Chen Jiaqiang, Zhang Luxin, Dai Zhihong, Chang Cheng, Tong Heyao, Cui Hepeng, Song Zhuwei, Fan Bo, Liu Zhiyu, Wang Liang
Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No.467, Zhongshan Road, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China.
Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Urological Digital Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, Dalian, 116011, Liaoning, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 2;15(1):11221. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96261-7.
Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the gold standard therapy for patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). In this study, we compared the effect of two surgical techniques, single-position complete retroperitoneoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (SCRNU) and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with open bladder cuff excision (LNOBE), on perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes in UTUC patients. We retrospectively collected information on baseline characteristics, clinicopathological characteristics, surgical approaches, perioperative data, and survival outcomes from 174 patients who underwent RNU for UTUC between January 2018 and June 2023 in our center. The data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test, Fisher's exact test, Chi-square test. Linear regressions were applied to explore the effect of surgery approach on the continuous outcomes. Log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted to describe the survival outcome. Univariate and Multivariate Cox regressions were conducted to explore the independent prognostic factors. To address potential selection bias, we also employed an Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) strategy. Patients who underwent SCRNU had shorter operative times (p < 0.001), reduced estimated blood loss (p < 0.001), less drainage on the first postoperative day (p = 0.009), shorter hospital stays (p = 0.001), and better intravesical recurrence-free survival than those who underwent LNOBE (IVRFS, HR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.07-0.44, p = 0.007). Moreover, SCRNU was confirmed to be a protective factor for IVRFS after IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis was performed (HR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.04-0.77, p = 0.021). SCRNU not only avoids intraoperative repositioning but also improves perioperative outcomes, including the reduction of operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay, and is associated with better IVRFS.
根治性肾输尿管切除术(RNU)是上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)患者的金标准治疗方法。在本研究中,我们比较了两种手术技术,即单体位完全后腹腔镜根治性肾输尿管切除术(SCRNU)和腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术联合开放膀胱袖口切除术(LNOBE),对UTUC患者围手术期和长期肿瘤学结局的影响。我们回顾性收集了2018年1月至2023年6月期间在我们中心因UTUC接受RNU治疗的174例患者的基线特征、临床病理特征、手术方式、围手术期数据和生存结局信息。数据采用Mann-Whitney检验、Fisher精确检验、卡方检验进行分析。应用线性回归探讨手术方式对连续结局的影响。绘制Log-rank检验和Kaplan-Meier生存曲线以描述生存结局。进行单因素和多因素Cox回归以探讨独立预后因素。为解决潜在的选择偏倚,我们还采用了逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)策略。与接受LNOBE的患者相比,接受SCRNU的患者手术时间更短(p < 0.001),估计失血量减少(p < 0.001),术后第一天引流量更少(p = 0.009),住院时间更短(p = 0.001),膀胱内无复发生存期更好(IVRFS,HR:0.17,95%CI:0.07 - 0.44,p = 0.007)。此外,在进行IPTW调整的Cox回归分析后,SCRNU被确认为IVRFS的保护因素(HR:0.17,95%CI:0.04 - 0.77,p = 0.021)。SCRNU不仅避免了术中重新定位,还改善了围手术期结局,包括缩短手术时间、减少失血量和缩短住院时间,并且与更好的IVRFS相关。