Zhou Ling, Chen Changwang
Department of Dermatological, The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi, Hubei, China.
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi, Hubei, China.
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2025 Apr 3;27(3):87-94. doi: 10.1080/14764172.2025.2485325. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
The study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of fractional CO laser and 308 nm excimer laser in non-segmental vitiligo.
We carried out a systematic literature search in databases: Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, Wanfang and CNKI. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the combined treatment of fractional CO and 308 nm excimer lasers with other treatments for non-segmental vitiligo were included. The primary outcomes were re-pigmentation rate and side effects.
Twelve RCTs involving a total of 1,064 patients were included. Our results showed significantly higher rates of excellent response (≥75% re-pigmentation) (RR = 1.53, 95%CI: 1.31, 1.78; < .001) and good response (50-75% re-pigmentation) (RR = 1.14, 95%CI: 1.03, 1.26; = .015) in combined treatment group than the control group. A subgroup analysis considering control treatment suggested that, the combination treatment yielded a superior rate of excellent response when compared to either fractional CO laser or 308 nm excimer laser. It also demonstrated a superior rate of good response compared to the fractional CO laser, while showing a comparable effect to 308 nm excimer laser alone. Regarding safety, the adverse event rates were comparable between the two groups (RR = 0.67, 95%CI: 0.43, 1.07; = .093). Meta-regression analysis indicated that none of these potential factors (mean age, gender, disease onset and vitiligo subtype) had any significant effect on excellent response rate. Results of trial sequential analysis (TSA) for excellent response rate suggested that current conclusions regarding combination treatment are adequate, and additional explorations are unlikely to alter the conclusion.
Our results suggested that, the combined treatment of fractional CO and 308 nm excimer lasers seems to be an effective and well-tolerated modality for non-segmental vitiligo. It significantly improves the re-pigmentation rate without posing serious side effects. More high-quality, large-scale RCTs are warranted to further validate these results and explore the long-term efficacy and safety of this treatment approach.
本研究旨在评估剥脱性二氧化碳激光和308nm准分子激光治疗非节段型白癜风的有效性和安全性。
我们在Embase、Web of Science、PubMed、万方和知网等数据库中进行了系统的文献检索。纳入了比较剥脱性二氧化碳激光联合308nm准分子激光与其他治疗方法治疗非节段型白癜风的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局指标为色素再沉着率和副作用。
共纳入12项RCT,涉及1064例患者。我们的结果显示,联合治疗组的优秀反应率(色素再沉着≥75%)(RR = 1.53,95%CI:1.31,1.78;P <.001)和良好反应率(色素再沉着50 - 75%)(RR = 1.14,95%CI:1.03,1.26;P =.015)显著高于对照组。一项考虑对照治疗的亚组分析表明,与单独使用剥脱性二氧化碳激光或308nm准分子激光相比,联合治疗产生了更高的优秀反应率。与剥脱性二氧化碳激光相比,联合治疗也显示出更高的良好反应率,而与单独使用308nm准分子激光的效果相当。关于安全性,两组的不良事件发生率相当(RR = 0.67,95%CI:0.43,1.07;P =.093)。Meta回归分析表明,这些潜在因素(平均年龄、性别、疾病发作和白癜风亚型)均对优秀反应率无显著影响。优秀反应率的序贯试验分析(TSA)结果表明,目前关于联合治疗的结论是充分的,进一步探索不太可能改变结论。
我们的结果表明,剥脱性二氧化碳激光联合308nm准分子激光治疗非节段型白癜风似乎是一种有效且耐受性良好的治疗方式。它能显著提高色素再沉着率,且不会产生严重的副作用。需要更多高质量、大规模的RCT来进一步验证这些结果,并探索这种治疗方法的长期疗效和安全性。