• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

再生混凝土粉末、粘土砖粉末和火山浮石粉末在可持续地质聚合物混凝土中的增值利用。

Valorization of recycled concrete powder, clay brick powder, and volcanic pumice powder in sustainable geopolymer concrete.

作者信息

Tahwia Ahmed M, Abdellatief Mohamed, Salah Aml, Youssf Osama

机构信息

Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.

Department of Civil Engineering, Higher Future Institute of Engineering and Technology in Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 1;15(1):11049. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93598-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-93598-x
PMID:40169758
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11961730/
Abstract

The use of recycled powder as a binder in geopolymer concrete (GPC) represents a promising approach to reducing construction waste and promoting the production of sustainable materials. This study examines the impact of recycled concrete powder (RCP), clay brick powder (CBP), and volcanic pumice powder (VPP) on the mechanical, durability, and thermal properties of GPC with fly ash and slag under water curing. Key mechanical properties, including compressive strength (CS), splitting tensile strength, and flexural strength, were evaluated, while durability was assessed through water absorption, water penetration, and resistance to sulfate and acid attacks. The thermal performance was tested by exposing the samples to elevated temperatures of 200 °C, 400 °C, and 600 °C. Results demonstrated that incorporating 25% RCP enhanced CS by 14.88% at 28 days compared to the control mixture, although higher replacement levels (50% and 75%) led to reduced CS due to increased porosity. Similarly, CBP at 25% substitution resulted in a 21.12% increase in CS, with declines observed at higher replacement levels. Conversely, VPP at 25% substitution decreased CS by 8.68% at 28 days, with further significant reductions at higher levels due to its high porosity. Sulfate resistance testing in a 5% MgSO₄ solution showed minimal mass loss for CBP mixtures (0.3-1.2%) and moderate CS reductions (5.7-29.6%). RCP mixtures exhibited low mass loss (0.3-1.7%) and CS reductions (8.7-15.8%), while VPP mixtures experienced the highest mass losses (1.36-3.4%) and CS reductions (20.5-31.3%). SEM analysis revealed that RCP and CBP mixtures exhibited denser microstructures, which contributed to their enhanced durability and thermal stability. Generally, optimizing the replacement levels of RCP, CBP, and VPP improves the durability, pore structure, and mechanical performance of GPC. Among the materials, CBP demonstrated superior resistance in acidic environments, while RCP excelled in thermal stability, demonstrating their potential for producing sustainable and durable geopolymer concrete.

