Suppr超能文献

神经阻滞治疗难治性创伤后头痛的疗效

Efficacy of Nerve Blocks for Managing Refractory Posttraumatic Headaches.

作者信息

File Christopher, Fang Xiang, Ahmad Rowaid, Harazeen Ahmed, Jung John, Ahmed Fauwad, Ahmad Naveed, Pappolla Sean, Nader Remi, Pappolla Miguel A

机构信息

John Sealy School of Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.

John Sealy School of Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, TX; Department of Neurology, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2025 Mar;28(2):137-145.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nerve blocks (greater occipital, lesser occipital, others) are commonly used, singly or in combination, to treat various forms of refractory headaches, including migraine and cervicogenic headaches. Their efficacy in treating posttraumatic headaches, however, particularly those unresponsive to medications or severely disabling, is not well documented.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the efficacy of nerve blocks in the treatment of posttraumatic headaches.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

A single-specialty outpatient neurology clinic.

METHODS

Patients from January 2022 through July 2023 who fulfilled International Headache Society criteria for posttraumatic headache (i.e., new onset headache developing within the first week following head trauma) were included. A rigorous, comprehensive, and unbiased selection process was followed via Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. Headaches were refractory to various treatments, including analgesic agents or headache prophylactic medications. The treatments the study patients received were a combination of nerve blocks, including greater, lesser, and third occipital nerve blocks, and supraorbital and supratrochlear nerve blocks. We used the percentage of pain improvement in order to assess the response to the blocks: minimal improvement (< 50%), moderate improvement (50-75%), and significant improvement (> 75%) pain relief.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients met the inclusion criteria; 15 were women (44%). The mean (SD) age was 43.11 ± 14 years. Of these 34, 28 stated a significant improvement in headache pain immediately following their injection. Twenty-one patients (75%) rated their response to nerve blocks as a >= 90% improvement in headaches. Six patients reported complete resolution of their headache pain. Expressed as percentage headache pain improvement, average pain improvement was 88%. Six patients reported moderate improvement of their headaches.Thirty-one patients reported an average headache improvement of 73% on Postprocedure Day One. Nineteen of these 31 patients had significant pain improvement from baseline, with 12 of them reaching a >= 90% pain improvement. Eight patients reported moderate improvement, while 4 had minimal headache pain improvement. Twenty-seven patients were available for a 3-month follow-up; they reported an average headache improvement of 73%. Thirteen of these patients reported significant improvement in their headache pain, with 12 of them having a >= 90% improvement in their headaches. Twelve patients reported moderate pain improvement, and 2 had minimal or no pain improvement. Nineteen patients returned for a 6-month follow-up; they reported an average pain improvement of 78%. Twelve patients reported significant pain improvement, with 11 having an improvement of >= 90%. Four patients reported moderate pain improvement, and 3 reported minimal or no pain improvement. Some patients experienced a biphasic response with partial headache recurrence at 3 months, followed by complete headache resolution at 6 months.

LIMITATIONS

Several patients who received multiple nerve blocks were concurrently prescribed prophylactic medications for headache management. Later score improvements cannot be determined to be solely caused by the nerve blocks.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective review offers preliminary but compelling evidence that nerve blocks are a highly effective option for patients with posttraumatic headaches who have not benefited from medication or who suffer from severe, incapacitating symptoms.

摘要

背景

神经阻滞(枕大神经、枕小神经等)通常单独或联合使用,以治疗各种形式的难治性头痛,包括偏头痛和颈源性头痛。然而,其在治疗创伤后头痛,尤其是那些对药物无反应或严重致残的头痛方面的疗效,尚未得到充分记录。

目的

描述神经阻滞在治疗创伤后头痛中的疗效。

研究设计

回顾性病历审查。

研究地点

一家单一专科的门诊神经科诊所。

方法

纳入2022年1月至2023年7月符合国际头痛协会创伤后头痛标准(即头部外伤后第一周内出现的新发头痛)的患者。按照加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)指南,遵循严格、全面且无偏倚的选择过程。头痛对包括镇痛药或头痛预防药物在内的各种治疗均无效。研究患者接受的治疗是神经阻滞的联合应用,包括枕大神经、枕小神经和枕第三神经阻滞,以及眶上神经和滑车上神经阻滞。我们使用疼痛改善百分比来评估对阻滞的反应:最小改善(<50%)、中度改善(50 - 75%)和显著改善(>75%)的疼痛缓解。

结果

34例患者符合纳入标准;15例为女性(44%)。平均(标准差)年龄为43.11±14岁。在这34例患者中,28例表示注射后头痛疼痛有显著改善。21例患者(75%)将他们对神经阻滞的反应评为头痛改善>=90%。6例患者报告头痛疼痛完全缓解。以头痛疼痛改善百分比表示,平均疼痛改善为88%。6例患者报告头痛有中度改善。31例患者在术后第一天报告头痛平均改善73%。这31例患者中有19例自基线起疼痛有显著改善,其中12例达到>=90%的疼痛改善。8例患者报告有中度改善,4例头痛疼痛改善最小。27例患者可进行3个月随访;他们报告头痛平均改善73%。其中13例患者报告头痛疼痛有显著改善,12例头痛改善>=90%。12例患者报告有中度疼痛改善,2例疼痛改善最小或无改善。19例患者返回进行6个月随访;他们报告平均疼痛改善78%。12例患者报告有显著疼痛改善,11例改善>=90%。4例患者报告有中度疼痛改善,3例报告疼痛改善最小或无改善。一些患者出现双相反应,在3个月时头痛部分复发,随后在6个月时头痛完全缓解。

局限性

接受多次神经阻滞的几名患者同时被开了用于头痛管理的预防药物。后期评分的改善不能确定完全是由神经阻滞引起的。

结论

这项回顾性研究提供了初步但令人信服的证据,表明神经阻滞对于那些未从药物治疗中获益或患有严重、致残症状的创伤后头痛患者是一种非常有效的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验