• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Understanding and overcoming barriers to digital health adoption: a patient and public involvement study.理解并克服数字健康应用的障碍:一项患者及公众参与的研究
Transl Behav Med. 2025 Jan 16;15(1). doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaf010.
2
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
3
Understanding and Overcoming Negative Attitudes That Hinder Adoption of Reablement in Dementia Care: An Explorative Qualitative Study.理解并克服阻碍痴呆症护理中采用康复护理的消极态度:一项探索性定性研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jun 12;18:3411-3422. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S522515. eCollection 2025.
4
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
6
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
7
What Matters Most? An Exploration of Quality of Life Through the Everyday Experiences of Autistic Young People and Adults.最重要的是什么?通过自闭症青少年和成年人的日常经历探索生活质量。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):312-323. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0127. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
A Pilot Study of Political Experiences and Barriers to Voting Among Autistic Adults Participating in Online Survey Research in the United States.一项针对参与美国在线调查研究的成年自闭症患者的政治经历和投票障碍的试点研究。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):261-272. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0119. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community-dwelling populations.针对社区居住人群减少有害和危险饮酒行为的个性化数字干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 25;9(9):CD011479. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011479.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital foundations for health equity: Rethinking primary care through the Ayushman Bharat digital mission.健康公平的数字基础:通过阿育吠陀数字使命重新思考初级保健。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Jul;14(7):2605-2607. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1206_25. Epub 2025 Jul 21.
2
Applying the principle of justice in digital health.在数字健康中应用正义原则。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 21;8(1):467. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01877-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Codesigning a Digital Type 2 Diabetes Risk Communication Tool in Singapore: Qualitative Participatory Action Research Approach.在新加坡共同设计数字 2 型糖尿病风险沟通工具:定性参与式行动研究方法。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 5;8:e50456. doi: 10.2196/50456.
2
Understanding inherent influencing factors to digital health adoption in general practices through a mixed-methods analysis.通过混合方法分析了解影响全科医疗中数字健康采用的内在因素。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Feb 27;7(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01049-0.
3
Attrition in Conversational Agent-Delivered Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.会话型人工智能心理健康干预的脱落率:系统综述和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Feb 27;26:e48168. doi: 10.2196/48168.
4
A qualitative study of daily activities that inform a process-based model of well-being among Singaporean adults.一项关于日常活动的定性研究,这些活动为新加坡成年人的幸福感提供了一个基于过程的模型。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Jan 31;8(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00690-3.
5
Computerized cognitive training for memory functions in mild cognitive impairment or dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.针对轻度认知障碍或痴呆患者记忆功能的计算机化认知训练:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Jan 3;7(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00987-5.
6
Does clinical research account for diversity in deploying digital health technologies?临床研究是否考虑到了数字健康技术应用中的多样性?
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Oct 10;6(1):187. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00928-2.
7
Effective Behavior Change Techniques in Digital Health Interventions for the Prevention or Management of Noncommunicable Diseases: An Umbrella Review.数字健康干预措施预防或管理非传染性疾病的有效行为改变技术:伞式综述。
Ann Behav Med. 2023 Sep 13;57(10):817-835. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaad041.
8
A Social-Ecological Approach to Modeling Sense of Virtual Community (SOVC) in Livestreaming Communities.一种用于模拟直播社区中虚拟社区感(SOVC)的社会生态方法。
Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2022 Nov 11;6(CSCW2 Article No 356):1-35. doi: 10.1145/3555081.
9
Continuous usage intention of mobile health services: model construction and validation.移动医疗服务的持续使用意愿:模型构建与验证。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 5;23(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09393-9.
10
Exploring the potential of mobile health interventions to address behavioural risk factors for the prevention of non-communicable diseases in Asian populations: a qualitative study.探索移动健康干预措施在亚洲人群中针对非传染性疾病行为风险因素的预防的潜力:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 24;23(1):753. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15598-8.

理解并克服数字健康应用的障碍:一项患者及公众参与的研究

Understanding and overcoming barriers to digital health adoption: a patient and public involvement study.

作者信息

Mair Jacqueline Louise, Hashim Jumana, Thai Linh, Tai E Shyong, Ryan Jillian C, Kowatsch Tobias, Müller-Riemenschneider Falk, Edney Sarah Martine

机构信息

Future Health Technologies, Singapore-ETH Centre, Campus for Research Excellence And Technological Enterprise (CREATE), 1 Create Way, Singapore, 138602, Singapore.

Behavioural and Implementation Science Interventions, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.

出版信息

Transl Behav Med. 2025 Jan 16;15(1). doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaf010.

DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibaf010
PMID:40167046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11959363/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital health (DH) technologies provide scalable and cost-effective solutions to improve population health but face challenges of uneven adoption and high attrition, particularly among vulnerable and minority groups.

PURPOSE

This study explores factors influencing DH adoption in a multicultural population and identifies strategies to improve equitable access.

METHODS

Using a Patient and Public Involvement approach, lay facilitators engaged adults at public eateries in Singapore to discuss motivations and barriers to DH adoption. A semi-structured guide facilitated discussions, followed by an optional socio-demographic survey. Data were analyzed through inductive thematic analysis and mapped to behavior change theory to identify mechanisms of action (MoA) and behavior change techniques (BCTs) to support adoption.

RESULTS

Facilitators engaged 118 participants between November 2022 and February 2023. Five key themes were identified from the discussions: (a) awareness of DH solutions, (b) weighing benefits against burdens, (c) accessibility, (d) trust in DH developers and technology, and (e) the impact of user experience. These themes were mapped to 13 MoA and 26 BCTs, informing five key strategies to enhance DH adoption: community-based promotion of credible DH solutions and digital literacy training, brief counselling at opportune moments in healthcare settings, variable rewards tied to personal values, policies ensuring accessibility and regulation, and gamified, user-friendly designs emphasizing feedback and behavioral cues.

CONCLUSION

Designing and implementing DH solutions that are accessible, trustworthy, and motivating-integrated within healthcare services and promoted through community efforts-can address barriers to adoption by diverse communities and may help to narrow the digital divide.

摘要

背景

数字健康(DH)技术为改善人群健康提供了可扩展且具成本效益的解决方案,但面临采用不均衡和高流失率的挑战,尤其是在弱势群体和少数族裔群体中。

目的

本研究探讨影响多元文化人群采用数字健康的因素,并确定改善公平获取的策略。

方法

采用患者和公众参与方法,外展促进者在新加坡的公共餐馆与成年人讨论采用数字健康的动机和障碍。一份半结构化指南推动了讨论,随后进行了可选的社会人口学调查。通过归纳主题分析对数据进行分析,并映射到行为改变理论,以确定支持采用的行动机制(MoA)和行为改变技术(BCTs)。

结果

2022年11月至2023年2月期间,促进者与118名参与者进行了交流。从讨论中确定了五个关键主题:(a)对数字健康解决方案的认知,(b)权衡利弊,(c)可及性,(d)对数字健康开发者和技术的信任,以及(e)用户体验的影响。这些主题被映射到13个行动机制和26个行为改变技术,形成了五个增强数字健康采用的关键策略:基于社区推广可靠的数字健康解决方案和数字素养培训,在医疗环境中的适当时机进行简短咨询,与个人价值观挂钩的可变奖励,确保可及性和监管的政策,以及强调反馈和行为提示的游戏化、用户友好设计。

结论

设计和实施易于获取、值得信赖且具有激励性的数字健康解决方案,并将其整合到医疗服务中,通过社区努力进行推广,可以解决不同社区采用数字健康的障碍,并可能有助于缩小数字鸿沟。