摘要

在地质聚合物混凝土(GPC)中使用再生粉末作为粘结剂是一种减少建筑垃圾和促进可持续材料生产的有前景的方法。本研究考察了再生混凝土粉末(RCP)、粘土砖粉末(CBP)和火山浮石粉末(VPP)对水养护条件下粉煤灰和矿渣GPC的力学、耐久性和热性能的影响。评估了包括抗压强度(CS)、劈裂抗拉强度和抗弯强度在内的关键力学性能,同时通过吸水率、水渗透性以及抗硫酸盐和酸侵蚀性来评估耐久性。通过将样品暴露于200℃、400℃和600℃的高温下测试热性能。结果表明,与对照混合物相比,掺入25%的RCP在28天时使CS提高了14.88%,尽管更高的替代水平(50%和75%)由于孔隙率增加导致CS降低。同样,25%替代量的CBP使CS增加了21.12%,在更高替代水平下观察到CS下降。相反,25%替代量的VPP在28天时使CS降低了8.68%,由于其高孔隙率,在更高水平下CS进一步显著降低。在5%MgSO₄溶液中的抗硫酸盐测试表明,CBP混合物的质量损失最小(0.3 - 1.2%),CS有适度降低(5.7 - 29.6%)。RCP混合物的质量损失较低(0.3 - 1.7%),CS降低(8.7 - 15.8%),而VPP混合物的质量损失最高(1.36 - 3.4%),CS降低(20.5 - 31.3%)。扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析表明,RCP和CBP混合物表现出更致密的微观结构,这有助于提高它们的耐久性和热稳定性。总体而言,优化RCP、CBP和VPP的替代水平可改善GPC的耐久性、孔隙结构和力学性能。在这些材料中,CBP在酸性环境中表现出优异的抗性,而RCP在热稳定性方面表现出色,证明了它们在生产可持续和耐用地质聚合物混凝土方面的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/90ababa88f17/41598_2025_93598_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/1faacb3ea272/41598_2025_93598_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/7c4523fdca72/41598_2025_93598_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/5eb996e80ad7/41598_2025_93598_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/422e96679f51/41598_2025_93598_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/d5f019832a5b/41598_2025_93598_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/18dd0bf6d74a/41598_2025_93598_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/52650a9c9e7b/41598_2025_93598_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/96a6652323fd/41598_2025_93598_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/93965199ce52/41598_2025_93598_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/b37f78685f63/41598_2025_93598_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/6555fbb65425/41598_2025_93598_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/96ce529c4582/41598_2025_93598_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/1a23e6b0d1e6/41598_2025_93598_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/c4504d4f1d3a/41598_2025_93598_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/5c54c1d9e685/41598_2025_93598_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/3b6f188c3307/41598_2025_93598_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/90ababa88f17/41598_2025_93598_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/1faacb3ea272/41598_2025_93598_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/7c4523fdca72/41598_2025_93598_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/5eb996e80ad7/41598_2025_93598_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/422e96679f51/41598_2025_93598_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/d5f019832a5b/41598_2025_93598_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/18dd0bf6d74a/41598_2025_93598_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/52650a9c9e7b/41598_2025_93598_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/96a6652323fd/41598_2025_93598_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/93965199ce52/41598_2025_93598_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/b37f78685f63/41598_2025_93598_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/6555fbb65425/41598_2025_93598_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/96ce529c4582/41598_2025_93598_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/1a23e6b0d1e6/41598_2025_93598_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/c4504d4f1d3a/41598_2025_93598_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/5c54c1d9e685/41598_2025_93598_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/3b6f188c3307/41598_2025_93598_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe8/11961730/90ababa88f17/41598_2025_93598_Fig17_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Valorization of recycled concrete powder, clay brick powder, and volcanic pumice powder in sustainable geopolymer concrete.再生混凝土粉末、粘土砖粉末和火山浮石粉末在可持续地质聚合物混凝土中的增值利用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 1;15(1):11049. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93598-x.
2
Synergistic effects of basalt fiber and volcanic pumice powder in high-strength geopolymer concrete.
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 27;15(1):14715. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98675-9.
3
Characterization, mechanical strength, rheological properties and life cycle assessment of fully recycled concrete through geopolymer technology.通过地质聚合物技术对全再生混凝土的特性、机械强度、流变性能及生命周期评估
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 19;15(1):9424. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92307-y.
4
Enhancing the properties of geopolymer concrete using nano-silica and microstructure assessment: a sustainable approach.利用纳米二氧化硅增强地质聚合物混凝土性能及微观结构评估:一种可持续方法
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 12;13(1):17302. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44491-y.
5
Experimental Study on the Application of Recycled Concrete Waste Powder in Alkali-Activated Foamed Concrete.再生混凝土废粉在碱激发泡沫混凝土中应用的试验研究
Materials (Basel). 2023 Aug 22;16(17):5728. doi: 10.3390/ma16175728.
6
Systematic multiscale models to predict the compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete at various mixture proportions and curing regimes.系统的多尺度模型预测各种混合比例和养护制度下粉煤灰基地聚物混凝土的抗压强度。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 14;16(6):e0253006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253006. eCollection 2021.
7
Mechanical and durability assessments of steel slag-seashell powder-based geopolymer concrete.钢渣-贝壳粉基地质聚合物混凝土的力学性能与耐久性评估
Heliyon. 2023 Jan 26;9(2):e13188. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13188. eCollection 2023 Feb.
8
Utilization of a PFA-GGBS-Based Precursor in Geopolymer Concrete Production as a Sustainable Substitute for Conventional Concrete.在地质聚合物混凝土生产中使用基于偏高岭土-粒化高炉矿渣的前驱体作为传统混凝土的可持续替代品。
Materials (Basel). 2025 Mar 16;18(6):1309. doi: 10.3390/ma18061309.
9
Sulfate Resistance of Recycled Aggregate Concrete with GGBS and Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer.掺粒化高炉矿渣粉和粉煤灰基地质聚合物的再生骨料混凝土的抗硫酸盐性能
Materials (Basel). 2019 Apr 16;12(8):1247. doi: 10.3390/ma12081247.
10
Strength, durability, and economic analysis of GGBS-based geopolymer concrete with silica fume under harsh conditions.在恶劣条件下基于粒化高炉矿渣粉的硅灰地质聚合物混凝土的强度、耐久性及经济分析
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):31572. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77801-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Hydration, Soundness, and Strength of Low Carbon LC Mortar Using Waste Brick Powder as a Source of Calcined Clay.以废砖粉为煅烧黏土来源的低碳LC砂浆的水化、安定性和强度
Materials (Basel). 2025 Aug 6;18(15):3697. doi: 10.3390/ma18153697.
2
A convolutional neural network-based deep learning approach for predicting surface chloride concentration of concrete in marine tidal zones.一种基于卷积神经网络的深度学习方法,用于预测海洋潮汐区混凝土表面氯化物浓度。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(1):27611. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12035-1.
3
Optimization of concrete with human hair using experimental study and artificial neural network via response surface methodology and ANOVA.
通过响应面法和方差分析,利用实验研究和人工神经网络对含人发混凝土进行优化。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 26;15(1):27215. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12782-1.
4
Influence of Silicate Modulus and Eggshell Powder on the Expansion, Mechanical Properties, and Thermal Conductivity of Lightweight Geopolymer Foam Concrete.硅酸钠模数和蛋壳粉对轻质地质聚合物泡沫混凝土膨胀、力学性能及热导率的影响
Materials (Basel). 2025 May 2;18(9):2088. doi: 10.3390/ma18092088.