Azevedo Nathália Helena, Massi Luciana, Lima Guilherme S
Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva, Rua do Matão, 277, Butantã, 05508-090 São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências e Letras, Departamento de Educação, Campus Araraquara, Rodovia Araraquara-Jaú, km 1, Campos Ville, Caixa Postal 174, 14800-901 Araraquara, SP, Brazil.
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2025 Mar 31;97(2):e20240316. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765202520240316. eCollection 2025.
Fact-checking agencies were pivotal in countering misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. We investigated the predominant thematic orientations within Brazilian fact-checking agencies during the pandemic's initial year. Brazil's case is relevant because it has a high traffic of false information and was the second country most affected by the pandemic. From Latam Chequea Coronavirus's database, 838 assertions checked of fact-checking were analysed by automated content analysis, allowing the identification of the thematic incidence through descending hierarchical classification and factorial correspondence analysis. The emerged themes encompassed vaccine, virus origin, social isolation, economic relief, disease mortality, and treatment. Fact-checking agencies assigned varying levels of importance to specific themes, which may reinforce the idea of possible non-neutrality fact-checking journalism. Most categories displayed an irregular publication pattern, indicating they were not part of continuous communicative processes. This research addresses methodological, temporal, and sampling gaps by employing automated analysis, covering the pandemic's initial year, and utilising a substantial dataset from the global South. The study contributes to the ongoing discourse on fact-checking agencies' roles and limitations.
事实核查机构在新冠疫情期间对抗错误信息方面发挥了关键作用。我们调查了疫情第一年巴西事实核查机构的主要主题倾向。巴西的情况具有相关性,因为其虚假信息传播量大,且是受疫情影响第二严重的国家。通过自动内容分析,对来自“拉美核查新冠病毒”数据库的838条事实核查断言进行了分析,通过降序层次分类和因子对应分析确定主题发生率。出现的主题包括疫苗、病毒起源、社会隔离、经济救助、疾病死亡率和治疗。事实核查机构对特定主题赋予了不同程度的重要性,这可能强化了事实核查新闻报道可能不中立的观点。大多数类别呈现出不规则的发布模式,表明它们并非持续传播过程的一部分。本研究通过采用自动分析、涵盖疫情第一年并利用来自全球南方的大量数据集,解决了方法、时间和抽样方面的差距。该研究为正在进行的关于事实核查机构的作用和局限性的讨论做出了贡献。