• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于无导线起搏器植入术后安全的当日出院策略作为护理标准的专家意见。

Expert opinion on a safe same day discharge strategy as standard of care after leadless pacemaker implantation.

作者信息

Somani Riyaz, Daniels James, Mechulan Alexis, Paul Vincent, Sharman David, Sze Shirley, Prat Xavier Viñolas

机构信息

Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK.

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025 Mar 18;58:101649. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101649. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101649
PMID:40170952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11960643/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Leadless pacemaker (LPs) is a safe and effective alternative to conventional transvenous pacing. There is currently no guidance on which patients could be safely discharged the same day post-procedure.

PURPOSE

To provide guidance to medical teams regarding safe same day discharge (SDD) after LP implantation.

METHODS

An Advisory Board (AB) of 6 expert Micra™ implanters was formed. Interviews were conducted with each member to understand their experience on patient selection, care pathway, complications, and follow-up of Micra™ implanted patients. This information was used to develop a patient pathway for safe SDD after Micra™ implantation. A further survey was conducted to obtain consensus regarding decision points within the pathway.

RESULTS

The SDD after Micra™ Implantation Patient Pathway consists of four phases:Pre-procedure assessment: Social factors are key in deciding suitability of SDD (6/6 AB members agreed, 100%). Patient's comorbidities, frailty status and timing of procedure are also important in decision-making for SDD.Micra™ implant: Ultrasound-guidance reduces vascular access-related complications, increasing the likelihood for SDD (100%).Post-procedure observation: Peri-procedural complications such as pericardial effusion, severe vascular complications, bleeding from access site and device complications would prevent SDD (100%). Patients should complete 6 h of observation prior to discharge (100%).Follow-up: First follow-up should be in-person, 1-4 weeks post-procedure (84 %). Long-term follow-up should be organised as per Micra™ standard of care at each centre (100 %).

CONCLUSIONS

SDD after Micra™ Implantation Patient Pathway was developed via expert consensus. Adoption of the pathway in clinical practice may facilitate safe SDD after Micra™ Implantation.

摘要

引言

无导线起搏器(LPs)是传统经静脉起搏的一种安全有效的替代方案。目前对于哪些患者术后可安全当日出院尚无指导意见。

目的

为医疗团队提供关于无导线起搏器植入术后安全当日出院(SDD)的指导意见。

方法

组建了一个由6位Micra™植入专家组成的咨询委员会(AB)。对每位成员进行访谈,以了解他们在Micra™植入患者的患者选择、护理流程、并发症及随访方面的经验。这些信息被用于制定Micra™植入术后安全当日出院的患者流程。进一步开展调查以就该流程中的决策点达成共识。

结果

Micra™植入术后当日出院患者流程包括四个阶段:术前评估:社会因素是决定当日出院适宜性的关键(6/6,即100%的咨询委员会成员认同)。患者的合并症、虚弱状态及手术时间在当日出院决策中也很重要。Micra™植入:超声引导可减少血管通路相关并发症,增加当日出院的可能性(100%)。术后观察:围手术期并发症,如心包积液、严重血管并发症、穿刺部位出血及器械并发症会妨碍当日出院(100%)。患者出院前应完成6小时的观察(100%)。随访:首次随访应为术后1 - 4周的门诊随访(84%)。各中心应按照Micra™的标准护理安排长期随访(100%)。

