Manna Sumanta, Gayen Sanjib, Varshney Sonal
Specialty of Medical Physics, Kalyan Singh Super Specialty Cancer Institute, C G City, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226002, India.
Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600041, India.
Radiol Phys Technol. 2025 Apr 1. doi: 10.1007/s12194-025-00902-5.
The current standard of modern radiotherapy pre-treatment evaluation of dose distributions measured using gamma pass percentage is the predominant metric for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (PSQA). The aim of the study was to analyze the impact of the different dose levels for three different gamma criteria in various anatomical sites. Retrospectively selected 120 VMAT plans of the brain, head and neck, thorax, and pelvic sites were considered for this study. Quality assurance plans were created and measurements were done using PTW Octavius 4D phantom. Three different gamma criteria were used to evaluate different dose levels' volume gamma passing rates. The maximum gamma passing rate for all dose levels except 100% with a 3%/3 mm criterion was observed for the pelvis site. A significant variation in dose levels was observed with the 3%/2 mm gamma criteria for head and neck sites, particularly above the 85% dose level compared to other anatomical sites. Using 2%/2 mm gamma criteria, there was a rapid fall in the gamma passing rate and all the dose levels showed a significant variation among different sites. This study demonstrated significant variations in gamma passing rates across anatomical sites and dose levels, emphasizing the importance of tailored QA protocols. The findings underscore the need for site-specific action limits and highlight the sensitivity of stricter gamma criteria for detecting errors in complex treatment plans.
现代放射治疗预处理评估中,使用伽马通过率测量剂量分布的当前标准是患者特异性质量保证(PSQA)的主要指标。本研究的目的是分析三种不同伽马标准在不同解剖部位的不同剂量水平的影响。本研究回顾性选择了120例脑、头颈部、胸部和盆腔部位的容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)计划。创建了质量保证计划,并使用PTW Octavius 4D体模进行测量。使用三种不同的伽马标准评估不同剂量水平的体积伽马通过率。除了骨盆部位在3%/3毫米标准下100%剂量水平外,所有剂量水平的最大伽马通过率均被观察到。对于头颈部部位,在3%/2毫米伽马标准下观察到剂量水平有显著变化,特别是与其他解剖部位相比,在85%剂量水平以上。使用2%/2毫米伽马标准时,伽马通过率迅速下降,并且所有剂量水平在不同部位之间均显示出显著变化。本研究证明了伽马通过率在不同解剖部位和剂量水平之间存在显著差异,强调了定制质量保证方案的重要性。研究结果强调了针对特定部位制定行动限值的必要性,并突出了更严格的伽马标准在检测复杂治疗计划中的误差方面的敏感性。