 1;14(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13741-025-00516-w.

DOI:10.1186/s13741-025-00516-w
PMID:40165340
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11959713/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early warning system (EWS) scores are implemented on surgical wards to identify patients at high risk of postoperative clinical deterioration, but its predictive value in older patients is unclear. This study assessed the prognostic value of EWS scores to predict severe postoperative complications in older patients compared to younger patients.

METHODS

This study utilized data from the TRACE study. EWS scores were routinely measured on postoperative days one (POD1) and three (POD3). The cohort was divided by age: < 70 years and ≥ 70 years. Performance measures of EWS scores on POD1 and POD3 were assessed to predict severe postoperative complications. Missed event rates (proportion of events not detected by the EWS threshold) and nonevent rates (proportion of EWS values above the threshold without an adverse event) were calculated.

RESULTS

Among 4866 patients, 39.3% were ≥ 70 years old. Severe complications occurred in 6.1% of older compared to 5.8% of younger patients (P = 0.658). EWS scores on POD1 and POD3 did not differ between age groups. For severe complications, EWS showed moderate discrimination in both older (POD1: C-statistic 0.65 (95%CI 0.59-0.70); POD3: 0.63 (95%CI 0.57-0.69)) and younger patients (POD1: 0.68 (95%CI 0.65-0.72); POD3: 0.65 (95%CI 0.61-0.70)). Overall, calibration was good. For EWS score ≥ 3, the missed event rate was at least 69% and nonevent rate 75%.

CONCLUSIONS

Predicted performance of the EWS score was moderate among older and younger patients. A limitation of the EWS score is the high rate of missed events and nonevents.

摘要

背景

手术病房采用早期预警系统(EWS)评分来识别术后临床病情恶化风险较高的患者,但其在老年患者中的预测价值尚不清楚。本研究评估了EWS评分与年轻患者相比,对预测老年患者术后严重并发症的预后价值。

方法

本研究使用了TRACE研究的数据。在术后第1天(POD1)和第3天(POD3)常规测量EWS评分。根据年龄将队列分为:<70岁和≥70岁。评估POD1和POD3时EWS评分的性能指标,以预测术后严重并发症。计算漏诊事件率(EWS阈值未检测到的事件比例)和无事件率(EWS值高于阈值且无不良事件的比例)。

结果

在4866例患者中,39.3%的患者年龄≥70岁。老年患者中严重并发症的发生率为6.1%,而年轻患者为5.8%(P = 0.658)。POD1和POD3时的EWS评分在不同年龄组之间没有差异。对于严重并发症,EWS在老年患者(POD1:C统计量0.65(95%CI 0.59 - 0.70);POD3:0.63(95%CI 0.57 - 0.69))和年轻患者(POD1:0.68(95%CI 0.65 - 0.72);POD3:0.65(95%CI 0.61 - 0.70))中均显示出中等区分能力。总体而言,校准良好。对于EWS评分≥3,漏诊事件率至少为69%,无事件率为75%。

