Previderè Carlo, Bonin Serena, Cuttaia Calogero, Argentiero Gianmarco, Livieri Tommaso, Cecchetto Giovanni, Oliva Antonio, Fattorini Paolo
Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Section of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
Department of Medical Sciences, University of Trieste, 34149, Trieste, Italy.
Int J Legal Med. 2025 Apr 2. doi: 10.1007/s00414-025-03480-8.
The need for molecular analyses has become increasingly common in the forensic sciences, particularly in forensic pathology, to better shape the causes of death. This approach is called the "molecular autopsy," where conventional medico-legal findings are often enhanced with specific molecular tests to provide reliable clinical and forensic diagnoses. In this context, FFPE (Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded) tissue samples collected during forensic autopsies are the only available specimens in retrospective studies for molecular DNA and/or RNA analyses. It is well known that pre-analytical parameters such as the agonal time, the PMI (Post-Mortem Interval), the fixation procedures, and the FFPE ageing and storage conditions can deeply impact the quality and quantity of the recovered nucleic acids, thus influencing the reliability of the downstream molecular tests. In the present study, we reviewed the recent forensic literature to establish whether these parameters are reported. Our survey showed that up to 34.9% and 40.5% of the 50 selected studies on DNA and RNA, respectively, reported the pre-analytical parameters mentioned above. Many publications did not report the length of agony (if any), which is an important parameter in RNA-based studies and estimations of the PMI; in addition, even relevant information on formalin tissue fixation procedures was often missing, thus impairing any critical evaluation of the PCR-based results. To address these issues, we propose the use of a simple form we set up to be filled out by Forensic Pathologists, where each pre-analytical step concerning the tissue samples collected during autopsy is accurately described and reported. In our opinion, this standardization will help the forensic community compare and evaluate the results of different molecular tests, thus increasing the reliability of the molecular results in forensics.
在法医学中,尤其是法医病理学领域,为了更准确地判定死因,分子分析的需求日益普遍。这种方法被称为“分子尸检”,即通过特定的分子检测来强化传统法医学检查结果,从而提供可靠的临床和法医诊断。在此背景下,法医尸检时采集的福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)组织样本是回顾性分子DNA和/或RNA分析中唯一可用的标本。众所周知,诸如濒死期、死后间隔时间(PMI)、固定程序以及FFPE组织的老化和储存条件等分析前参数会对回收核酸的质量和数量产生深远影响,进而影响下游分子检测的可靠性。在本研究中,我们回顾了近期的法医文献,以确定这些参数是否有报告。我们的调查显示,在50项选定的关于DNA和RNA的研究中,分别有高达34.9%和40.5%的研究报告了上述分析前参数。许多出版物未报告濒死期时长(如有),而这在基于RNA的研究和PMI估算中是一个重要参数;此外,甚至关于福尔马林组织固定程序的相关信息也常常缺失,从而影响了对基于PCR结果的任何批判性评估。为解决这些问题,我们建议使用我们设计的一种简单表格,由法医病理学家填写,其中准确描述和报告了与尸检时采集的组织样本相关的每个分析前步骤。我们认为,这种标准化将有助于法医界比较和评估不同分子检测的结果,从而提高法医学中分子结果的可靠性。