Novotny Jessie Lanterman, Hung Keng-Lou James, Lybbert Andrew H, Kaplan Ian, Goodell Karen
Department of Biology, Hiram College, Hiram, Ohio, United States of America.
Oklahoma Biological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 2;20(4):e0311634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311634. eCollection 2025.
To minimize the risk to bees and other beneficial insects, plant protection chemicals are typically applied to pollinator-dependent crop plants when flowers are absent or unopened. However, this approach does not entirely remove the risk of pollinator exposure. Much research has focused on negative effects of systemic insecticides (e.g., seed treatments) on pollinators, but less is known about the level of hazard posed by translocation of non-systemic foliar-applied pesticides to pollen and nectar that bees consume. In this study we assess the frequency and persistence of six foliar-applied pesticides in pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) tissues and in their bee visitors. We analyzed residues of three insecticides (carbaryl, lambda-cyhalothrin, permethrin) and three fungicides (chlorothalonil, quinoxyfen, triflumizole) in pumpkin leaves, pollen, and nectar collected from five farms in the north-central USA, one day before a spray event, and one, three, and seven days after. Bees foraging on pumpkin flowers were collected one day before and one day after spray and screened for the same pesticides. Overall, insecticides were present in 56% of leaf samples. Compared to leaves, fewer pollen (insecticide detected in 16%, fungicide in 16%) and nectar samples (14%, 0%) contained pesticides. We detected one insecticide (carbaryl) in two out of 69 samples of foraging bees, and only in male squash bees (not in bumble or honey bees), which have life history traits that bring them into prolonged close contact with the sprayed crop plants. The persistence of some agrochemicals in leaves, pollen, and nectar up to a week following application merits consideration when managing pollinator-dependent crops. Even pesticides that are traditionally considered contact-based and applied when flowers are unopened can reach pollen and nectar and produce measurable risk to bees.
为了将对蜜蜂和其他有益昆虫的风险降至最低,通常在花朵尚未出现或未开放时,对依赖传粉者的农作物施用植物保护化学品。然而,这种方法并不能完全消除传粉者接触化学品的风险。许多研究集中在系统性杀虫剂(如种子处理剂)对传粉者的负面影响上,但对于非系统性叶面施用农药向蜜蜂所食用的花粉和花蜜中的转移所造成的危害程度,人们了解较少。在本研究中,我们评估了六种叶面施用农药在南瓜(西葫芦)组织及其访花蜜蜂体内的残留频率和持久性。我们分析了从美国中北部五个农场采集的南瓜叶、花粉和花蜜中三种杀虫剂(西维因、高效氯氟氰菊酯、氯菊酯)和三种杀菌剂(百菌清、喹氧灵、氟菌唑)的残留量,分别在喷雾事件前一天以及喷雾后一天、三天和七天进行采样。在喷雾前一天和喷雾后一天采集在南瓜花上觅食的蜜蜂,并检测相同的农药。总体而言,56%的叶片样本中含有杀虫剂。与叶片相比,含有农药的花粉样本(16%检测到杀虫剂,16%检测到杀菌剂)和花蜜样本(14%、0%)较少。在69个觅食蜜蜂样本中,我们在两个样本中检测到一种杀虫剂(西维因),且仅在雄花南瓜蜂中检测到(在熊蜂或蜜蜂中未检测到),雄花南瓜蜂的生活史特征使其与喷施农药的作物长期密切接触。在管理依赖传粉者的作物时,应考虑某些农用化学品在施用后长达一周的时间内仍会残留在叶片、花粉和花蜜中。即使是传统上被认为是触杀型且在花朵未开放时施用的农药,也会进入花粉和花蜜中,并对蜜蜂产生可测量的风险。