Ehrman Robert R, Malik Adrienne N, Haber Brian D, Glassman Seth R, Bowen Cassidy A, Korzeniewski Steven J, Bauer Samantha J, Sherwin Robert L
Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.
University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Front Disaster Emerg Med. 2024;2. doi: 10.3389/femer.2024.1357806. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
Sepsis remains a common and costly disease. With early recognition and guideline-based treatment, more patients are surviving to hospital discharge. Many survivors experience adverse health events in the months following discharge, while others suffer long-term physical and cognitive decline. Social, biological, and environmental factors affect all aspects of the disease process, from what pathogens one is exposed to, how/if disease develops, what avenues are available for treatment, as well as short- and long-term sequelae of survival. Disparities in sepsis care exist at all stages of a patient's clinical course, but increased survivorship has highlighted the extent to which Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) influence post-discharge adverse events. Despite increased interest in the last decade, a nuanced understanding of causal relationships remains elusive. This is due to several factors: the narrow range of social determinants of health (SDoH) variables typically studied, the inconsistent and non-standardized methods of documenting and reporting SDoH, and the inadequate acknowledgment of how social, environmental, and biological factors interact. Lack of clear understanding of how SDoH influence post- discharge outcomes is an obstacle to development and testing of strategies to mitigate their harms. This paper reviews the literature pertaining to the effects of SDoH on post-discharge outcomes in sepsis, highlights gaps therein, and identifies areas of greatest need for improving the quality and impact of future investigations.
脓毒症仍然是一种常见且代价高昂的疾病。通过早期识别和基于指南的治疗,越来越多的患者存活至出院。许多幸存者在出院后的数月内会经历不良健康事件,而另一些人则会遭受长期的身体和认知衰退。社会、生物和环境因素会影响疾病过程的各个方面,从接触何种病原体、疾病如何发展(或是否会发展)、有哪些治疗途径,到生存的短期和长期后遗症。在患者临床病程的各个阶段都存在脓毒症治疗的差异,但生存率的提高凸显了健康的社会决定因素(SDoH)对出院后不良事件的影响程度。尽管在过去十年中人们对此的兴趣有所增加,但对因果关系的细致理解仍然难以捉摸。这是由几个因素造成的:通常研究的健康社会决定因素(SDoH)变量范围狭窄、记录和报告SDoH的方法不一致且不规范,以及对社会、环境和生物因素如何相互作用的认识不足。缺乏对SDoH如何影响出院后结局的清晰理解,是制定和测试减轻其危害策略的障碍。本文回顾了有关SDoH对脓毒症出院后结局影响的文献,突出其中的差距,并确定未来调查在提高质量和影响力方面最需要改进的领域。