Suppr超能文献

“我真的需要所有这些药片吗?”一项定性研究,探讨为接受姑息治疗的患者及其家属减少用药的决策过程。

'Do I actually even need all these tablets?' A qualitative study exploring deprescribing decision-making for people in receipt of palliative care and their family members.

作者信息

Robinson-Barella Anna, Richardson Charlotte Lucy, Bayley Zana, Husband Andy, Bojke Rona, Bojke Andy, Quibell Rachel, Baker Lisa, McDougall Emma, Exley Catherine, Hanratty Barbara, Elverson Joanna, Jansen Jesse, Todd Adam

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Newcastle Patient Safety Research Collaborative PSRC, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2025 May;39(5):543-552. doi: 10.1177/02692163251327900. Epub 2025 Apr 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

For people in receipt of palliative care, where polypharmacy is common and medication burden is high, there remains limited knowledge around the decision-making processes that underpin deprescribing; for example, recent deprescribing studies have focused on wider issues of identifying polypharmacy in palliative care contexts. However, little is known about the specific challenges of, and preferences towards, decision-making to support the deprescribing for people in receipt of palliative care.

AIM

To explore decision-making processes that underpin deprescribing approaches, based on the experiences of people in receipt of palliative care, and their family member(s).

DESIGN

An explorative qualitative study involving in-person semi-structured interviews, analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five semi-structured interviews were conducted with people in receipt of palliative care ( = 25), where 12 of these interviews were undertaken as dyads, with both the patient and a family member together. Interviews were undertaken across a range of settings, spanning: hospice outpatient day units ( = 11), hospice inpatient wards ( = 4), care home ( = 1) and patients' own homes ( = 9), and involved people with diverse diagnoses (including: cancer 52%, heart failure 20%, motor neurone disease 12%, pulmonary fibrosis 4% and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 4%).

RESULTS

Two overarching themes were developed - the first reflected the need to address patient understanding by 'laying the foundations of deprescribing decision-making'. The second theme, 'having a voice in deprescribing decision-making', reflected desires to (pro)-actively involve patients and their family member(s) within these processes.

CONCLUSION

There is a need to take a balanced, person-centred and shared approach to deprescribing decision-making for people receiving palliative care. Co-design strategies offer one approach to further explore this.

摘要

背景

对于接受姑息治疗的患者而言,多重用药现象普遍且用药负担沉重,然而,关于支持减药的决策过程,人们所知有限;例如,近期的减药研究聚焦于在姑息治疗背景下识别多重用药这一更广泛的问题。然而,对于支持接受姑息治疗患者减药决策的具体挑战及偏好,人们却知之甚少。

目的

基于接受姑息治疗患者及其家庭成员的经历,探索支持减药方法的决策过程。

设计

一项探索性定性研究,采用面对面半结构化访谈,并运用反思性主题分析法进行分析。

设置/参与者:对25名接受姑息治疗的患者进行了半结构化访谈(n = 25),其中12次访谈是患者及其家庭成员一起参与的二元访谈。访谈在一系列场所进行,包括:临终关怀门诊日间病房(n = 11)、临终关怀住院病房(n = 4)、养老院(n = 1)和患者家中(n = 9),涉及多种诊断的患者(包括:癌症52%、心力衰竭20%、运动神经元病12%、肺纤维化4%和慢性阻塞性肺疾病4%)。

结果

形成了两个总体主题——第一个主题反映了通过 “奠定减药决策基础” 来解决患者理解问题的必要性。第二个主题 “在减药决策中拥有发言权” 反映了在这些过程中(积极)让患者及其家庭成员参与的愿望。

结论

对于接受姑息治疗的患者,需要采取一种平衡、以患者为中心且共同参与的减药决策方法。协同设计策略提供了进一步探索这一问题的一种方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00d9/12033382/122284e3ba45/10.1177_02692163251327900-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验