• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西新冠疫情信息疫情中的事实核查主题趋势:聚焦第一年

Thematic trends in fact-checking in Brazil's COVID-19 infodemic: the first year in focus.

作者信息

Azevedo Nathália Helena, Massi Luciana, Lima Guilherme S

机构信息

Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva, Rua do Matão, 277, Butantã, 05508-090 São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências e Letras, Departamento de Educação, Campus Araraquara, Rodovia Araraquara-Jaú, km 1, Campos Ville, Caixa Postal 174, 14800-901 Araraquara, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

An Acad Bras Cienc. 2025 Mar 31;97(2):e20240316. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765202520240316. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1590/0001-3765202520240316
PMID:40172332
Abstract

Fact-checking agencies were pivotal in countering misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. We investigated the predominant thematic orientations within Brazilian fact-checking agencies during the pandemic's initial year. Brazil's case is relevant because it has a high traffic of false information and was the second country most affected by the pandemic. From Latam Chequea Coronavirus's database, 838 assertions checked of fact-checking were analysed by automated content analysis, allowing the identification of the thematic incidence through descending hierarchical classification and factorial correspondence analysis. The emerged themes encompassed vaccine, virus origin, social isolation, economic relief, disease mortality, and treatment. Fact-checking agencies assigned varying levels of importance to specific themes, which may reinforce the idea of possible non-neutrality fact-checking journalism. Most categories displayed an irregular publication pattern, indicating they were not part of continuous communicative processes. This research addresses methodological, temporal, and sampling gaps by employing automated analysis, covering the pandemic's initial year, and utilising a substantial dataset from the global South. The study contributes to the ongoing discourse on fact-checking agencies' roles and limitations.

摘要

事实核查机构在新冠疫情期间对抗错误信息方面发挥了关键作用。我们调查了疫情第一年巴西事实核查机构的主要主题倾向。巴西的情况具有相关性,因为其虚假信息传播量大,且是受疫情影响第二严重的国家。通过自动内容分析,对来自“拉美核查新冠病毒”数据库的838条事实核查断言进行了分析,通过降序层次分类和因子对应分析确定主题发生率。出现的主题包括疫苗、病毒起源、社会隔离、经济救助、疾病死亡率和治疗。事实核查机构对特定主题赋予了不同程度的重要性,这可能强化了事实核查新闻报道可能不中立的观点。大多数类别呈现出不规则的发布模式,表明它们并非持续传播过程的一部分。本研究通过采用自动分析、涵盖疫情第一年并利用来自全球南方的大量数据集,解决了方法、时间和抽样方面的差距。该研究为正在进行的关于事实核查机构的作用和局限性的讨论做出了贡献。

相似文献

1
Thematic trends in fact-checking in Brazil's COVID-19 infodemic: the first year in focus.巴西新冠疫情信息疫情中的事实核查主题趋势:聚焦第一年
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2025 Mar 31;97(2):e20240316. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765202520240316. eCollection 2025.
2
Misinformation, believability, and vaccine acceptance over 40 countries: Takeaways from the initial phase of the COVID-19 infodemic.40 多个国家的错误信息、可信度与疫苗接种:新冠疫情信息流初始阶段的重要发现。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 9;17(2):e0263381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263381. eCollection 2022.
3
A Stanford Conference on Social Media, Ethics, and COVID-19 Misinformation (INFODEMIC): Qualitative Thematic Analysis.斯坦福社交媒体、伦理与 COVID-19 错误信息会议(INFODEMIC):定性主题分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 15;24(2):e35707. doi: 10.2196/35707.
4
Journalistic Fact-Checking of Information in Pandemic: Stakeholders, Hoaxes, and Strategies to Fight Disinformation during the COVID-19 Crisis in Spain.疫情中的新闻事实核查:西班牙 COVID-19 危机期间的利益相关者、骗局和打击虚假信息的策略。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 29;18(3):1227. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031227.
5
Use of Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Model for COVID-19 Fact-Checking: Development and Usability Study.使用检索增强大语言模型进行COVID-19事实核查:开发与可用性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 30;27:e66098. doi: 10.2196/66098.
6
Infodemic, Misinformation and Disinformation in Pandemics: Scientific Landscape and the Road Ahead for Public Health Informatics Research.大流行中的信息疫情、错误信息和虚假信息:公共卫生信息学研究的科学格局和未来道路。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 27;281:764-768. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210278.
7
COVID-19 Vaccine Fact-Checking Posts on Facebook: Observational Study.**中文译文**: 脸书上的 COVID-19 疫苗事实核查帖子:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 21;24(6):e38423. doi: 10.2196/38423.
8
A quantitative content analysis of topical characteristics of the online COVID-19 infodemic in the United States and Japan.对美国和日本网络 COVID-19 信息疫情主题特征的定量内容分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 9;24(1):2447. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19813-y.
9
Effective Infodemic Management: A Substantive Article of the Pandemic Accord.有效信息疫情管理:大流行协定的实质性条款。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2023 Sep 20;3:e51760. doi: 10.2196/51760.
10
Misinformation on social networks during the novel coronavirus pandemic: a quali-quantitative case study of Brazil.新型冠状病毒大流行期间社交网络上的错误信息:巴西的定性-定量案例研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 23;21(1):1200. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11165-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Burden in Colombia of COVID-19 in Adults and the Associated Clinical Characteristics: A Retrospective Database Analysis.哥伦比亚成年人中新冠病毒病的负担及相关临床特征:一项回顾性数据库分析
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2025 May 22;10(6):146. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed10060146.