Kisenge Rodrick R, Godfrey Evance, Ideh Readon C, Kamara Julia, Coleman-Nekar Ye-Jeung, Samma Abraham, Manji Hussein K, Sudfeld Christopher R, Westbrook Adrianna, Niescierenko Michelle, Morris Claudia R, Whitney Cynthia G, Breiman Robert F, Duggan Christopher P, Manji Karim P, Rees Chris A
Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2025 Apr 1;112(6):1378-1384. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.24-0648. Print 2025 Jun 4.
Hospital readmissions among neonates are common and may reflect ongoing illness. We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of neonates discharged from two hospitals, one in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and one in Monrovia, Liberia, to develop and internally validate a risk assessment tool to identify neonates at risk for unplanned readmission within 60 days of discharge. One hundred and fifteen candidate variables were collected. The outcome of unplanned readmission was identified through phone calls to caregivers. We constructed a multivariable logistic regression model with best subset selection to identify the optimal combination of variables to identify neonates at risk for readmission. We used bootstrap validation with 500 repetitions to internally validate the tool. Of the 2,344 neonates discharged, 98.5% were enrolled and had 60-day outcomes. Of these, 3.6% were readmitted within 60 days of discharge, with 41.7% of readmissions occurring within 14 days of discharge. The risk assessment tool included eight variables that were predictive of readmissions. Neonates who had documented abnormal posturing during hospital admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 7.29, 95% CI 1.51-35.12), hydrocephalus (aOR 7.52, 95% CI 1.21-46.95), and low birth weight (aOR 3.16, 95% CI 1.69-5.92) had the greatest risk of readmission. The overall discriminatory value of the risk assessment tool was 0.77 (95% CI 0.76-0.79). The risk assessment tool demonstrated excellent calibration for predicting readmissions at low scores. However, this tool requires external validation before it can be used in sub-Saharan Africa to direct resources for follow-up of high-risk neonates.
新生儿再次入院的情况很常见,可能反映出疾病仍在持续。我们对从坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆的一家医院和利比里亚蒙罗维亚的一家医院出院的新生儿进行了一项前瞻性观察队列研究,以开发并在内部验证一种风险评估工具,用于识别出院后60天内有计划外再次入院风险的新生儿。收集了115个候选变量。通过给照顾者打电话来确定计划外再次入院的结果。我们构建了一个采用最佳子集选择的多变量逻辑回归模型,以确定用于识别有再次入院风险新生儿的变量的最佳组合。我们使用500次重复的自助法验证来在内部验证该工具。在2344名出院的新生儿中,98.5%被纳入研究并获得了60天的结果。其中,3.6%在出院后60天内再次入院,41.7%的再次入院发生在出院后14天内。风险评估工具包括八个可预测再次入院的变量。在住院期间有记录的异常姿势(调整后的优势比[aOR]为7.29,95%置信区间为1.51 - 35.12)、脑积水(aOR为7.52,95%置信区间为1.21 - 46.95)和低出生体重(aOR为3.16,95%置信区间为1.69 - 5.92)的新生儿再次入院风险最高。风险评估工具的总体辨别价值为0.77(95%置信区间为0.76 - 0.79)。该风险评估工具在低分预测再次入院方面显示出良好的校准。然而,在撒哈拉以南非洲地区使用该工具指导对高危新生儿进行随访的资源分配之前,需要进行外部验证。