From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging (K.A.E., A.A., C.L., Y.K.L.), Hospital Library and Archives (T.A.W.), Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (S.S.), and Department of Diagnostic Imaging (A.S.D.), The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1X8; and Departments of Family and Community Medicine (R.M.), Pediatrics (S.S.), and Medical Imaging (A.S.D.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Radiology. 2018 Sep;288(3):717-727. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180318. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
Purpose To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios of US, CT, and MRI as second-line imaging modalities after initial US for assessing acute appendicitis in children and adults. Materials and Methods A literature search was conducted in Medline and Embase to identify articles that used surgery or histopathologic examination alone or in combination with clinical follow-up or chart review to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of second-line imaging modalities. The quality of articles was assessed by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 and the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy tools. Results For studies of children, the number of studies and patients were as follows: US, six studies and 548 patients; CT, nine studies and 1498 patients; MRI, five studies and 287 patients. For studies of adults, the number of studies and patients were as follows: US, three studies and 169 patients; CT, 11 studies and 1027 patients; MRI, six studies and 427 patients. Pooled sensitivities and specificities of second-line US for diagnosis of appendicitis in children were 91.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83.8%, 95.5%) and 95.2% (95% CI: 91.8%, 97.3%), respectively; and in adults, the pooled sensitivities and specificities were 83.1% (95% CI: 70.3%, 91.1%) and 90.9% (95% CI: 59.3%, 98.6%), respectively. Regarding second-line CT in children, the pooled sensitivities and specificities were 96.2% (95% CI: 93.2%, 97.8%) and 94.6% (95% CI: 92.8%, 95.9%); and in adults, the pooled sensitivities and specificities were 89.9% (95% CI: 85.4%, 93.2%) and 93.6% (95% CI: 91.2%, 95.3%), respectively. Regarding second-line MRI in children, pooled sensitivities and specificities were 97.4% (95% CI: 85.8%, 100%) and 97.1% (95% CI: 92.1%, 99.0%); and in adults, the pooled sensitivities and specificities were 89.9% (95% CI: 84.8%, 93.5%) and 93.6% (95% CI: 90.9%, 95.5%), respectively. Conclusion Second-line US, CT, and MRI have comparable and high accuracy in helping to diagnose appendicitis in children and adults, including pregnant women. All three modalities may be valid as second-line imaging in a clinical imaging pathway for diagnosis and management of appendicitis.
目的 评估 US、CT 和 MRI 作为儿童和成人急性阑尾炎初始 US 后的二线影像学检查方法的敏感性、特异性和诊断比值比。
材料与方法 在 Medline 和 Embase 中进行文献检索,以确定仅使用手术或组织病理学检查,或结合临床随访或图表审查来评估二线影像学检查方法诊断准确性的文章。使用诊断准确性研究的质量评估-2 和诊断准确性报告标准工具评估文章的质量。
结果 对于儿童研究,研究数量和患者数量如下:US,6 项研究和 548 例患者;CT,9 项研究和 1498 例患者;MRI,5 项研究和 287 例患者。对于成人研究,研究数量和患者数量如下:US,3 项研究和 169 例患者;CT,11 项研究和 1027 例患者;MRI,6 项研究和 427 例患者。汇总儿童二线 US 诊断阑尾炎的敏感性和特异性分别为 91.3%(95%CI:83.8%,95.5%)和 95.2%(95%CI:91.8%,97.3%);成人二线 US 分别为 83.1%(95%CI:70.3%,91.1%)和 90.9%(95%CI:59.3%,98.6%)。关于儿童二线 CT,汇总敏感性和特异性分别为 96.2%(95%CI:93.2%,97.8%)和 94.6%(95%CI:92.8%,95.9%);成人二线 CT 分别为 89.9%(95%CI:85.4%,93.2%)和 93.6%(95%CI:91.2%,95.3%)。关于儿童二线 MRI,汇总敏感性和特异性分别为 97.4%(95%CI:85.8%,100%)和 97.1%(95%CI:92.1%,99.0%);成人二线 MRI 分别为 89.9%(95%CI:84.8%,93.5%)和 93.6%(95%CI:90.9%,95.5%)。
结论 US、CT 和 MRI 作为儿童和成人急性阑尾炎的二线影像学检查方法具有相似的高准确性,包括孕妇。这三种方法都可以作为诊断和管理阑尾炎的临床影像学途径中的二线影像学检查方法。