结论

EWS评分在老年和年轻患者中的预测性能中等。EWS评分的一个局限性是漏诊事件和无事件的发生率较高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ca0/11959713/1c4b3a6179e7/13741_2025_516_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ca0/11959713/3794d7310454/13741_2025_516_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ca0/11959713/1c4b3a6179e7/13741_2025_516_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ca0/11959713/3794d7310454/13741_2025_516_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ca0/11959713/1c4b3a6179e7/13741_2025_516_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance of the early warning system score in predicting postoperative complications in older versus younger patients.早期预警系统评分在预测老年患者与年轻患者术后并发症方面的表现。
Perioper Med (Lond). 2025 Apr 1;14(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13741-025-00516-w.
2
Early Warning Scores to Support Continuous Wireless Vital Sign Monitoring for Complication Prediction in Patients on Surgical Wards: Retrospective Observational Study.用于支持手术病房患者并发症预测的连续无线生命体征监测的早期预警评分:回顾性观察研究
JMIR Perioper Med. 2023 Aug 30;6:e44483. doi: 10.2196/44483.
3
Performance of 21 Early Warning System scores in predicting in-hospital deterioration among undifferentiated admitted patients managed by ambulance services.21 种早期预警系统评分在预测由救护车服务管理的未明确诊断的入院患者住院期间恶化的表现。
Emerg Med J. 2024 Jul 22;41(8):481-487. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213708.
4
Effectiveness of Remote Patient Monitoring Equipped With an Early Warning System in Tertiary Care Hospital Wards: Retrospective Cohort Study.配备早期预警系统的远程患者监测在三级医院病房中的有效性:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 15;27:e56463. doi: 10.2196/56463.
5
Deep Learning-Based Early Warning Score for Predicting Clinical Deterioration in General Ward Cancer Patients.基于深度学习的普通病房癌症患者临床恶化预测预警评分
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 26;15(21):5145. doi: 10.3390/cancers15215145.
6
Comparison of the Aotearoa New Zealand Early Warning Score and National Early Warning Score to predict adverse inpatient events in a vital sign dataset.奥塔哥新西兰预警评分与国家预警评分在生命体征数据集预测不良住院事件中的比较。
Anaesthesia. 2023 Jul;78(7):830-839. doi: 10.1111/anae.16007. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
7
A Role for the Early Warning Score in Early Identification of Critical Postoperative Complications.早期预警评分在术后危急并发症早期识别中的作用
Ann Surg. 2016 May;263(5):918-23. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001514.
8
Variation in nurses' compliance with an Early Warning Score protocol: A retrospective cohort study.护士对早期预警评分方案依从性的差异:一项回顾性队列研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 13;10(16):e36147. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36147. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.
9
Safety and efficacy of low-dose esketamine weakly opioidized anesthesia in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing surgery: a prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial.低剂量艾司氯胺酮联合弱阿片类药物麻醉在老年腰椎管狭窄症手术患者中的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性、双盲随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Feb 5;25(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-02908-3.
10
Improving recognition of patients at risk in a Portuguese general hospital: results from a preliminary study on the early warning score.提高葡萄牙一家综合医院对高危患者的识别能力:早期预警评分初步研究结果
Int J Emerg Med. 2014 Jul 10;7:22. doi: 10.1186/s12245-014-0022-7. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Initiatives to detect and prevent death from perioperative deterioration.针对围手术期恶化导致的死亡进行检测和预防的措施。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2023 Dec 1;36(6):676-682. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001312. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
2
Routine Postsurgical Anesthesia Visit to Improve 30-day Morbidity and Mortality: A Multicenter, Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Interventional Study (The TRACE Study).常规术后麻醉访视以改善 30 天发病率和死亡率:一项多中心、阶梯式楔形集群随机干预研究(TRACE 研究)。
Ann Surg. 2023 Mar 1;277(3):375-380. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004954. Epub 2021 May 24.
3
Frailty for Perioperative Clinicians: A Narrative Review.
围手术期临床医生的衰弱评估:一项叙事性综述。
Anesth Analg. 2020 Jun;130(6):1450-1460. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004602.
4
[Postoperative remote monitoring].[术后远程监测]
Anaesthesist. 2020 Jan;69(1):3-10. doi: 10.1007/s00101-019-00693-6.
5
Effects of the frailty phenotype on post-operative complications in older surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.衰弱表型对老年外科手术患者术后并发症的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 May 24;19(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1153-8.
6
Validating the Electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage (eCART) Score for Risk Stratification of Surgical Inpatients in the Postoperative Setting: Retrospective Cohort Study.验证电子心脏骤停风险分诊(eCART)评分在术后环境下对手术住院患者进行风险分层的有效性:回顾性队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jun;269(6):1059-1063. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002665.
7
Wireless and continuous monitoring of vital signs in patients at the general ward.普通病房患者生命体征的无线和连续监测。
Resuscitation. 2019 Mar;136:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.01.017. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
8
TRACE (Routine posTsuRgical Anesthesia visit to improve patient outComE): a prospective, multicenter, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized interventional study.TRACE(改善患者结局的常规术后麻醉访视):一项前瞻性、多中心、阶梯楔形、整群随机干预研究。
Trials. 2018 Oct 26;19(1):586. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2952-5.
9
Frailty in surgical patients.外科患者的衰弱
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Dec;33(12):1657-1666. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3163-y. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
10
Early warning scores in the perioperative period: applications and clinical operating characteristics.围手术期预警评分:应用及临床操作特征
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018 Dec;31(6):732-738. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000657.