Suppr超能文献

血液透析成年患者虚拟多学科团队会议模式的评估:一项定性研究。

Evaluation of the Virtual Multidisciplinary Team Meeting Model for Adult Patients on Haemodialysis: A Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Wang Qiumian, Jokwiro Yangama, Zimbudzi Edward

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia.

Chronic and Complex Care Renal Services, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Apr;31(3):e70071. doi: 10.1111/jep.70071.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the COVID-19 pandemic, face-to-face multidisciplinary team meetings evolved to virtual platforms. Healthcare professionals' experiences of virtual multidisciplinary team meetings is unknown, and it is not clear whether virtual meetings are a feasible long-term alternative in the post pandemic era.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the experiences and perceptions of members of the multidisciplinary team managing people with kidney disease regarding virtual meetings.

DESIGN

Semi-structured interviews were conducted. Maximal variation sampling was used to ensure adequate representation by gender and professional roles. All interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim, before being analysed by two researchers independently using the Theoretical Domains Framework. A third researcher was then referred to for resolving any disagreements.

PARTICIPANTS

Members of the nephrology multidisciplinary team meeting.

MEASUREMENTS

Health professionals' experiences and perspectives of virtual multidisciplinary team meetings.

RESULTS

Of the nine participants interviewed, six were females and the majority were nurses. Most of the participants were aged 30-40 years. Three main themes emerged within the three primary domains: impact on staff and patient outcomes; limited technological skills, and opportunities for improvement. From the four intermediate domains, another four themes were captured: professional responsibility; impact on engagement; barriers to participation; and desire to provide optimal patient care.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare professionals of a single centre nephrology care team reported that virtual multidisciplinary meetings overcame geographic barriers and infection control restrictions, and offered possibilities for broader inclusivity. However, strategies are needed to overcome technological issues, improve participants' skills to navigate technology, and optimize active participation.

摘要

背景

在新冠疫情期间,面对面的多学科团队会议转变为虚拟平台会议。医疗保健专业人员对虚拟多学科团队会议的体验尚不清楚,而且在疫情后时代虚拟会议是否是可行的长期替代方式也不明确。

目的

探讨管理肾病患者的多学科团队成员对虚拟会议的体验和看法。

设计

进行了半结构化访谈。采用最大差异抽样以确保按性别和专业角色有足够的代表性。所有访谈都进行了录音并逐字转录,然后由两名研究人员独立使用理论领域框架进行分析。如有任何分歧,会请第三位研究人员解决。

参与者

肾病多学科团队会议的成员。

测量

医疗保健专业人员对虚拟多学科团队会议的体验和看法。

结果

在接受访谈的9名参与者中,6名是女性,大多数是护士。大多数参与者年龄在30至40岁之间。在三个主要领域中出现了三个主要主题:对工作人员和患者结果的影响;技术技能有限;以及改进的机会。从四个中间领域中,又捕捉到了另外四个主题:职业责任;对参与度的影响;参与的障碍;以及提供最佳患者护理的愿望。

结论

一个单中心肾病护理团队的医疗保健专业人员报告说,虚拟多学科会议克服了地理障碍和感染控制限制,并提供了更广泛包容性的可能性。然而,需要采取策略来克服技术问题,提高参与者使用技术的技能,并优化积极参与度。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验