结论

Micra™植入术后当日出院患者流程是通过专家共识制定的。在临床实践中采用该流程可能有助于Micra™植入术后的安全当日出院。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdd6/11960643/63047e9ae742/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdd6/11960643/2d46ebda6d42/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdd6/11960643/63047e9ae742/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdd6/11960643/2d46ebda6d42/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdd6/11960643/63047e9ae742/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Expert opinion on a safe same day discharge strategy as standard of care after leadless pacemaker implantation.关于无导线起搏器植入术后安全的当日出院策略作为护理标准的专家意见。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025 Mar 18;58:101649. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101649. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Is day-case surgical procedure safe for MICRA leadless pacemaker implantation?日间手术植入美敦力无导线起搏器是否安全?
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Jan;68(1):117-123. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01907-7. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
3
Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in Hemodialysis Patients: Experience With the Micra Transcatheter Pacemaker.无导线起搏器在血液透析患者中的植入:Micra 经导管起搏器的经验。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Feb;5(2):162-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.12.008. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
4
The Safety and Feasibility of Same-Day Discharge After Implantation of MICRA Transcatheter Leadless Pacemaker System.植入美敦力Micra经导管无导线起搏器系统后当日出院的安全性和可行性
J Atr Fibrillation. 2019 Jun 30;12(1):2153. doi: 10.4022/jafib.2153. eCollection 2019 Jun.
5
Outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantation after cardiac surgery and transcatheter structural valve interventions.心脏手术后及经导管结构性瓣膜介入治疗后无导线起搏器植入的结果。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Nov;34(11):2216-2222. doi: 10.1111/jce.16074. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
6
Development and validation of a risk score for predicting pericardial effusion in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation: experience with the Micra transcatheter pacemaker.开发和验证用于预测无导线起搏器植入患者发生心包积液风险的评分:使用 Micra 经导管起搏器的经验。
Europace. 2022 Jul 21;24(7):1119-1126. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab315.
7
Left femoral venous access for leadless pacemaker implantation: patient characteristics and outcomes.经左侧股静脉入路植入无导线起搏器:患者特征与结局。
Europace. 2021 Sep 8;23(9):1456-1461. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab083.
8
Pediatric Micra leadless pacemaker implantation via internal jugular and femoral veins: experience with 11 patients.经颈内静脉和股静脉植入儿科 Micra 无导线起搏器:11 例患者的经验。
Future Cardiol. 2022 Sep;18(9):679-686. doi: 10.2217/fca-2021-0139. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
9
Morbidity and mortality in patients precluded for transvenous pacemaker implantation: Experience with a leadless pacemaker.经静脉起搏器植入禁忌患者的发病率和死亡率:无导线起搏器的经验。
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Dec;17(12):2056-2063. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.07.035. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
10
Outcomes of Micra Leadless Pacemaker Implants in Centers With and Without Cardiac Surgery.有心脏外科手术和无心脏外科手术的中心进行Micra无导线起搏器植入的结果。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2025 Jul;36(7):1512-1519. doi: 10.1111/jce.16701. Epub 2025 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Is day-case surgical procedure safe for MICRA leadless pacemaker implantation?日间手术植入美敦力无导线起搏器是否安全?
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Jan;68(1):117-123. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01907-7. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
2
Safety of same-day discharge versus overnight stay strategy following cardiac device implantations: a high-volume single-centre experience.心脏器械植入术后当日出院与过夜留观策略的安全性:一项大容量单中心经验。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Mar;66(2):471-481. doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01319-5. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
3
Same-day discharge after implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
心脏植入式电子设备植入后当日出院:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Nov;44(11):1925-1933. doi: 10.1111/pace.14368. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
4
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy.2021年欧洲心脏病学会心脏起搏与心脏再同步治疗指南。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 14;42(35):3427-3520. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364.
5
Updated performance of the Micra transcatheter pacemaker in the real-world setting: A comparison to the investigational study and a transvenous historical control.在真实环境中更新 Micra 经导管起搏器的性能:与研究性研究和经静脉历史对照的比较。
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Dec;15(12):1800-1807. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
6
Complications and Health Care Costs Associated With Transvenous Cardiac Pacemakers in a Nationwide Assessment.全国评估中经静脉心脏起搏器相关并发症和医疗保健费用。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Nov;3(11):1296-1305. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
7
Accelerometer-based atrioventricular synchronous pacing with a ventricular leadless pacemaker: Results from the Micra atrioventricular feasibility studies.基于加速度计的房室同步起搏与无导线心室起搏器:Micra 房室可行性研究结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Sep;15(9):1363-1371. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 11.
8
A Leadless Intracardiac Transcatheter Pacing System.无导线心脏内介入起搏系统。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 11;374(6):533-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511643. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
9
HRS/EHRA Expert Consensus on the Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs): description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations: developed in partnership with the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA); and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the Heart Failure Association of ESC (HFA), and the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA). Endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association (a registered branch of the ESC), the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association.心血管植入式电子设备(CIEDs)监测的HRS/EHRA专家共识:技术、适应症、人员、频率及伦理考量的描述:与心律协会(HRS)和欧洲心律协会(EHRA)合作制定;并与美国心脏病学会(ACC)、美国心脏协会(AHA)、欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)、欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭协会(HFA)及美国心力衰竭学会(HFSA)协作。得到心律协会、欧洲心律协会(ESC注册分支)、美国心脏病学会、美国心脏协会认可。
Europace. 2008 Jun;10(6):707-25. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun122. Epub 2008 May 14.