• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Multidisciplinary team meetings: are all patients presented and does it impact quality of care and survival - a registry-based study.多学科团队会议:是否所有患者都得到了介绍,以及它是否会影响护理质量和生存率 - 一项基于登记的研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 1;21(1):1032. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07022-x.
2
Multicentre evaluation of multidisciplinary team meeting agreement on diagnosis in diffuse parenchymal lung disease: a case-cohort study.多中心评价弥漫性实质性肺疾病多学科团队会议诊断协议:病例队列研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Jul;4(7):557-565. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30033-9. Epub 2016 May 11.
3
Process quality of decision-making in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings: a structured observational study.多学科癌症团队会议中的决策过程质量:一项结构化观察研究。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Nov 17;17(1):772. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3768-5.
4
Input of Psychosocial Information During Multidisciplinary Team Meetings at Medical Oncology Departments: Protocol for an Observational Study.肿瘤内科多学科团队会议期间社会心理信息的输入:一项观察性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Feb 26;7(2):e64. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9239.
5
Implementation rate and effects of multidisciplinary team meetings on decision making about radiotherapy: an observational study at a single Japanese institution.多学科团队会议在放疗决策中的实施率和效果:日本单一机构的观察性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Apr 27;22(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01849-y.
6
Factors influencing the quality and functioning of oncological multidisciplinary team meetings: results of a systematic review.影响肿瘤多学科团队会议质量和功能的因素:系统评价的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08112-0.
7
Multidisciplinary team meetings in Hematology: a national mixed-methods study.血液学多学科团队会议:一项全国性混合方法研究。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Oct 7;23(1):950. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11431-y.
8
Referral rates to multidisciplinary team meetings: Is there disparity between tumour streams?多学科团队会议的转诊率:不同肿瘤类型之间是否存在差异?
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jun;63(3):378-382. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12851. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
9
Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.丹麦结直肠癌的生存情况
Dan Med J. 2012 Apr;59(4):B4428.
10
How multidisciplinary are multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care? An observational study in oncology departments in Flanders, Belgium.癌症护理中的多学科团队会议有多学科性?比利时弗拉芒地区肿瘤科室的一项观察性研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Feb 21;12:159-167. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S196660. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Health and Health-Related Domains on Professionals' Perceptions of Care Complexity, Their Preferences for Integrated Care Planning and Interprofessional Collaboration.健康及与健康相关领域对专业人员对护理复杂性的认知、其对综合护理规划和跨专业协作的偏好的影响。
Int J Integr Care. 2025 Jul 9;25(3):9. doi: 10.5334/ijic.8997. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
2
Adherence to Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Recommendations and Its Association with Survival: A Retrospective Observational Study of Colorectal Cancer Patients.遵循多学科肿瘤委员会建议及其与生存的关联:一项对结直肠癌患者的回顾性观察研究
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 May 30;56(1):124. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01246-4.
3
Evaluation of the Virtual Multidisciplinary Team Meeting Model for Adult Patients on Haemodialysis: A Qualitative Study.血液透析成年患者虚拟多学科团队会议模式的评估:一项定性研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Apr;31(3):e70071. doi: 10.1111/jep.70071.
4
Professionals' Perceptions of the Colorectal Cancer Pathway: Results of a Co-Constructed Qualitative Study.专业人士对结直肠癌路径的看法:一项共同构建的定性研究结果。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14146. doi: 10.1111/hex.14146.
5
Characteristics and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Patients Cared for by the Multidisciplinary Team in the Reggio Emilia Province, Italy.意大利雷焦艾米利亚省多学科团队护理的结直肠癌患者的特征与结局
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 28;16(13):2390. doi: 10.3390/cancers16132390.
6
A Grounded Theory of Interdisciplinary Communication and Collaboration in the Outpatient Setting of the Hospital for Patients with Multiple Long-Term Conditions.关于医院门诊环境中多慢性病患者跨学科沟通与协作的扎根理论
