Mori Hideki, Yamasaki Kazumi, Saishoji Yusuke, Torisu Yuichi, Mori Takahiro, Nagai Yuki, Izumi Yasumori
Department of General Internal Medicine, NHO Nagasaki Medical Center, Omura, Nagasaki, Japan
Clinical Research Center, NHO Nagasaki Medical Center, Omura, Nagasaki, Japan.
Emerg Med J. 2025 Jul 22;42(8):519-525. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214210.
Acute appendicitis requires timely diagnosis. The diagnostic efficacy of tongue examination in making this diagnosis has not been established. This study investigates whether the Tongue Coating Index (TCI), a validated measure of tongue coating, can aid in diagnosing acute appendicitis.
We conducted a prospective cohort study (1 September 2018-31 December 2020) at a single Japanese hospital. Adults (≥20 years) with suspected acute appendicitis, presenting to either the emergency department or general outpatient clinic, were enrolled. Tongue images were taken at presentation; two independent examiners-unrelated to clinical care and blinded to patient data-later scored these images using the TCI. A composite reference standard (clinical findings, imaging, histopathology, follow-up) was used to confirm appendicitis. We compared the TCI's diagnostic performance with the Alvarado score and its components using C-index, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity.
Of 145 included patients, 69 (47.6%) were diagnosed with acute appendicitis. The TCI demonstrated comparable discriminative ability (C-index AUC 0.62; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.71) to that of the Alvarado score (0.66; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.75). Of Alvarado score components, migration of pain had an AUC of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.71), anorexia 0.58 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.66) and tenderness in the right lower quadrant 0.55 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.60). At a cut-off of 3, the TCI demonstrated high sensitivity of 96% (95% CI, 88% to 98%) but low specificity of 21% (95% CI, 13% to 32%). Conversely, at a cut-off of 10, the TCI showed increased specificity of 83% (95% CI, 73% to 90%) but reduced sensitivity of 29% (95% CI, 20% to 41%).
The TCI showed comparable diagnostic performance to the Alvarado score and its individual components. TCI may potentially serve as an additional non-invasive indicator for diagnosing or ruling out acute appendicitis. Further research is essential to validate its clinical utility.
急性阑尾炎需要及时诊断。舌诊在该诊断中的诊断效能尚未确立。本研究调查了舌象指数(TCI)这一经过验证的舌苔测量指标是否有助于诊断急性阑尾炎。
我们于2018年9月1日至2020年12月31日在一家日本医院进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。纳入在急诊科或普通门诊就诊的疑似急性阑尾炎的成年人(≥20岁)。就诊时采集舌部图像;两名与临床护理无关且对患者数据不知情的独立检查人员随后使用TCI对这些图像进行评分。采用综合参考标准(临床发现、影像学检查、组织病理学检查、随访)来确诊阑尾炎。我们使用C指数、曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性和特异性,将TCI的诊断性能与阿尔瓦拉多评分及其各组成部分进行比较。
在纳入的145例患者中,69例(47.6%)被诊断为急性阑尾炎。TCI显示出与阿尔瓦拉多评分相当的鉴别能力(C指数AUC为0.62;95%CI,0.53至0.71),阿尔瓦拉多评分为0.66(95%CI,0.57至0.75)。在阿尔瓦拉多评分的各组成部分中,转移性腹痛的AUC为0.63(95%CI,0.55至0.71),厌食为0.58(95%CI,0.50至0.66),右下腹压痛为0.55(95%CI,0.50至0.60)。截断值为3时,TCI显示出96%的高敏感性(95%CI,88%至98%),但特异性低至21%(95%CI,13%至32%)。相反,截断值为10时,TCI的特异性提高至83%(95%CI,73%至90%),但敏感性降至29%(95%CI,20%至41%)。
TCI显示出与阿尔瓦拉多评分及其各组成部分相当的诊断性能。TCI可能潜在地作为诊断或排除急性阑尾炎的一项额外的非侵入性指标。进一步的研究对于验证其临床效用至关重要。