Suppr超能文献

一种新型急诊科脓毒症诊断测试的成本与后果:智能脓毒症指数。

Costs and Consequences of a Novel Emergency Department Sepsis Diagnostic Test: The IntelliSep Index.

作者信息

Hollenbeak Christopher S, Henning Daniel J, Geeting Glenn K, Ledeboer Nathan A, Faruqi Imran A, Pierce Christi G, Thomas Christopher B, O'Neal Hollis R

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Administration, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

Crit Care Explor. 2023 Jul 14;5(7):e0942. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000942. eCollection 2023 Jul.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Sepsis causes 270,000 deaths and costs $38 billion annually in the United States. Most cases of sepsis present in the emergency department (ED), where rapid diagnosis remains challenging. The IntelliSep Index (ISI) is a novel diagnostic test that analyzes characteristics of WBC structure and provides a reliable early signal for sepsis. This study performs a cost-consequence analysis of the ISI relative to procalcitonin for early sepsis diagnosis in the ED.

PERSPECTIVE

U.S. healthcare system.

SETTING

Community hospital ED.

METHODS

A decision tree analysis was performed comparing ISI with procalcitonin. Model parameters included prevalence of sepsis, sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests (both ISI and procalcitonin), costs of hospitalization, and mortality rate stratified by diagnostic test result. Mortality and prevalence of sepsis were estimated from best available literature. Costs were estimated based on an analysis of a large, national discharge dataset, and adjusted to 2018 U.S. dollars. Outcomes included expected costs and survival.

RESULTS

Assuming a confirmed sepsis prevalence of 16.9% (adjudicated to Sepsis-3), the ISI strategy had an expected cost per patient of $3,849 and expected survival rate of 95.08%, whereas the procalcitonin strategy had an expected cost of $4,656 per patient and an expected survival of 94.98%. ISI was both less costly and more effective than procalcitonin, primarily because of fewer false-negative results. These results were robust in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

ISI was both less costly and more effective in preventing mortality than procalcitonin, primarily because of fewer false-negative results. The ISI may provide health systems with a higher-value diagnostic test in ED sepsis evaluation. Additional work is needed to validate these results in clinical practice.

摘要

未标记

脓毒症在美国每年导致27万人死亡,花费380亿美元。大多数脓毒症病例出现在急诊科(ED),在那里快速诊断仍然具有挑战性。智能脓毒症指数(ISI)是一种新型诊断测试,可分析白细胞结构特征并为脓毒症提供可靠的早期信号。本研究对ISI与降钙素原在急诊科早期脓毒症诊断中的应用进行了成本效益分析。

观点

美国医疗保健系统。

背景

社区医院急诊科。

方法

进行决策树分析,比较ISI与降钙素原。模型参数包括脓毒症患病率、诊断测试(ISI和降钙素原)的敏感性和特异性、住院成本以及按诊断测试结果分层的死亡率。脓毒症的死亡率和患病率根据现有最佳文献估计。成本基于对一个大型全国出院数据集的分析进行估计,并调整为2018年美元。结果包括预期成本和生存率。

结果

假设确诊的脓毒症患病率为16.9%(根据脓毒症-3标准判定),ISI策略每位患者的预期成本为3849美元,预期生存率为95.08%,而降钙素原策略每位患者的预期成本为4656美元,预期生存率为94.98%。ISI比降钙素原成本更低且更有效,主要是因为假阴性结果更少。这些结果在敏感性分析中很稳健。

结论

ISI在预防死亡率方面比降钙素原成本更低且更有效,主要是因为假阴性结果更少。ISI可能为医疗系统在急诊科脓毒症评估中提供更高价值的诊断测试。需要进一步开展工作以在临床实践中验证这些结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a09a/10351935/4280edc2102a/cc9-5-e0942-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验