J Pers Med. 2024 May 16;14(5):533. doi: 10.3390/jpm14050533.
7
Pros and cons of streamlining and use of computerised clinical decision support systems to future-proof oncological multidisciplinary team meetings.简化流程及使用计算机化临床决策支持系统对肿瘤多学科团队会议未来发展的利弊
Front Oncol. 2023 May 18;13:1178165. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1178165. eCollection 2023.
8
Implementation of the measure of case discussion complexity to guide selection of prostate cancer patients for multidisciplinary team meetings.实施病例讨论复杂性度量措施,以指导选择前列腺癌患者参加多学科团队会议。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jul;12(14):15149-15158. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6189. Epub 2023 May 31.
9
Resectability, Resections, Survival Outcomes, and Quality of Life in Older Adult Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (the RAXO-Study).老年转移性结直肠癌患者的可切除性、切除术、生存结果及生活质量(RAXO研究)
J Clin Med. 2023 May 18;12(10):3541. doi: 10.3390/jcm12103541.
10
A Digital Solution for an Advanced Breast Tumor Board: Pilot Application Cocreation and Implementation Study.一种用于高级乳腺癌多学科诊疗团队的数字解决方案:试点应用共创与实施研究
JMIR Cancer. 2023 May 18;9:e39072. doi: 10.2196/39072.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of 105.000 patients with cancer: have they been discussed in oncologic multidisciplinary team meetings? A nationwide population-based study in the Netherlands.分析 105000 例癌症患者:他们是否在肿瘤多学科团队会议中讨论过?荷兰全国范围内基于人群的研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Nov;121:85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.08.007. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
2
Use's assessment of geriatric variables in the older patient with cancer's multidisciplinary team meeting.在癌症老年患者多学科团队会议中使用对老年变量的评估。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2020 Apr;11(3):536-539. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
3
Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): French intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, SFR).转移性结直肠癌(mCRC):法国肿瘤学会临床实践指南,用于诊断、治疗和随访(SNFGE、FFCD、GERCOR、UNICANCER、SFCD、SFED、SFRO、SFR)。
Dig Liver Dis. 2019 Oct;51(10):1357-1363. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.05.035. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
4
How multidisciplinary are multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care? An observational study in oncology departments in Flanders, Belgium.癌症护理中的多学科团队会议有多学科性?比利时弗拉芒地区肿瘤科室的一项观察性研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Feb 21;12:159-167. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S196660. eCollection 2019.
5
Benefits, barriers and opinions on multidisciplinary team meetings: a survey in Swedish cancer care.多学科团队会议的益处、障碍及看法:瑞典癌症护理领域的一项调查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 5;18(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2990-4.
6
Multidisciplinary work in oncology: Population-based analysis for seven invasive tumours.肿瘤学中的多学科工作:七种侵袭性肿瘤的基于人群的分析
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Mar;27(2):e12822. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12822. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
7
No effect of comorbidities on the association between social deprivation and geographical access to the reference care center in the management of colon cancer.社会剥夺与结肠癌参照治疗中心地理可达性之间的关联不受合并症影响。
Dig Liver Dis. 2018 Mar;50(3):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.10.015. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
8
Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.直肠癌:欧洲肿瘤内科学会临床实践指南之诊断、治疗及随访
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv22-iv40. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx224.
9
Global Practice and Efficiency of Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards: Results of an American Society of Clinical Oncology International Survey.多学科肿瘤委员会的全球实践与效率:美国临床肿瘤学会国际调查结果
J Glob Oncol. 2015 Oct 28;1(2):57-64. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2015.000158. eCollection 2015 Dec.
10
Rectal cancer: French Intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO).直肠癌:法国多学科临床实践诊断、治疗及随访指南(法国国立胃肠病学会、法国癌症研究与控制协会、法国消化道肿瘤研究组、法国国家癌症研究院、法国消化外科学会、法国消化内镜学会、法国结直肠癌学会)
Dig Liver Dis. 2017 Apr;49(4):359-367. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.01.152. Epub 2017 Jan 20.

多学科团队会议:是否所有患者都得到了介绍,以及它是否会影响护理质量和生存率 - 一项基于登记的研究。

Multidisciplinary team meetings: are all patients presented and does it impact quality of care and survival - a registry-based study.

机构信息

U1086 "ANTICIPE" INSERM-University of Caen Normandie, U1086 "Anticipe" - Centre François Baclesse, 3, Avenue du Général Harris, 14000, Caen, France.

Digestive Cancer Registry of Calvados, University Hospital of Caen, Avenue de la Côte de Nacre, 14000, Caen, France.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 1;21(1):1032. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07022-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-07022-x
PMID:34592971
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8485542/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) are part of the standard cancer care process in many European countries. In France, they are a mandatory condition in the authorization system for cancer care administration, with the goal to ensure that all new patients diagnosed with cancer are presented in MDTMs.

AIM

Identify the factors associated with non-presentation or unknown presentation in MDTMs, and study the impact of presentation in MDTMs on quality of care and survival in patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

3999 CRC patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2014 in the area covered by the "Calvados Registry of Digestive Tumours" were included. Multivariate multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the factors associated with presentation in MDTMs. Univariate analyses were performed to study the impact of MDTMs on quality of care. Multivariate Cox model and the Log-Rank test were used to assess the impact of MDTMs on survival.

RESULTS

Non-presentation or unknown presentation in MDTMs were associated with higher age at diagnosis, dying within 3 months after diagnosis, unknown metastatic status, non-metastatic cancer and colon cancer. Non-presentation was associated with a diagnosis after 2010. Unknown presentation was associated with a diagnosis before 2007 and a longer travel time to the reference care centres. Presentation in MDTMs was associated with more chemotherapy administration for patients with metastatic cancer and more adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III colon cancer. After excluding poor prognosis patients, lower survival was significantly associated with higher age at diagnosis, unknown metastatic status or metastatic cancer, presence of comorbidities, rectal cancer and non-presentation in MDTMs (HR = 1.5 [1.1-2.0], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly and poor prognosis patients were less presented in MDTMs. Geriatric assessments before presentation in MDTMs were shown to improve care plan establishment. The 100% objective is not coherent if MDTMs are only to discuss diagnosis and curative cares. They could also be a place to discuss therapeutic limitations. MDTMs were associated with better treatment and longer survival. We must ensure that there is no inequity in presentation in MDTMs that could lead to a loss of chance for patients.

摘要

背景

多学科团队会议(MDTMs)是许多欧洲国家癌症治疗标准过程的一部分。在法国,MDTMs 是癌症治疗管理授权系统的强制性条件,目的是确保所有新诊断为癌症的患者都在 MDTMs 中进行讨论。

目的

确定与 MDTMs 中未呈现或未知呈现相关的因素,并研究 MDTMs 中呈现对结直肠癌(CRC)患者治疗质量和生存的影响。

方法

纳入 2005 年至 2014 年间在“卡尔瓦多斯消化肿瘤登记处”覆盖的地区诊断为 3999 例 CRC 患者。使用多变量多项逻辑回归评估与 MDTMs 呈现相关的因素。进行单变量分析以研究 MDTMs 对治疗质量的影响。使用多变量 Cox 模型和 Log-Rank 检验评估 MDTMs 对生存的影响。

结果

MDTMs 中未呈现或未知呈现与诊断时年龄较大、诊断后 3 个月内死亡、未知转移状态、非转移性癌症和结肠癌相关。未呈现与 2010 年后的诊断相关。未知呈现与 2007 年前的诊断和到参考治疗中心的旅行时间较长相关。在 MDTMs 中呈现与转移性癌症患者接受更多化疗以及 III 期结肠癌患者接受更多辅助化疗相关。排除预后不良的患者后,较高的诊断年龄、未知的转移状态或转移性癌症、合并症、直肠癌和 MDTMs 中未呈现与较低的生存显著相关(HR=1.5[1.1-2.0],p<0.001)。

结论

老年和预后不良的患者在 MDTMs 中呈现较少。在 MDTMs 呈现之前进行老年评估可改善治疗计划的制定。如果 MDTMs 仅用于讨论诊断和治疗方法,那么达到 100%的目标是不切实际的。MDTMs 也可以是讨论治疗限制的场所。MDTMs 与更好的治疗和更长的生存相关。我们必须确保 MDTMs 呈现不存在使患者失去机会的不公平现象。